Limits on the accuracy of contact inhibition of locomotion

Wei Wang, Brian A. Camley
{"title":"Limits on the accuracy of contact inhibition of locomotion","authors":"Wei Wang, Brian A. Camley","doi":"arxiv-2311.00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cells that collide with each other repolarize away from contact, in a process\ncalled contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL), which is necessary for correct\ndevelopment of the embryo. CIL can occur even when cells make a micron-scale\ncontact with a neighbor - much smaller than their size. How precisely can a\ncell sense cell-cell contact and repolarize in the correct direction? What\nfactors control whether a cell recognizes it has contacted a neighbor? We\npropose a theoretical model for the limits of CIL where cells recognize the\npresence of another cell by binding the protein ephrin with the Eph receptor.\nThis recognition is made difficult by the presence of interfering ligands that\nbind nonspecifically. Both theoretical predictions and simulation results show\nthat it becomes more difficult to sense cell-cell contact when it is difficult\nto distinguish ephrin from the interfering ligands, or when there are more\ninterfering ligands, or when the contact width decreases. However, the error of\nestimating contact position remains almost constant when the contact width\nchanges. This happens because the cell gains spatial information largely from\nthe boundaries of cell-cell contact. We study using statistical decision theory\nthe likelihood of a false positive CIL event in the absence of cell-cell\ncontact, and the likelihood of a false negative where CIL does not occur when\nanother cell is present. Our results suggest that the cell is more likely to\nmake incorrect decisions when the contact width is very small or so large that\nit nears the cell's perimeter. However, in general, we find that cells have the\nability to make reasonably reliable CIL decisions even for very narrow\n(micron-scale) contacts, even if the concentration of interfering ligands is\nten times that of the correct ligands.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cells that collide with each other repolarize away from contact, in a process called contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL), which is necessary for correct development of the embryo. CIL can occur even when cells make a micron-scale contact with a neighbor - much smaller than their size. How precisely can a cell sense cell-cell contact and repolarize in the correct direction? What factors control whether a cell recognizes it has contacted a neighbor? We propose a theoretical model for the limits of CIL where cells recognize the presence of another cell by binding the protein ephrin with the Eph receptor. This recognition is made difficult by the presence of interfering ligands that bind nonspecifically. Both theoretical predictions and simulation results show that it becomes more difficult to sense cell-cell contact when it is difficult to distinguish ephrin from the interfering ligands, or when there are more interfering ligands, or when the contact width decreases. However, the error of estimating contact position remains almost constant when the contact width changes. This happens because the cell gains spatial information largely from the boundaries of cell-cell contact. We study using statistical decision theory the likelihood of a false positive CIL event in the absence of cell-cell contact, and the likelihood of a false negative where CIL does not occur when another cell is present. Our results suggest that the cell is more likely to make incorrect decisions when the contact width is very small or so large that it nears the cell's perimeter. However, in general, we find that cells have the ability to make reasonably reliable CIL decisions even for very narrow (micron-scale) contacts, even if the concentration of interfering ligands is ten times that of the correct ligands.
运动接触抑制精度的限制
相互碰撞的细胞会重新极化,远离接触,这一过程被称为运动的接触抑制(CIL),这是胚胎正常发育所必需的。甚至当细胞与邻居进行微米级的接触时,CIL也会发生-比它们的大小小得多。细胞如何精确地感知细胞间的接触并在正确的方向上重极化?是什么因素控制着一个细胞是否识别出它已经联系了邻居?我们提出了一个理论模型的限制,在CIL中,细胞通过结合蛋白ephrin与Eph受体来识别另一个细胞的存在。由于存在非特异性结合的干扰配体,这种识别变得困难。理论预测和模拟结果都表明,当难以区分ephrin和干扰配体,或干扰配体较多,或接触宽度减小时,传感细胞-细胞接触变得更加困难。然而,当接触宽度变化时,估计接触位置的误差几乎保持不变。这是因为细胞主要从细胞间接触的边界获取空间信息。我们使用统计决策理论研究了在没有细胞接触的情况下CIL假阳性事件的可能性,以及当另一个细胞存在时CIL不发生的假阴性事件的可能性。我们的结果表明,当接触宽度非常小或太大以至于接近细胞的周长时,细胞更有可能做出错误的决定。然而,一般来说,我们发现细胞有能力做出相当可靠的CIL决定,即使是非常窄的(微米尺度)接触,即使干扰配体的浓度是正确配体的浓度的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信