Should AI-enabled medical devices be explainable?

IF 1.6 Q1 LAW
Rita Matulionyte, Paul Nolan, Farah Magrabi, Amin Beheshti
{"title":"Should AI-enabled medical devices be explainable?","authors":"Rita Matulionyte, Paul Nolan, Farah Magrabi, Amin Beheshti","doi":"10.1093/ijlit/eaac015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its exponential growth, artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare faces various challenges. One of them is a lack of explainability of AI medical devices, which arguably leads to insufficient trust in AI technologies, quality, and accountability and liability issues. The aim of this paper is to examine whether, why and to what extent AI explainability should be demanded with relation to AI-enabled medical devices and their outputs. Relying on a critical analysis of interdisciplinary literature on this topic and an empirical study, we conclude that the role of AI explainability in the medical AI context is a limited one. If narrowly defined, AI explainability principle is capable of addressing only a limited range of challenges associated with AI and is likely to reach fewer goals than sometimes expected. The study shows that, instead of technical explainability of medical AI devices, most stakeholders need more transparency around its development and quality assurance process.","PeriodicalId":44278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Information Technology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its exponential growth, artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare faces various challenges. One of them is a lack of explainability of AI medical devices, which arguably leads to insufficient trust in AI technologies, quality, and accountability and liability issues. The aim of this paper is to examine whether, why and to what extent AI explainability should be demanded with relation to AI-enabled medical devices and their outputs. Relying on a critical analysis of interdisciplinary literature on this topic and an empirical study, we conclude that the role of AI explainability in the medical AI context is a limited one. If narrowly defined, AI explainability principle is capable of addressing only a limited range of challenges associated with AI and is likely to reach fewer goals than sometimes expected. The study shows that, instead of technical explainability of medical AI devices, most stakeholders need more transparency around its development and quality assurance process.
人工智能医疗设备是否可以解释?
尽管人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域呈指数级增长,但仍面临各种挑战。其中之一是人工智能医疗设备缺乏可解释性,这可能导致对人工智能技术、质量以及问责制和责任问题的信任不足。本文的目的是研究是否、为什么以及在多大程度上应该要求与人工智能支持的医疗设备及其输出相关的人工智能可解释性。根据对该主题的跨学科文献的批判性分析和实证研究,我们得出结论,人工智能在医疗人工智能背景下的可解释性作用是有限的。如果狭义地定义,人工智能可解释性原则只能解决与人工智能相关的有限范围的挑战,并且可能达到比有时预期的更少的目标。该研究表明,大多数利益相关者需要的不是医疗人工智能设备的技术可解释性,而是其开发和质量保证过程的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Information Technology provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of Information Technology, Communications and Cyberspace law as well as the issues arising from applying Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) to legal practice. International in scope, this journal has become essential for legal and computing professionals and legal scholars of the law related to IT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信