A New Challenging Curve Fitting Benchmark Test Set for Global Optimization Solvers

Peicong Cheng, Peicheng Cheng
{"title":"A New Challenging Curve Fitting Benchmark Test Set for Global Optimization Solvers","authors":"Peicong Cheng, Peicheng Cheng","doi":"arxiv-2312.01709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benchmark sets are extremely important for evaluating and developing global\noptimization algorithms and related solvers. A new test set named PCC benchmark\nis proposed especially for optimization problem of nonlinear curve fitting for\nthe first time, with the aspiration of investigating and comparing the\nperformance of different global optimization solvers. Compared with the\nwell-known classical nonlinear curve fitting benchmark set given by the\nNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of USA, the most\nimportant features of the PCC benchmark are small problem dimensions, free\nsearch domain and high level of difficulty for obtaining global optimization\nsolutions, which makes the PCC benchmark be not only suitable for validating\nthe effectiveness of various global optimization algorithms, but also more\nideal for verifying and comparing various solvers with global optimization\nsolving capabilities. Based on PCC and NIST benchmark, seven of the world's\nleading global optimization solvers, including Baron, Antigone, Couenne, Lingo,\nScip, Matlab GA and 1stOpt, are thoroughly tested and compared in terms of both\neffectiveness and efficiency. The results showed that the NIST benchmark is\nrelatively simple and not suitable for global optimization testing, while the\nPCC benchmark is a unique, challengeable and effective test dataset for testing\nand verifying global optimization algorithms and related solvers. 1stOpt solver\ngives the overall best performance in both NIST and PCC benchmark.","PeriodicalId":501256,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Mathematical Software","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Mathematical Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2312.01709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benchmark sets are extremely important for evaluating and developing global optimization algorithms and related solvers. A new test set named PCC benchmark is proposed especially for optimization problem of nonlinear curve fitting for the first time, with the aspiration of investigating and comparing the performance of different global optimization solvers. Compared with the well-known classical nonlinear curve fitting benchmark set given by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of USA, the most important features of the PCC benchmark are small problem dimensions, free search domain and high level of difficulty for obtaining global optimization solutions, which makes the PCC benchmark be not only suitable for validating the effectiveness of various global optimization algorithms, but also more ideal for verifying and comparing various solvers with global optimization solving capabilities. Based on PCC and NIST benchmark, seven of the world's leading global optimization solvers, including Baron, Antigone, Couenne, Lingo, Scip, Matlab GA and 1stOpt, are thoroughly tested and compared in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. The results showed that the NIST benchmark is relatively simple and not suitable for global optimization testing, while the PCC benchmark is a unique, challengeable and effective test dataset for testing and verifying global optimization algorithms and related solvers. 1stOpt solver gives the overall best performance in both NIST and PCC benchmark.
一种新的具有挑战性的曲线拟合基准测试集的全局优化求解器
基准集对于评估和开发全局优化算法和相关求解器非常重要。针对非线性曲线拟合优化问题,首次提出了一种新的测试集PCC基准,旨在研究和比较不同全局优化解的性能。与美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)给出的经典非线性曲线拟合基准集相比,PCC基准集最大的特点是问题维数小、研究范围广、获得全局优化解的难度高,这使得PCC基准集不仅适用于验证各种全局优化算法的有效性,而且适用于验证各种优化算法的有效性。但也更理想的验证和比较各种求解器与全局优化求解能力。基于PCC和NIST的基准,对Baron、Antigone、Couenne、Lingo、Scip、Matlab GA和1stOpt等7种世界领先的全局优化求解器进行了全面的测试和效率比较。结果表明,NIST基准相对简单,不适合全局优化测试,而pcc基准是测试和验证全局优化算法和相关求解器的独特、具有挑战性和有效的测试数据集。1stOpt求解器在NIST和PCC基准测试中都提供了最佳的总体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信