The influence of luxury brand personality on digital interaction evaluations: a focus on European and North American markets

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Kirsten Cowan, Alena Kostyk
{"title":"The influence of luxury brand personality on digital interaction evaluations: a focus on European and North American markets","authors":"Kirsten Cowan, Alena Kostyk","doi":"10.1108/imr-02-2022-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Do luxury consumers negatively evaluate digital interactions (website and social media) by international luxury brands? The topic has received much debate. The authors argue that luxury brand personality (modern vs. traditional), which encompasses a more stable form of brand identity in global markets, affects evaluations of digital interactions. They further investigate the role of self-brand connection in this process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Three experiments on Prolific use a European sample and manipulate a single factor between subjects (modernity: less vs. more; traditionality: less vs. more) of French luxury brands and measure evaluations as the dependent variable. Two studies assesses self-brand connection (continuous) as a moderator (studies 2a, 2b). Study 2b rules out some alternative explanations, with culture (independent vs. collectivist) as an independent variable. A fourth study, using a North American sample on CloudResearch, assesses the effect of personality manipulation (more modernity vs. more traditionality) on consumer evaluations of an Italian brand, and assesses ubiquity perceptions as a mediator.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Consumers evaluate digital interactions of international luxury brands less favorably when luxury brand personality exhibits more (vs. less) modernity or less (vs. more) traditionality. Perceptions of ubiquity mediate these relationships. When self-brand connection is high, this effect is attenuated.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The research sheds light on the debate on whether luxury brands should create digital interactions in international markets, given that these global brands operate in multiple channels. Findings show that luxury brands can develop strategies based on aspects of their brand identity, a less malleable feature of brand identity within global markets. Additionally, the research contributes to the conversation about a global luxury market. In short, the findings offer evidence in favor of brand identity (personality) influencing the digital channel strategy a brand should undertake in international markets, first, followed by consumer needs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14456,"journal":{"name":"International Marketing Review","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Marketing Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-02-2022-0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Do luxury consumers negatively evaluate digital interactions (website and social media) by international luxury brands? The topic has received much debate. The authors argue that luxury brand personality (modern vs. traditional), which encompasses a more stable form of brand identity in global markets, affects evaluations of digital interactions. They further investigate the role of self-brand connection in this process.

Design/methodology/approach

Three experiments on Prolific use a European sample and manipulate a single factor between subjects (modernity: less vs. more; traditionality: less vs. more) of French luxury brands and measure evaluations as the dependent variable. Two studies assesses self-brand connection (continuous) as a moderator (studies 2a, 2b). Study 2b rules out some alternative explanations, with culture (independent vs. collectivist) as an independent variable. A fourth study, using a North American sample on CloudResearch, assesses the effect of personality manipulation (more modernity vs. more traditionality) on consumer evaluations of an Italian brand, and assesses ubiquity perceptions as a mediator.

Findings

Consumers evaluate digital interactions of international luxury brands less favorably when luxury brand personality exhibits more (vs. less) modernity or less (vs. more) traditionality. Perceptions of ubiquity mediate these relationships. When self-brand connection is high, this effect is attenuated.

Originality/value

The research sheds light on the debate on whether luxury brands should create digital interactions in international markets, given that these global brands operate in multiple channels. Findings show that luxury brands can develop strategies based on aspects of their brand identity, a less malleable feature of brand identity within global markets. Additionally, the research contributes to the conversation about a global luxury market. In short, the findings offer evidence in favor of brand identity (personality) influencing the digital channel strategy a brand should undertake in international markets, first, followed by consumer needs.

奢侈品牌个性对数字互动评价的影响:以欧洲和北美市场为重点
奢侈品消费者是否对国际奢侈品牌的数字互动(网站和社交媒体)持负面评价?这个话题引起了很多争论。作者认为,奢侈品牌个性(现代与传统)在全球市场中包含了一种更稳定的品牌身份形式,影响了对数字互动的评估。他们进一步研究了自我品牌联系在这一过程中的作用。设计/方法/方法:《多产》的三个实验使用欧洲样本,并在受试者之间操纵单一因素(现代性:少与多;传统:少vs.多)的法国奢侈品牌和衡量评价作为因变量。两项研究评估了自我品牌连接(持续)作为调节因素(研究2a, 2b)。研究2b排除了一些替代解释,将文化(独立vs集体主义)作为一个自变量。第四项研究使用了CloudResearch的北美样本,评估了个性操纵(更现代与更传统)对消费者对意大利品牌评价的影响,并评估了无处不在的感知作为中介。当奢侈品牌的个性表现出更多(相对较少)的现代性或更少(相对较多)的传统性时,消费者对国际奢侈品牌的数字互动的评价就会降低。对无处不在的感知调解了这些关系。当自我品牌连接度高时,这种效应减弱。该研究揭示了奢侈品牌是否应该在国际市场上创造数字互动的争论,因为这些全球品牌通过多种渠道运营。研究结果表明,奢侈品牌可以根据其品牌形象的各个方面制定战略,这是全球市场中品牌形象的一个较不具可塑性的特征。此外,这项研究有助于全球奢侈品市场的讨论。简而言之,研究结果提供了支持品牌认同(个性)影响品牌在国际市场上应该采取的数字渠道战略的证据,其次是消费者需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: International Marketing Review (IMR) is a journal that has, as its core remit, the goal of publishing research that pushes back the boundaries of international marketing knowledge. IMR does this by publishing novel research ideas, and by publishing papers that add substance to, question the basic assumptions of, reframe, or otherwise shape what we think we know within in the international marketing field. IMR is pluralistic, publishing papers that are conceptual, quantitative-empirical, or qualitative-empirical. At IMR, we aim to be a journal that recognizes great papers and great research ideas, and works hard with authors to nurture those ideas through to publication. We aim to be a journal that is proactive in developing the research agenda in international marketing, by identifying critical research issues, and promoting research within those areas. Finally, IMR is a journal that is comfortable exploring, and that fosters the exploration of, the interfaces and overlaps between international marketing and other business disciplines. Where no interfaces or overlaps exist, IMR will be a journal that is ready to create them. IMR’s definition of international marketing is purposefully broad and includes, although is not restricted to: -International market entry decisions and relationships; -Export marketing and supply chain issues; -International retailing; -International channel management; -Consumer ethnocentrism, country and product image and origin effects; -Cultural considerations in international marketing; -International marketing strategy; -Aspects of international marketing management such as international branding, advertising and new product development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信