An analysis of perspectives on groundwater governance arrangements relating to the potential development of unconventional oil and gas in South Africa

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jack R. Hemingway, Alexandra Gormally-Sutton
{"title":"An analysis of perspectives on groundwater governance arrangements relating to the potential development of unconventional oil and gas in South Africa","authors":"Jack R. Hemingway, Alexandra Gormally-Sutton","doi":"10.1007/s10040-023-02742-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An analysis of expert perspectives on groundwater governance arrangements in South Africa is presented, particularly those arrangements that are pertinent to the complex and socially and ecologically significant implications of exploiting unconventional oil and gas (UOG). The paper presents a detailed assessment of literature on groundwater governance research, the findings of which are applied as a framework for a series of expert interviews, comprising hydrogeologists, lawyers, engineers, and governance specialists. This methodological approach was adopted as a means to enable an analysis of opinions on the current situation of groundwater governance in South Africa and how fit-for-purpose this is for managing the exploitation of UOG. The analysis was also informed by observation of participants at several relevant decision-making and stakeholder events. Whilst the findings indicated a generally positive evaluation of the initial steps taken to assess UOG impacts and engage relevant communities, recurrent criticisms also are featured across the interviews. Key implications arising from the research include: (1) the need for continued stakeholder engagement, and government follow-through on the outcomes of these processes, (2) the necessity for detailed groundwater-specific regulations to be drafted at the earliest opportunity, to ensure that the energy policy vacuum does not have a negative knock-on effect for effective groundwater management, and (3) the prevalence of significant governance gaps, particularly regarding regulatory and institutional capacity, and the need for continued development of a functional network of institutions to effectively manage UOG exploitation alongside groundwater resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02742-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An analysis of expert perspectives on groundwater governance arrangements in South Africa is presented, particularly those arrangements that are pertinent to the complex and socially and ecologically significant implications of exploiting unconventional oil and gas (UOG). The paper presents a detailed assessment of literature on groundwater governance research, the findings of which are applied as a framework for a series of expert interviews, comprising hydrogeologists, lawyers, engineers, and governance specialists. This methodological approach was adopted as a means to enable an analysis of opinions on the current situation of groundwater governance in South Africa and how fit-for-purpose this is for managing the exploitation of UOG. The analysis was also informed by observation of participants at several relevant decision-making and stakeholder events. Whilst the findings indicated a generally positive evaluation of the initial steps taken to assess UOG impacts and engage relevant communities, recurrent criticisms also are featured across the interviews. Key implications arising from the research include: (1) the need for continued stakeholder engagement, and government follow-through on the outcomes of these processes, (2) the necessity for detailed groundwater-specific regulations to be drafted at the earliest opportunity, to ensure that the energy policy vacuum does not have a negative knock-on effect for effective groundwater management, and (3) the prevalence of significant governance gaps, particularly regarding regulatory and institutional capacity, and the need for continued development of a functional network of institutions to effectively manage UOG exploitation alongside groundwater resources.

Abstract Image

对与南非非常规石油和天然气潜在开发有关的地下水治理安排的观点分析
提出了对南非地下水治理安排的专家观点的分析,特别是那些与开发非常规石油和天然气(UOG)的复杂和社会和生态重大影响有关的安排。本文对地下水治理研究的文献进行了详细的评估,其中的发现被应用为一系列专家访谈的框架,包括水文地质学家、律师、工程师和治理专家。采用这一方法方法是为了分析对南非地下水管理现状的意见,以及对管理地下水开采的目的是否合适。分析还通过观察参与者在几个相关的决策和利益相关者事件。虽然调查结果表明,在评估UOG的影响和吸引相关社区参与方面所采取的初步步骤总体上得到了积极的评价,但在访谈中也经常出现批评。这项研究产生的主要影响包括:(1)利益相关者持续参与的必要性,以及政府对这些过程结果的后续跟进;(2)有必要尽早起草详细的地下水特定法规,以确保能源政策真空不会对有效的地下水管理产生负面的连锁效应;(3)普遍存在重大的治理差距,特别是在监管和机构能力方面;需要继续发展一个机构的功能网络,以便有效地管理地下水资源和UOG的开采。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信