Volcanogenic Cretaceous of Northeast Asia: Taphofloras of the Ul’ya and Urak Interfluve (on the Knowledge of E.L. Lebedev’s Legacy)

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOLOGY
S. V. Shczepetov, A. B. Herman
{"title":"Volcanogenic Cretaceous of Northeast Asia: Taphofloras of the Ul’ya and Urak Interfluve (on the Knowledge of E.L. Lebedev’s Legacy)","authors":"S. V. Shczepetov, A. B. Herman","doi":"10.1134/s0869593823070018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>In the 1970s, the geological mapping in Northeast Asia, in the Ul’ya–Urak interfluve was undertaken by the Aerogeologiya research and production enterprise, while E.L. Lebedev, an employee of the Geological Institute, USSR Academy of Sciences, collected plant fossils. Together with geologists of that enterprise, he developed a new stratigraphic chart of the region, which turned out to be incorrect, as appeared later, being based on ideas on the floral development in the mid-Cretaceous time. Lebedev made vast collections that include several thousand remains of ancient plants. However, this material turned out to be attributed to nonexistent stratigraphic units. This made it of little use for further study. Our investigation has demonstrated that the most representative collections made by Lebedev in the Ul’ya–Urak interfluve (taphofloras of the sites 101 and 107–110, 28, 20, 25, 27, 70–78, 153, 154) come from the first sequence of felsic volcanics of the homodromous succession of volcanism in the Okhotsk–Chukotka Volcanogenic Belt. In the Ul’ya Trough, this sequence was initially called the Amka Formation. It is shown that the previously collected palaeofloristic material is quite representative and in general is of a good preservation. In the future, it could be monographically studied and described as a large regional palaeofloristic and phytostratigraphic object—the Ul’ya flora.</p>","PeriodicalId":51168,"journal":{"name":"Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0869593823070018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1970s, the geological mapping in Northeast Asia, in the Ul’ya–Urak interfluve was undertaken by the Aerogeologiya research and production enterprise, while E.L. Lebedev, an employee of the Geological Institute, USSR Academy of Sciences, collected plant fossils. Together with geologists of that enterprise, he developed a new stratigraphic chart of the region, which turned out to be incorrect, as appeared later, being based on ideas on the floral development in the mid-Cretaceous time. Lebedev made vast collections that include several thousand remains of ancient plants. However, this material turned out to be attributed to nonexistent stratigraphic units. This made it of little use for further study. Our investigation has demonstrated that the most representative collections made by Lebedev in the Ul’ya–Urak interfluve (taphofloras of the sites 101 and 107–110, 28, 20, 25, 27, 70–78, 153, 154) come from the first sequence of felsic volcanics of the homodromous succession of volcanism in the Okhotsk–Chukotka Volcanogenic Belt. In the Ul’ya Trough, this sequence was initially called the Amka Formation. It is shown that the previously collected palaeofloristic material is quite representative and in general is of a good preservation. In the future, it could be monographically studied and described as a large regional palaeofloristic and phytostratigraphic object—the Ul’ya flora.

Abstract Image

东北亚生火山白垩纪:乌尔雅和乌拉克断裂带的植物群(兼论列别捷夫遗产的知识)
20世纪70年代,在苏联科学院地质研究所工作人员列别捷夫(E.L. Lebedev)收集植物化石的同时,由航空地质研究和生产企业负责东北亚地区乌尔亚-乌尔拉克断裂带的地质填图工作。他和该公司的地质学家一起,绘制了一幅该地区的新地层图。后来发现,这种地层图是不正确的,因为它是根据白垩纪中期植物发育的观点绘制的。列别捷夫收藏了大量的植物,其中包括数千种古代植物的遗迹。然而,这些材料原来是属于不存在的地层单位。这使得它对进一步的研究没有多大用处。研究表明,列别捷夫在乌尔亚—乌拉克断裂带中最具代表性的收集物(101、107—110、28、20、25、27、70—78、153、154等遗址的植物群)来自于鄂霍次克—楚科奇火山带同源序列的长英质火山岩第一层序。在乌尔亚海槽,这个层序最初被称为阿姆卡组。结果表明,以往收集到的古植物区系资料具有较强的代表性,总体上保存较好。在未来,它可以作为一个大型区域性古植物区系和植物地层学对象——乌尔雅区系进行专题研究和描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
30.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation is the only journal that provides comprehensive coverage of the fundamental and applied aspects of stratigraphy and the correlation of geologic events and processes in time and space. Articles are based on the results of multidisciplinary studies and are for researchers, university professors, students, and geologists interested in stratigraphy and the chronological features of the world’s geological record.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信