The Post-earnings Announcement Drift: A Pre-earnings Announcement Effect? A Multi-period Analysis

Abacus Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1111/abac.12265
A. William Richardson, Kevin Veenstra
{"title":"The Post-earnings Announcement Drift: A Pre-earnings Announcement Effect? A Multi-period Analysis","authors":"A. William Richardson, Kevin Veenstra","doi":"10.1111/abac.12265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) has been accepted as an anomaly to the efficient markets hypothesis. This drift subsequent to earnings announcements has been ascribed to the incomplete incorporation by the market of the information in these earnings announcements. Interestingly, over the past five decades of extensive research, no rational economic explanation of the PEAD has been found. In addition, there has been no specific consideration of the effect of new economic information <i>subsequent</i> to the earnings announcements. Our multi-year examination of the cumulative abnormal return (CAR) incorporates the effect of economic information <i>subsequent</i> to the earnings announcement of traditional PEAD studies. Our analysis shows that a drift of CAR versus time can arise without recourse to invoking market inefficiency. Our results are consistent for three samples covering the period 1974–2016. We do not assert that we prove that there is no component of the traditional PEAD due to market inefficiency. Rather, our results show that studies to determine whether there is a market inefficiency component of the PEAD should use a multi-period approach in order to account for the effect of economic information subsequent to the earnings announcements and thereby focus more precisely upon the cause of the PEAD reported in previous research studies.","PeriodicalId":501337,"journal":{"name":"Abacus","volume":"194 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many years, the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) has been accepted as an anomaly to the efficient markets hypothesis. This drift subsequent to earnings announcements has been ascribed to the incomplete incorporation by the market of the information in these earnings announcements. Interestingly, over the past five decades of extensive research, no rational economic explanation of the PEAD has been found. In addition, there has been no specific consideration of the effect of new economic information subsequent to the earnings announcements. Our multi-year examination of the cumulative abnormal return (CAR) incorporates the effect of economic information subsequent to the earnings announcement of traditional PEAD studies. Our analysis shows that a drift of CAR versus time can arise without recourse to invoking market inefficiency. Our results are consistent for three samples covering the period 1974–2016. We do not assert that we prove that there is no component of the traditional PEAD due to market inefficiency. Rather, our results show that studies to determine whether there is a market inefficiency component of the PEAD should use a multi-period approach in order to account for the effect of economic information subsequent to the earnings announcements and thereby focus more precisely upon the cause of the PEAD reported in previous research studies.
收益公告后漂移:收益公告前效应?多时期分析
多年来,收益公告后漂移(PEAD)一直被认为是有效市场假说的一个反常现象。收益公告之后的这种变动归因于市场未完全纳入这些收益公告中的信息。有趣的是,在过去50年的广泛研究中,没有发现对PEAD的合理经济解释。此外,没有具体考虑收益公告后新的经济信息的影响。我们对累积异常收益(CAR)的多年检验纳入了传统PEAD研究中盈余公告后经济信息的影响。我们的分析表明,如果不诉诸于市场无效,CAR随时间的漂移可能会出现。我们的结果与涵盖1974-2016年期间的三个样本一致。我们并没有断言我们证明由于市场效率低下而没有传统的PEAD成分。相反,我们的研究结果表明,确定PEAD是否存在市场无效率成分的研究应该使用多期方法,以便解释收益公告之后的经济信息的影响,从而更准确地关注先前研究中报告的PEAD的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信