{"title":"Internalised Gay Ageism: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Minority Stressors in Urban Mumbai","authors":"Anupam Joya Sharma, Malavika Ambale Subramanyam","doi":"10.1007/s12115-023-00946-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Middle-aged and older queer men are socially invisible across the world, especially in countries with a long history of criminalisation of homosexuality, such as India. The heteronormative society they grew up in and the perceived ageist gay culture within the queer community have contributed to the development of two stressors—internalised homophobia and internalised ageism, respectively—as adapted from Meyer’s minority stress model. However, the convergence of the two minority stressors can potentially affect the psychological well-being of individuals uniquely and is under-researched. Using in-depth interviews with 30 middle-aged to older gay men in urban Mumbai, India, the study contextualised this merged minority stressor in India—internalised gay ageism. Thematic analysis revealed three themes that discussed the social triggers leading to internalised homophobia, perceptions about ageism, and the development of internalised gay ageism among the participants. While participants presented with internalised homophobia and internalised ageism separately, the narratives also indicated the prevalence of internalised gay ageism, which likely influenced their late-life decision-making. By questioning the intersection of different minority stressors, this study underscores the need to understand further the complex impact of ageing on the psychological well-being of queer men in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":47267,"journal":{"name":"Society","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00946-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Middle-aged and older queer men are socially invisible across the world, especially in countries with a long history of criminalisation of homosexuality, such as India. The heteronormative society they grew up in and the perceived ageist gay culture within the queer community have contributed to the development of two stressors—internalised homophobia and internalised ageism, respectively—as adapted from Meyer’s minority stress model. However, the convergence of the two minority stressors can potentially affect the psychological well-being of individuals uniquely and is under-researched. Using in-depth interviews with 30 middle-aged to older gay men in urban Mumbai, India, the study contextualised this merged minority stressor in India—internalised gay ageism. Thematic analysis revealed three themes that discussed the social triggers leading to internalised homophobia, perceptions about ageism, and the development of internalised gay ageism among the participants. While participants presented with internalised homophobia and internalised ageism separately, the narratives also indicated the prevalence of internalised gay ageism, which likely influenced their late-life decision-making. By questioning the intersection of different minority stressors, this study underscores the need to understand further the complex impact of ageing on the psychological well-being of queer men in India.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1962, Society enjoys a wide reputation as a journal that publishes the latest scholarship on the central questions of contemporary society. It produces six issues a year offering new ideas and quality research in the social sciences and humanities in a clear, accessible style.
Society sees itself as occupying the vital center in intellectual and political debate. Put negatively, this means the journal is opposed to all forms of dogmatism, absolutism, ideological uniformity, and facile relativism. More positively, it seeks to champion genuine diversity of opinion and a recognition of the complexity of the world''s issues.
Society includes full-length research articles, commentaries, discussion pieces, and book reviews which critically examine work conducted in the social sciences as well as the humanities. The journal is of interest to scholars and researchers who work in these broadly-based fields of enquiry and those who conduct research in neighboring intellectual domains. Society is also of interest to non-specialists who are keen to understand the latest developments in such subjects as sociology, history, political science, social anthropology, philosophy, economics, and psychology.
The journal’s interdisciplinary approach is reflected in the variety of esteemed thinkers who have contributed to Society since its inception. Contributors have included Simone de Beauvoir, Robert K Merton, James Q. Wilson, Margaret Mead, Abraham Maslow, Richard Hoggart, William Julius Wilson, Arlie Hochschild, Alvin Gouldner, Orlando Patterson, Katherine S. Newman, Patrick Moynihan, Claude Levi-Strauss, Hans Morgenthau, David Riesman, Amitai Etzioni and many other eminent thought leaders.
The success of the journal rests on attracting authors who combine originality of thought and lucidity of expression. In that spirit, Society is keen to publish both established and new authors who have something significant to say about the important issues of our time.