Reactive response to predation risk affects foraging time of hares, yet not their phosphorus intake

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Samara Brandsen, Louise S. Vermorken, Henry J. Kuipers, Sip E. van Wieren, Inger K. de Jonge, Martijn J. A. Weterings
{"title":"Reactive response to predation risk affects foraging time of hares, yet not their phosphorus intake","authors":"Samara Brandsen, Louise S. Vermorken, Henry J. Kuipers, Sip E. van Wieren, Inger K. de Jonge, Martijn J. A. Weterings","doi":"10.1007/s42991-023-00385-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antipredator responses could affect nutrient intake, which could lead to nutritional deficits. However, little is known about the antipredator response of small herbivores because most are nocturnal or crepuscular and therefore very difficult to study in the field. Therefore, we experimentally assessed the effect of a reactive response to predation risk on the nutrient (i.e., phosphorous) intake of the European hare (<i>Lepus europaeus</i>) using three different playback sounds. Additionally, we studied the time spent being costly vigilant, the time spent foraging, and the vegetation height in which the hares were present using accelerometers and GPS. Our results showed that elevated predation risk from our playback experiment did not affect the (1) phosphorus intake, (2) time spent being costly vigilant, and (3) time spent in tall vegetation. However, elevated predation risk did increase the time spent foraging. Possibly hares spent more time foraging with an increased predation risk because hares cannot seek refuge from predators. Additionally, the effect on phosphorus intake could be weak because phosphorous intake does not benefit a flight escape, while the reactive response acts late in the predation sequence limiting the effect on hare ecology. Prey anti-predator responses seem strongly related to the escape tactics of prey species that can differ between different habitats and the time of the day. More detailed field studies are necessary to get a better insight into species’ anti-predator-food tactics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49888,"journal":{"name":"Mammalian Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammalian Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-023-00385-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antipredator responses could affect nutrient intake, which could lead to nutritional deficits. However, little is known about the antipredator response of small herbivores because most are nocturnal or crepuscular and therefore very difficult to study in the field. Therefore, we experimentally assessed the effect of a reactive response to predation risk on the nutrient (i.e., phosphorous) intake of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) using three different playback sounds. Additionally, we studied the time spent being costly vigilant, the time spent foraging, and the vegetation height in which the hares were present using accelerometers and GPS. Our results showed that elevated predation risk from our playback experiment did not affect the (1) phosphorus intake, (2) time spent being costly vigilant, and (3) time spent in tall vegetation. However, elevated predation risk did increase the time spent foraging. Possibly hares spent more time foraging with an increased predation risk because hares cannot seek refuge from predators. Additionally, the effect on phosphorus intake could be weak because phosphorous intake does not benefit a flight escape, while the reactive response acts late in the predation sequence limiting the effect on hare ecology. Prey anti-predator responses seem strongly related to the escape tactics of prey species that can differ between different habitats and the time of the day. More detailed field studies are necessary to get a better insight into species’ anti-predator-food tactics.

Abstract Image

对捕食风险的反应性反应影响兔的觅食时间,但不影响其磷摄入量
对抗捕食者的反应可能会影响营养摄入,从而导致营养不足。然而,由于小型食草动物大多在夜间或黄昏活动,因此对它们的抗捕食反应知之甚少,因此很难在野外进行研究。因此,我们通过实验评估了对捕食风险的反应性反应对欧洲兔(Lepus europaeus)营养物质(即磷)摄入量的影响,使用了三种不同的播放声音。此外,我们还使用加速度计和GPS研究了野兔花费的警戒时间、觅食时间和野兔所在的植被高度。我们的研究结果表明,从我们的回放实验中增加的捕食风险并不影响(1)磷摄入量,(2)花费昂贵的警惕时间,以及(3)在高植被上花费的时间。然而,捕食风险的增加确实增加了觅食的时间。可能野兔花了更多的时间觅食,增加了被捕食的风险,因为野兔无法躲避捕食者。此外,对磷素摄入的影响可能较弱,因为磷素摄入对逃跑没有好处,而反应性反应发生在捕食序列的后期,限制了对生态的影响。猎物反捕食者的反应似乎与猎物的逃脱策略密切相关,这些策略在不同的栖息地和一天中的不同时间会有所不同。为了更好地了解物种对抗捕食者食物的策略,更详细的实地研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mammalian Biology
Mammalian Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
127
审稿时长
10.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammalian Biology (formerly Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde) is an international scientific journal edited by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde (German Society for Mammalian Biology). The journal is devoted to the publication of research on mammals. Its scope covers all aspects of mammalian biology, such as anatomy, morphology, palaeontology, taxonomy, systematics, molecular biology, physiology, neurobiology, ethology, genetics, reproduction, development, evolutionary biology, domestication, ecology, wildlife biology and diseases, conservation biology, and the biology of zoo mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信