Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley (review)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS
Prudence Jones
{"title":"Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley (review)","authors":"Prudence Jones","doi":"10.1353/clw.2023.a912765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III</em> by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Prudence Jones </li> </ul> Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley. <em>Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III</em>. London and New York: Routledge, 2023. Pp. xiii, 275. $170.00. ISBN 978-1-1386-3509-8. <p>Despite the large number of books on Cleopatra VII, other Ptolemies have received relatively little attention from biographers. The tide may be turning, however, as Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley add their study of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III to a growing corpus on earlier Ptolemies that includes works on Ptolemy I by Worthington, Berenice II by Clayman, and Arsinoë II by Carney.<sup>1</sup> As such, it is a welcome addition to scholarship on the Hellenistic world. The book tells the fascinating story of two women, who were born into extraordinary circumstances but also were architects of their own success in a way that will interest scholars and lay readers alike.</p> <p>While much of <em>Sister-Queens</em> presents a detailed account of the two Cleopatras' lives, Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley go beyond biography to consider broader aspects of queenship and to reframe the final century of Ptolemaic rule as the High Hellenistic Period. The authors argue that the High Hellenistic Period is deserving of rehabilitation just as Hellenistic art has come to be seen as more than \"Baroque.\"</p> <p>As the authors point out in their \"Introduction,\" these two Cleopatras themselves require some image rehabilitation. Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century accounts emphasize their cruelty to the point of casting them as psychopaths. Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley argue, however, that the women wielded dynastic power strategically and within the norms of the High Hellenistic Period, which they describe as \"a curious mix of tradition, innovation, and improvisation.\" (22).</p> <p>After an initial chapter (\"The Importance of Being Ptolemaic: Royal Women in Context\") that provides background on the public and private lives of women in Hellenistic dynasties and on the essential qualities of the Ptolemaic dynasty, the authors devote two chapters (\"Princesses to Queens\" and \"Mothers, Wives, Queens\") to the years 163–101 <small>bc</small>, which span the lives of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III. In doing so, they also detail key periods of Cleopatra II's life.</p> <p>The fourth chapter, \"Queenship in Name; Queenship through Image; Queenship in Practice,\" departs from narrative biography to consider Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III as part of the administrative system that was Hellenistic monarchy. The authors aim to answer the questions \"What was the public image of these royal women? … and what can be said of the role of the queen in shaping <strong>[End Page 109]</strong> how she was identified and depicted?\" (179–80). An analysis of the Cleopatras' royal titles structures the answer to the first question: these queens benefited from an already-institutionalized system of female power. To answer the second question, the authors reflect upon the queens' biographies to \"identify consistent agendas\" that indicate their involvement and agency in administering their empires (198). For Cleopatra Thea, the authors identify diplomacy as her key strategy for maintaining stability in Syria. In Egypt, Cleopatra III focused on the economy and used Egypt's increasing wealth to fund exploration and ambitious building projects like the Dendera temple.</p> <p>Chapter five, \"Fast-Forward: The <em>Pentekontaetia</em>,\" assesses the importance of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III through their influence on subsequent generations of Seleucids and Ptolemies during the 50 years following Cleopatra III's death. There, the authors argue that Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III are under-appreciated as role models for Cleopatra VII.</p> <p>A brief epilogue explores the relationship between Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III to argue that Hellenistic monarchy represented less the singular rule of one individual and more the dominance of an <em>oikos</em>, or household. In this sense, the two Cleopatras are inextricably linked in a larger dynastic system.</p> <p>In this excellent volume, Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley present a meticulously researched and highly readable treatment of two Cleopatras and the historical period in which they flourished. More than a biography, <em>Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period</em> brings welcome attention to the Greek-speaking world of the second century <small>bc</small>. With the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46369,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL WORLD","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL WORLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2023.a912765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley
  • Prudence Jones
Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones and Alex McAuley. Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period: Kleopatra Thea and Kleopatra III. London and New York: Routledge, 2023. Pp. xiii, 275. $170.00. ISBN 978-1-1386-3509-8.

