{"title":"Did Fully Fledged humanitas Exist before the Ciceronian Age?","authors":"Simon Mollea","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the relationship between the noun <jats:italic>humanitas</jats:italic> and the adjective <jats:italic>humanus</jats:italic>. In particular, it argues that literary evidence suggests that the comparative and the superlative of <jats:italic>humanus</jats:italic> are far more suitable than its positive grade to render the Greek ideas of <jats:styled-content xml:lang=\"el-Grek\">παιδεία</jats:styled-content> and/or <jats:styled-content xml:lang=\"el-Grek\">φιλανθρωπία</jats:styled-content> which are usually subsumed in the word <jats:italic>humanitas</jats:italic>. One of the main consequences of this is therefore that it might be hazardous to speak about the <jats:italic>humanitas</jats:italic> of authors who wrote before the comparative and the superlative of <jats:italic>humanus</jats:italic>, if not the word <jats:italic>humanitas</jats:italic> itself, were first attested. Crucial to this discussion are passages by Aulus Gellius, Terence, Cicero, Valerius Maximus and Ammianus, as well as some occurrences of the expressions <jats:italic>studia humanitatis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>studia humaniora</jats:italic> we find in some Renaissance Humanists.","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between the noun humanitas and the adjective humanus. In particular, it argues that literary evidence suggests that the comparative and the superlative of humanus are far more suitable than its positive grade to render the Greek ideas of παιδεία and/or φιλανθρωπία which are usually subsumed in the word humanitas. One of the main consequences of this is therefore that it might be hazardous to speak about the humanitas of authors who wrote before the comparative and the superlative of humanus, if not the word humanitas itself, were first attested. Crucial to this discussion are passages by Aulus Gellius, Terence, Cicero, Valerius Maximus and Ammianus, as well as some occurrences of the expressions studia humanitatis and studia humaniora we find in some Renaissance Humanists.
期刊介绍:
Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.