Together, we travel: empirical insights on human-robot collaborative order picking for retail warehousing

IF 7.2 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jonas Koreis, Dominic Loske, Matthias Klumpp
{"title":"Together, we travel: empirical insights on human-robot collaborative order picking for retail warehousing","authors":"Jonas Koreis, Dominic Loske, Matthias Klumpp","doi":"10.1108/ijlm-03-2023-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Increasing personnel costs and labour shortages have pushed retailers to give increasing attention to their intralogistics operations. We study hybrid order picking systems, in which humans and robots share work time, workspace and objectives and are in permanent contact. This necessitates a collaboration of humans and their mechanical coworkers (cobots).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Through a longitudinal case study on individual-level technology adaption, we accompanied a pilot testing of an industrial truck that automatically follows order pickers in their travel direction. Grounded on empirical field research and a unique large-scale data set comprising <em>N</em> = 2,086,260 storage location visits, where <em>N</em> = 57,239 storage location visits were performed in a hybrid setting and <em>N</em> = 2,029,021 in a manual setting, we applied a multilevel model to estimate the impact of this cobot settings on task performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>We show that cobot settings can reduce the time required for picking tasks by as much as 33.57%. Furthermore, practical factors such as product weight, pick density and travel distance mitigate this effect, suggesting that cobots are especially beneficial for short-distance orders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Given that the literature on hybrid order picking systems has primarily applied simulation approaches, the study is among the first to provide empirical evidence from a real-world setting. The results are discussed from the perspective of Industry 5.0 and can prevent managers from making investment decisions into ineffective robotic technology.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Logistics Management","volume":"282 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-03-2023-0127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Increasing personnel costs and labour shortages have pushed retailers to give increasing attention to their intralogistics operations. We study hybrid order picking systems, in which humans and robots share work time, workspace and objectives and are in permanent contact. This necessitates a collaboration of humans and their mechanical coworkers (cobots).

Design/methodology/approach

Through a longitudinal case study on individual-level technology adaption, we accompanied a pilot testing of an industrial truck that automatically follows order pickers in their travel direction. Grounded on empirical field research and a unique large-scale data set comprising N = 2,086,260 storage location visits, where N = 57,239 storage location visits were performed in a hybrid setting and N = 2,029,021 in a manual setting, we applied a multilevel model to estimate the impact of this cobot settings on task performance.

Findings

We show that cobot settings can reduce the time required for picking tasks by as much as 33.57%. Furthermore, practical factors such as product weight, pick density and travel distance mitigate this effect, suggesting that cobots are especially beneficial for short-distance orders.

Originality/value

Given that the literature on hybrid order picking systems has primarily applied simulation approaches, the study is among the first to provide empirical evidence from a real-world setting. The results are discussed from the perspective of Industry 5.0 and can prevent managers from making investment decisions into ineffective robotic technology.

一起,我们旅行:对零售仓储的人机协作订单拣选的实证见解
不断增加的人力成本和劳动力短缺促使零售商越来越关注他们的内部物流运作。我们研究了混合订单选择系统,其中人类和机器人共享工作时间,工作空间和目标,并保持永久联系。这需要人类和他们的机械同事(协作机器人)的合作。设计/方法/方法通过对个人层面技术适应的纵向案例研究,我们对一辆工业卡车进行了试点测试,该卡车可以自动跟随拣货员的行驶方向。基于现场实证研究和一个独特的大规模数据集,包括N = 2,086,260次存储位置访问,其中N = 57,239次存储位置访问是在混合设置中进行的,N = 2,029,021次是在手动设置中进行的,我们应用多层模型来估计这种协作机器人设置对任务性能的影响。我们发现,协作机器人设置可以减少挑选任务所需的时间,最多可减少33.57%。此外,产品重量、拣选密度和运输距离等实际因素会减轻这种影响,这表明协作机器人对短距离订单尤其有利。原创性/价值考虑到混合订单选择系统的文献主要应用模拟方法,该研究是第一个提供来自现实世界设置的经验证据。结果从工业5.0的角度进行了讨论,可以防止管理者对无效的机器人技术进行投资决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Logistics Management (IJLM) is a scholarly publication that focuses on empirical research, with a particular emphasis on qualitative studies. The journal is committed to publishing articles that contribute original ideas to the field of logistics and supply chain management, which are presented in a clear and scientifically rigorous manner. All submissions undergo a rigorous, anonymous peer review process to ensure the quality and relevance of the research. IJLM serves as a platform for the development and examination of management theories and practices in logistics and supply chain management. The journal aims to bridge the gap between academic research and practical application, providing a forum for researchers, practitioners, and educators to share insights and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信