Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients having colon and rectal anastomoses.

P Ryan, S Schweitzer, B Collopy, D Taylor
{"title":"Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients having colon and rectal anastomoses.","authors":"P Ryan,&nbsp;S Schweitzer,&nbsp;B Collopy,&nbsp;D Taylor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three retrospective studies were conducted at St. Vincent's Hospital to compare the outcomes of colorectal anastomoses, with and without resections, with respect to anesthetic technique. Operations were performed upon patients anesthetized with either combined regional (epidural) and general anesthesia (CRAG) or general anesthesia alone (GA). Postoperative pain relief was achieved with either continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) in the CRAG group or with postoperative narcotics in the GA groups (GA/PN). In one group, a different regimen was introduced: combined epidural and general anesthesia with postoperative epidural morphine (CRAG/EDM). Overall, anastomotic leak rates and death rates were lower in the CRAG group, and the lowest incidence of anastomotic leak was reported in the patients receiving CEA. Thus the reduced leak rate was associated more with the postoperative analgesia regimen than with the anesthetic technique. An increased incidence of wound dehiscence occurred with postoperative epidural morphine analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7309,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"550 ","pages":"146-9; discussion 149-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three retrospective studies were conducted at St. Vincent's Hospital to compare the outcomes of colorectal anastomoses, with and without resections, with respect to anesthetic technique. Operations were performed upon patients anesthetized with either combined regional (epidural) and general anesthesia (CRAG) or general anesthesia alone (GA). Postoperative pain relief was achieved with either continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) in the CRAG group or with postoperative narcotics in the GA groups (GA/PN). In one group, a different regimen was introduced: combined epidural and general anesthesia with postoperative epidural morphine (CRAG/EDM). Overall, anastomotic leak rates and death rates were lower in the CRAG group, and the lowest incidence of anastomotic leak was reported in the patients receiving CEA. Thus the reduced leak rate was associated more with the postoperative analgesia regimen than with the anesthetic technique. An increased incidence of wound dehiscence occurred with postoperative epidural morphine analgesia.

硬膜外和全身麻醉对结肠直肠吻合术患者的影响。
在圣文森特医院进行了三项回顾性研究,比较结直肠吻合术在麻醉技术方面的结果,切除和不切除。对局部(硬膜外)和全身麻醉(CRAG)或单独全身麻醉(GA)麻醉的患者进行手术。CRAG组通过持续硬膜外镇痛(CEA)或GA组(GA/PN)使用术后麻醉药实现术后疼痛缓解。在一组中,引入了不同的方案:硬膜外和全身麻醉联合术后硬膜外吗啡(CRAG/EDM)。总体而言,CRAG组吻合口瘘发生率和死亡率较低,CEA组吻合口瘘发生率最低。因此,减少泄漏率更多地与术后镇痛方案有关,而不是与麻醉技术有关。术后硬膜外吗啡镇痛增加了伤口裂开的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信