Despite the large number of books on Cleopatra VII, other Ptolemies have received relatively little attention from biographers. The tide may be turning, however, as Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley add their study of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III to a growing corpus on earlier Ptolemies that includes works on Ptolemy I by Worthington, Berenice II by Clayman, and Arsinoë II by Carney.1 As such, it is a welcome addition to scholarship on the Hellenistic world. The book tells the fascinating story of two women, who were born into extraordinary circumstances but also were architects of their own success in a way that will interest scholars and lay readers alike.

While much of Sister-Queens presents a detailed account of the two Cleopatras' lives, Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley go beyond biography to consider broader aspects of queenship and to reframe the final century of Ptolemaic rule as the High Hellenistic Period. The authors argue that the High Hellenistic Period is deserving of rehabilitation just as Hellenistic art has come to be seen as more than "Baroque."

As the authors point out in their "Introduction," these two Cleopatras themselves require some image rehabilitation. Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century accounts emphasize their cruelty to the point of casting them as psychopaths. Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley argue, however, that the women wielded dynastic power strategically and within the norms of the High Hellenistic Period, which they describe as "a curious mix of tradition, innovation, and improvisation." (22).

After an initial chapter ("The Importance of Being Ptolemaic: Royal Women in Context") that provides background on the public and private lives of women in Hellenistic dynasties and on the essential qualities of the Ptolemaic dynasty, the authors devote two chapters ("Princesses to Queens" and "Mothers, Wives, Queens") to the years 163–101 bc, which span the lives of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III. In doing so, they also detail key periods of Cleopatra II's life.

The fourth chapter, "Queenship in Name; Queenship through Image; Queenship in Practice," departs from narrative biography to consider Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III as part of the administrative system that was Hellenistic monarchy. The authors aim to answer the questions "What was the public image of these royal women? … and what can be said of the role of the queen in shaping [End Page 109] how she was identified and depicted?" (179–80). An analysis of the Cleopatras' royal titles structures the answer to the first question: these queens benefited from an already-institutionalized system of female power. To answer the second question, the authors reflect upon the queens' biographies to "identify consistent agendas" that indicate their involvement and agency in administering their empires (198). For Cleopatra Thea, the authors identify diplomacy as her key strategy for maintaining stability in Syria. In Egypt, Cleopatra III focused on the economy and used Egypt's increasing wealth to fund exploration and ambitious building projects like the Dendera temple.

Chapter five, "Fast-Forward: The Pentekontaetia," assesses the importance of Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III through their influence on subsequent generations of Seleucids and Ptolemies during the 50 years following Cleopatra III's death. There, the authors argue that Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III are under-appreciated as role models for Cleopatra VII.

A brief epilogue explores the relationship between Cleopatra Thea and Cleopatra III to argue that Hellenistic monarchy represented less the singular rule of one individual and more the dominance of an oikos, or household. In this sense, the two Cleopatras are inextricably linked in a larger dynastic system.

In this excellent volume, Llewellyn-Jones and McAuley present a meticulously researched and highly readable treatment of two Cleopatras and the historical period in which they flourished. More than a biography, Sister-Queens in the High Hellenistic Period brings welcome attention to the Greek-speaking world of the second century bc. With the...

