Bullying: current issues of commissioning and carrying out of expert psychological evidence in court

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Vitalii O. Khodanovych, Olesia V. Khodanovych, Valeriia O. Smirnova, Anna Yu. Ponomarenko
{"title":"Bullying: current issues of commissioning and carrying out of expert psychological evidence in court","authors":"Vitalii O. Khodanovych, Olesia V. Khodanovych, Valeriia O. Smirnova, Anna Yu. Ponomarenko","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2022.2044715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>The increased number of forensic psychological examinations in administrative cases of bullying and the lack of the theoretical basis for this type of forensic examination make the topic under consideration relevant. The article aims to study the forensic psychological examinations of bullying, the need for which arises in criminal and administrative proceedings, and suggest improvements of its problematic aspects. The methodological framework of the article consists of theoretical, diagnostic, and empirical methods, general psychological methods and principles, methods of mathematical statistics, and graphic representation of the results. The study has shown that the current stage in the development of forensic psychological examination of bullying is characterized by unequal treatment of both lawyers and psychologists. In the course of the research, the authors have developed and proposed the algorithm of forensic psychological examination. The material in this article may be of use to law enforcement officers, litigators, psychologists, and researchers specializing in research on bullying.</p>","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2022.2044715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The increased number of forensic psychological examinations in administrative cases of bullying and the lack of the theoretical basis for this type of forensic examination make the topic under consideration relevant. The article aims to study the forensic psychological examinations of bullying, the need for which arises in criminal and administrative proceedings, and suggest improvements of its problematic aspects. The methodological framework of the article consists of theoretical, diagnostic, and empirical methods, general psychological methods and principles, methods of mathematical statistics, and graphic representation of the results. The study has shown that the current stage in the development of forensic psychological examination of bullying is characterized by unequal treatment of both lawyers and psychologists. In the course of the research, the authors have developed and proposed the algorithm of forensic psychological examination. The material in this article may be of use to law enforcement officers, litigators, psychologists, and researchers specializing in research on bullying.

欺凌:在法庭上委托和执行专家心理证据的当前问题
摘要欺凌行政案件中法医心理检查的增多,以及此类法医检查缺乏理论依据,使得本课题的研究具有现实意义。本文旨在研究刑事和行政诉讼中对欺凌行为的法医心理检查的需要,并提出改进其问题方面的建议。本文的方法论框架包括理论、诊断和实证方法、一般心理学方法和原理、数理统计方法和结果的图形表示。研究表明,在现阶段欺凌行为的法医心理检查发展的特点是律师和心理学家的不平等待遇。在研究过程中,作者开发并提出了法医心理检测算法。本文中的材料可能对执法人员、诉讼律师、心理学家和专门从事欺凌研究的研究人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信