Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Patients with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Yu Kondo, Takahiro Miki, Hiroshi Kurakata, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroshi Takasaki
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Patients with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Yu Kondo, Takahiro Miki, Hiroshi Kurakata, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroshi Takasaki","doi":"10.1007/s10942-022-00490-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) alone and in combination with physical interventions on pain, disability, quality of life, and psychological parameters in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). Several databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pooled effects were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Of the 2287 studies identified, 8 were included in the review, of which, 7 were suitable for meta-analysis. We found moderate-quality evidence that CBT does not provide different degrees of short-term (6 RCTs; SMD, − 0.20; 95% CI, − 0.50 to 0.10) or long-term improvement in disability (3 RCTs; SMD, − 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.46 to 0.10) than is indicated by other types of intervention comparison. Subgroup analyses indicated low-quality evidence that CBT alone has a medium to large effect on short-term improvement in disability (2 RCTs; SMD, − 0.61; 95% CI, − 1.21 to − 0.01) compared with wait-and-see control. Additionally, we found moderate-quality evidence that CBT, combined with physical interventions, has a small effect on long-term improvement in disability (2 RCTs; SMD, − 0.29; 95% CI, − 0.53 to − 0.06) compared with advice alone. No differences were found for pain or long-term quality of life. The study found moderately favorable evidence of the combined effect of physical interventions and CBT against advice alone in long-term disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":501324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00490-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) alone and in combination with physical interventions on pain, disability, quality of life, and psychological parameters in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). Several databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pooled effects were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Of the 2287 studies identified, 8 were included in the review, of which, 7 were suitable for meta-analysis. We found moderate-quality evidence that CBT does not provide different degrees of short-term (6 RCTs; SMD, − 0.20; 95% CI, − 0.50 to 0.10) or long-term improvement in disability (3 RCTs; SMD, − 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.46 to 0.10) than is indicated by other types of intervention comparison. Subgroup analyses indicated low-quality evidence that CBT alone has a medium to large effect on short-term improvement in disability (2 RCTs; SMD, − 0.61; 95% CI, − 1.21 to − 0.01) compared with wait-and-see control. Additionally, we found moderate-quality evidence that CBT, combined with physical interventions, has a small effect on long-term improvement in disability (2 RCTs; SMD, − 0.29; 95% CI, − 0.53 to − 0.06) compared with advice alone. No differences were found for pain or long-term quality of life. The study found moderately favorable evidence of the combined effect of physical interventions and CBT against advice alone in long-term disability.

Abstract Image

认知行为治疗对慢性鞭伤相关疾病患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
确定认知行为疗法(CBT)单独和联合物理干预对慢性鞭扭伤相关疾病(WADs)患者疼痛、残疾、生活质量和心理参数的有效性。系统地检索了几个数据库中的随机对照试验(rct)。合并效应以标准化平均差异(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)进行分析。我们使用推荐分级、评估、发展和评价方法评估证据质量。在确定的2287项研究中,有8项纳入了本综述,其中7项适合进行meta分析。我们发现中等质量的证据表明CBT并没有提供不同程度的短期治疗(6项随机对照试验;smd,−0.20;95% CI,−0.50 ~ 0.10)或残疾的长期改善(3项rct;smd,−0.18;95% CI,−0.46 ~ 0.10)比其他类型的干预比较显示。亚组分析显示,低质量的证据表明,单独CBT对短期残疾改善有中等到较大的影响(2项随机对照试验;smd,−0.61;95% CI, - 1.21至- 0.01)。此外,我们发现中等质量的证据表明,CBT与物理干预相结合,对残疾的长期改善效果很小(2项随机对照试验;smd,−0.29;95% CI, - 0.53至- 0.06)。在疼痛和长期生活质量方面没有发现差异。研究发现适度有利的证据表明,在长期残疾中,物理干预和认知行为治疗相结合的效果优于单独的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信