希腊化鼎盛时期的姐妹女王:克利奥帕特拉西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世,劳埃德·卢埃林-琼斯和亚历克斯·麦考利著(评论)
以下是内容的简短摘录,而不是摘要:由:希腊化鼎盛时期的姐妹女王:克利奥帕特拉Thea和克利奥帕特拉III作者:劳埃德·卢埃林-琼斯和亚历克斯·麦考利。希腊化盛期的姐妹王后:克娄帕特拉·西娅和克娄帕特拉三世。伦敦和纽约:劳特利奇出版社,2023。页十三,275。170.00美元。ISBN 978-1-1386-3509-8。尽管有大量关于克利奥帕特拉七世的书籍,但其他托勒密人却很少受到传记作家的关注。然而,随着卢埃林-琼斯和麦考利将他们对克利奥帕特拉·西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世的研究加入到越来越多的关于早期托勒密的文集中,其中包括沃辛顿关于托勒密一世的著作,克莱曼关于贝莱妮斯二世的著作,以及卡尼关于Arsinoë二世的著作。因此,这是对希腊化世界的学术研究的一个受欢迎的补充。这本书讲述了两个女人的迷人故事,她们出生在特殊的环境中,但也以一种让学者和外行读者都感兴趣的方式创造了自己的成功。虽然《姐妹女王》的大部分内容都是对两位克利奥帕特拉的生活的详细描述,但卢埃林-琼斯和麦考利超越了传记,从更广泛的角度考虑了女王身份,并将托勒密统治的最后一个世纪重新定义为希腊化的鼎盛时期。作者认为,正如希腊化艺术已不再被视为“巴洛克”一样,希腊化盛期也值得复兴。正如作者在他们的“引言”中指出的,这两个克利奥帕特拉自己需要一些形象修复。19世纪末和20世纪初的报道强调他们的残忍,以至于把他们塑造成精神病患者。然而,Llewellyn-Jones和McAuley认为,女性在战略上运用王朝权力,并在希腊化盛期的规范范围内,他们将其描述为“传统、创新和即兴创作的奇妙混合”。(22)。在第一章(“作为托勒密王朝的重要性:背景中的皇家女性”)提供了希腊化王朝中女性的公共和私人生活背景以及托勒密王朝的基本品质之后,作者用两章(“公主到女王”和“母亲,妻子,女王”)来描述公元前163-101年,这跨越了克娄巴特拉·西娅和克娄巴特拉三世的生活。在此过程中,他们还详细介绍了克利奥帕特拉二世生活的关键时期。第四章“名义上的皇后”;形象的女王地位;《实践中的女王地位》脱离了叙事传记,将克利奥帕特拉·西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世视为希腊化君主制管理系统的一部分。作者旨在回答以下问题:“这些王室女性的公众形象是怎样的?”在塑造她的身份和形象的过程中,女王扮演了什么角色?”(179 - 80)。对克利奥帕特拉的王室头衔进行分析,就可以回答第一个问题:这些女王受益于一个已经制度化的女性权力体系。为了回答第二个问题,作者回顾了女王的传记,以“确定一致的议程”,表明他们在管理帝国方面的参与和代理(198)。对于克利奥帕特拉·西娅来说,作者认为外交是她维持叙利亚稳定的关键策略。在埃及,克利奥帕特拉三世把重点放在经济上,利用埃及不断增长的财富为勘探和雄心勃勃的建筑项目提供资金,比如丹德拉神庙。第五章,“快进:五部曲”,通过克利奥帕特拉·西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世在克利奥帕特拉三世死后的50年里对后世塞琉古王朝和托勒密王朝的影响,评估了她们的重要性。在那里,作者认为克利奥帕特拉西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世作为克利奥帕特拉七世的榜样被低估了。一个简短的结语探讨了克利奥帕特拉·西娅和克利奥帕特拉三世之间的关系,认为希腊君主制代表的不是一个人的单一统治,而是一个家庭的统治。从这个意义上说,两个克利奥帕特拉在一个更大的王朝体系中是密不可分的。在这本优秀的书中,卢埃林-琼斯和麦考利对两位克利奥帕特拉及其兴盛的历史时期进行了细致的研究和高度可读的处理。《希腊化盛期的姐妹女王》不仅仅是一本传记,它让人们对公元前2世纪的希腊语世界产生了欢迎的关注。与…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CLASSICAL WORLD
CLASSICAL WORLD CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Classical World (ISSN 0009-8418) is the quarterly journal of The Classical Association of the Atlantic States, published on a seasonal schedule with Fall (September-November), Winter (December-February), Spring (March-May), and Summer (June-August) issues. Begun in 1907 as The Classical Weekly, this peer-reviewed journal publishes contributions on all aspects of Greek and Roman literature, history, and society.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信