Who Is Employed? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa on Redefining Employment

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Isis Gaddis, Gbemisola Oseni, Amparo Palacios-Lopez, Janneke Pieters
{"title":"Who Is Employed? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa on Redefining Employment","authors":"Isis Gaddis, Gbemisola Oseni, Amparo Palacios-Lopez, Janneke Pieters","doi":"10.1093/jae/ejac021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (in 2013) redefined thelabour statistics standards, and most National Statistical Offices are currently transitioning to the revised standards. A major change, of which few academics seem to be aware, is that the concept of employment has been narrowed to work for pay or profit. By the revised standards, farming, which is mainly intended for own use, is no longer considered employment, and such a farmer is no longer considered to be employed or in the labour force. Instead, their work is captured under a new indicator of own-use production work. This paper analyses the implications of the revised standards on measures of employment in Sub-Saharan Africa drawing on specialised agricultural surveys from Ghana and Malawi and nationally representative multi-topic household surveys from two early adapters, Malawi and Nigeria. In some contexts, 70% to 80% of farmers produce for family consumption and are therefore, based on this activity, not considered employed by the revised standards; however, there is wide geographic variation. Moreover, farmers are more likely to produce for sale at the end of the growing season of the main local crop than earlier in the season. Men are more likely than women to produce for sale. Official labour statistics, based on the revised standards, show significantly lower employment-to-population ratios in rural Africa and give the impression of rural populations much less reliant on agriculture and much further along in the process of structural change than what was indicated by the previous standards.","PeriodicalId":51524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Economies","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejac021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (in 2013) redefined thelabour statistics standards, and most National Statistical Offices are currently transitioning to the revised standards. A major change, of which few academics seem to be aware, is that the concept of employment has been narrowed to work for pay or profit. By the revised standards, farming, which is mainly intended for own use, is no longer considered employment, and such a farmer is no longer considered to be employed or in the labour force. Instead, their work is captured under a new indicator of own-use production work. This paper analyses the implications of the revised standards on measures of employment in Sub-Saharan Africa drawing on specialised agricultural surveys from Ghana and Malawi and nationally representative multi-topic household surveys from two early adapters, Malawi and Nigeria. In some contexts, 70% to 80% of farmers produce for family consumption and are therefore, based on this activity, not considered employed by the revised standards; however, there is wide geographic variation. Moreover, farmers are more likely to produce for sale at the end of the growing season of the main local crop than earlier in the season. Men are more likely than women to produce for sale. Official labour statistics, based on the revised standards, show significantly lower employment-to-population ratios in rural Africa and give the impression of rural populations much less reliant on agriculture and much further along in the process of structural change than what was indicated by the previous standards.
谁受雇?来自撒哈拉以南非洲关于重新定义就业的证据
第19届国际劳工统计学家会议(2013年)重新定义了劳工统计标准,大多数国家统计局目前正在向修订后的标准过渡。一个主要的变化是,就业的概念已经被缩小到为报酬或利润而工作,但似乎很少有学者意识到这一点。根据修订后的标准,主要供自己使用的农业不再被视为就业,这样的农民也不再被视为就业或劳动力。相反,他们的工作被记录在自用生产工作的新指标下。本文利用加纳和马拉维的专门农业调查以及马拉维和尼日利亚两个早期适应者的全国代表性多主题家庭调查,分析了修订后的标准对撒哈拉以南非洲就业措施的影响。在某些情况下,70%至80%的农民生产供家庭消费,因此,根据这种活动,不被视为经修订的标准所雇用;然而,地域差异很大。此外,农民更有可能在当地主要作物生长季节结束时生产供销售,而不是在该季节早些时候生产。男性比女性更有可能为销售而生产。根据订正标准编制的官方劳工统计数字显示,非洲农村的就业与人口之比明显较低,给人的印象是农村人口对农业的依赖比以前的标准所显示的要少得多,结构变化的进程也比以前的标准所显示的要快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Economies is a vehicle to carry rigorous economic analysis, focused entirely on Africa, for Africans and anyone interested in the continent - be they consultants, policymakers, academics, traders, financiers, development agents or aid workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信