{"title":"‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’","authors":"Marta Andersson","doi":"10.1075/prag.21014.and","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper embarks on a functional analysis of impolite language use in discussions about the response to the pandemic of Covid-19 on the official Facebook page of the Swedish national public television broadcaster in the spring of 2020. Having combined the existing models of impoliteness (Culpeper 2016) with the Appraisal theory (Martin and White 2005) in a both quantitative and qualitative investigation, the study finds remarkable differences between supporters and opponents of the Swedish tactic in terms of enactment of value orientations categorized as different attitudes within the Appraisal framework. More specifically, opponents tend to voice more subjective and affectual sentiments, whereas supporters generally derive their attitude from the Swedish institutional norms and cultural standards, resulting in more judgement. As the study concludes, these findings are related to the inherent dichotomy of the Swedish welfare state paradigm, which integrates the concepts of both state and individual citizen liability.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21014.and","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper embarks on a functional analysis of impolite language use in discussions about the response to the pandemic of Covid-19 on the official Facebook page of the Swedish national public television broadcaster in the spring of 2020. Having combined the existing models of impoliteness (Culpeper 2016) with the Appraisal theory (Martin and White 2005) in a both quantitative and qualitative investigation, the study finds remarkable differences between supporters and opponents of the Swedish tactic in terms of enactment of value orientations categorized as different attitudes within the Appraisal framework. More specifically, opponents tend to voice more subjective and affectual sentiments, whereas supporters generally derive their attitude from the Swedish institutional norms and cultural standards, resulting in more judgement. As the study concludes, these findings are related to the inherent dichotomy of the Swedish welfare state paradigm, which integrates the concepts of both state and individual citizen liability.
本文对2020年春季瑞典国家公共电视广播公司Facebook官方页面上关于应对Covid-19大流行的讨论中不礼貌语言的使用进行了功能分析。在定量和定性调查中,将现有的不礼貌模型(Culpeper 2016)与评估理论(Martin and White 2005)相结合,研究发现瑞典策略的支持者和反对者在制定价值取向方面存在显着差异,这些价值取向在评估框架内被归类为不同的态度。更具体地说,反对者倾向于表达更主观和情感的情绪,而支持者的态度通常来自瑞典的制度规范和文化标准,从而导致更多的判断。正如研究总结的那样,这些发现与瑞典福利国家范式的固有二分法有关,该范式整合了国家和公民个人责任的概念。