Yue LiuMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Kevin SuhDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Philip K. MainiMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Daniel J. CohenDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton UniversityDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Ruth E. BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford
{"title":"Parameter identifiability and model selection for partial differential equation models of cell invasion","authors":"Yue LiuMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Kevin SuhDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Philip K. MainiMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Daniel J. CohenDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton UniversityDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Ruth E. BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford","doi":"arxiv-2309.01476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When employing a mechanistic model to study biological systems, practical\nparameter identifiability is important for making predictions in a wide range\nof scenarios, as well as for understanding the mechanisms driving the system\nbehaviour. We argue that parameter identifiability should be considered\nalongside goodness-of-fit and model complexity as criteria for model selection.\nTo demonstrate, we use a profile likelihood approach to investigate parameter\nidentifiability for four extensions of the Fisher--KPP model, given\nexperimental data from a cell invasion assay. We show that more complicated\nmodels tend to be less identifiable, with parameter estimates being more\nsensitive to subtle differences in experimental procedures, and require more\ndata to be practically identifiable. The results from identifiability analysis\ncan inform model selection, as well as data collection and experimental design.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2309.01476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When employing a mechanistic model to study biological systems, practical
parameter identifiability is important for making predictions in a wide range
of scenarios, as well as for understanding the mechanisms driving the system
behaviour. We argue that parameter identifiability should be considered
alongside goodness-of-fit and model complexity as criteria for model selection.
To demonstrate, we use a profile likelihood approach to investigate parameter
identifiability for four extensions of the Fisher--KPP model, given
experimental data from a cell invasion assay. We show that more complicated
models tend to be less identifiable, with parameter estimates being more
sensitive to subtle differences in experimental procedures, and require more
data to be practically identifiable. The results from identifiability analysis
can inform model selection, as well as data collection and experimental design.