Action observation intervention using three - dimensional movies improves the usability of hands with distal radius fractures in daily life: a nonrandomized controlled trial in women

Kengo Usuki, Hiroaki Ueda, Toshiya Yamaguchi, Takako Suzuki, Toyohiro Hamaguchi
{"title":"Action observation intervention using three - dimensional movies improves the usability of hands with distal radius fractures in daily life: a nonrandomized controlled trial in women","authors":"Kengo Usuki, Hiroaki Ueda, Toshiya Yamaguchi, Takako Suzuki, Toyohiro Hamaguchi","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.19.23297832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prolonged immobilization of joints after distal radius fracture (DRF) leads to cerebral disuse-dependent plasticity (DDP) and deterioration of upper extremity function. Action observation therapy (AOT) can improve DDP. This nonrandomized controlled trial (UMIN 000039973) tested the hypothesis that AOT improves hand-use difficulties during activities of daily living in patients with DRF. Right-handed women with volar locking plate fixation for DRF were divided into AOT and Non-AOT groups for a 12-week intervention. The primary outcome was the difficulty in using the fractured hand, as examined by the Japanese version of the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes were (1) range of motion (ROM) of the injured side and (2) difference between the measured and patient-estimated ROM. The survey was conducted immediately postoperatively and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The AOT groups used a head-mounted display and three-dimensional video during ROM exercises, whereas the Non-AOT group used active ROM exercises alone. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to confirm interactions and main effects by group and time period, and multiple comparisons were performed. In total, 35 patients were assigned to the AOT (n=18, median age 74 years) and Non-AOT (n=17, 70 years) groups. In the GLM, PRWE Total, PRWE Specific, and PRWE Usual scores showed interactions between groups and periods. A post-hoc test showed that the PRWE Specific (z=3.43, p=0.02) and PRWE Usual (z=7.53, p<0.01) scores w ere significantly lower in the AOT group than in the Non-AOT group at 4 weeks postoperatively, whereas PRWE Total s cores (z=3.29, p=0.04) were lower at 8 weeks postoperatively. These results suggest that AOT can improve hand-use difficulties in right-handed women after DRF surgery. AOT positively affects the motor imagery of patients with DRF and can reverse the patient’s perceived difficulty of using the fractured hand during rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":501263,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","volume":"877 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.19.23297832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prolonged immobilization of joints after distal radius fracture (DRF) leads to cerebral disuse-dependent plasticity (DDP) and deterioration of upper extremity function. Action observation therapy (AOT) can improve DDP. This nonrandomized controlled trial (UMIN 000039973) tested the hypothesis that AOT improves hand-use difficulties during activities of daily living in patients with DRF. Right-handed women with volar locking plate fixation for DRF were divided into AOT and Non-AOT groups for a 12-week intervention. The primary outcome was the difficulty in using the fractured hand, as examined by the Japanese version of the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes were (1) range of motion (ROM) of the injured side and (2) difference between the measured and patient-estimated ROM. The survey was conducted immediately postoperatively and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The AOT groups used a head-mounted display and three-dimensional video during ROM exercises, whereas the Non-AOT group used active ROM exercises alone. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to confirm interactions and main effects by group and time period, and multiple comparisons were performed. In total, 35 patients were assigned to the AOT (n=18, median age 74 years) and Non-AOT (n=17, 70 years) groups. In the GLM, PRWE Total, PRWE Specific, and PRWE Usual scores showed interactions between groups and periods. A post-hoc test showed that the PRWE Specific (z=3.43, p=0.02) and PRWE Usual (z=7.53, p<0.01) scores w ere significantly lower in the AOT group than in the Non-AOT group at 4 weeks postoperatively, whereas PRWE Total s cores (z=3.29, p=0.04) were lower at 8 weeks postoperatively. These results suggest that AOT can improve hand-use difficulties in right-handed women after DRF surgery. AOT positively affects the motor imagery of patients with DRF and can reverse the patient’s perceived difficulty of using the fractured hand during rehabilitation.
使用三维电影的动作观察干预提高了桡骨远端骨折患者手在日常生活中的可用性:一项针对女性的非随机对照试验
桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后关节长时间固定导致脑废用依赖性可塑性(DDP)和上肢功能恶化。行动观察疗法(AOT)可改善DDP。这项非随机对照试验(UMIN 000039973)检验了AOT改善DRF患者日常生活活动中手部使用困难的假设。采用掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗DRF的右撇子女性分为AOT组和非AOT组,进行为期12周的干预。通过日本版患者相关腕关节评估(PRWE)的检查,主要结果是骨折手使用困难。次要结果是(1)受伤侧的活动范围(ROM)和(2)测量到的活动度与患者估计的活动度之间的差异。调查在术后立即进行,并在术后4周、8周和12周进行。AOT组在ROM练习中使用头戴式显示器和三维视频,而非AOT组仅使用主动ROM练习。采用广义线性模型(GLM)按组和时间段确定相互作用和主效应,并进行多重比较。共有35例患者被分为AOT组(n=18,中位年龄74岁)和非AOT组(n=17, 70岁)。在GLM中,PRWE Total、PRWE Specific和PRWE Usual得分显示了组与期之间的相互作用。事后检验显示,术后4周,AOT组PRWE Specific (z=3.43, p=0.02)和PRWE Usual (z=7.53, p= 0.01)评分明显低于非AOT组,而术后8周PRWE Total scores (z=3.29, p=0.04)评分明显低于非AOT组。这些结果表明辅助辅助治疗可以改善右利手女性DRF手术后的手部使用困难。AOT对DRF患者的运动意象有积极影响,可以逆转患者在康复过程中对骨折手的使用困难的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信