{"title":"Differentiation of hemp from marijuana using a qualitative decision-point assay","authors":"Ya-Chih Cheng, Sarah Kerrigan","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Marijuana and hemp are different cultivars of the species, <em>Cannabis sativa</em>. Trichomes within these genetically distinct forms result in different chemical constituents within the plant matrix. While drug-type cannabis yields higher total Δ9-THC concentrations, industrial or consumer-based hemp products are typically rich in cannabidiol or CBD-rich. Regulatory changes following the passage of agricultural legislation in the United States defines hemp as <em>C. sativa</em> containing no more than 0.3 % Δ9-THC on a dry weight basis. This threshold, which effectively differentiates legal hemp from illegal marijuana, presents a challenge to operational forensic laboratories. In this report we describe a decision-point assay to differentiate hemp from marijuana using a 1 % threshold. Methanolic extracts of <em>C. sativa</em> were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) using a deuterated analog (Δ9-THC-D3). Synchronous selected ion monitoring (SIM) and full scan acquisition was used for targeted analysis of Δ9-THC at the decision-point. Assay performance was evaluated in terms of limit of detection, linearity, carryover, selectivity, precision, accuracy and extract stability. Two analytical approaches are presented. Extraction efficiencies of Δ9-THC from plant matrix were 80–92 %, and decarboxylation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) was 67 %. Interferences arising from the cyclization of CBD to produce Δ9-THC in the GC inlet were addressed using concentrations in excess of those typically encountered in plant samples. Accuracy was established across the specified range of the assay using known reference materials containing 0.12 to 10.1 % Δ9-THC. No false positive or negative results were identified (n = 140) using both analytical approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000772/pdfft?md5=b6eac24f63188fe8d2afa17e1b8bb2f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2468170923000772-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Marijuana and hemp are different cultivars of the species, Cannabis sativa. Trichomes within these genetically distinct forms result in different chemical constituents within the plant matrix. While drug-type cannabis yields higher total Δ9-THC concentrations, industrial or consumer-based hemp products are typically rich in cannabidiol or CBD-rich. Regulatory changes following the passage of agricultural legislation in the United States defines hemp as C. sativa containing no more than 0.3 % Δ9-THC on a dry weight basis. This threshold, which effectively differentiates legal hemp from illegal marijuana, presents a challenge to operational forensic laboratories. In this report we describe a decision-point assay to differentiate hemp from marijuana using a 1 % threshold. Methanolic extracts of C. sativa were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) using a deuterated analog (Δ9-THC-D3). Synchronous selected ion monitoring (SIM) and full scan acquisition was used for targeted analysis of Δ9-THC at the decision-point. Assay performance was evaluated in terms of limit of detection, linearity, carryover, selectivity, precision, accuracy and extract stability. Two analytical approaches are presented. Extraction efficiencies of Δ9-THC from plant matrix were 80–92 %, and decarboxylation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) was 67 %. Interferences arising from the cyclization of CBD to produce Δ9-THC in the GC inlet were addressed using concentrations in excess of those typically encountered in plant samples. Accuracy was established across the specified range of the assay using known reference materials containing 0.12 to 10.1 % Δ9-THC. No false positive or negative results were identified (n = 140) using both analytical approaches.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.