Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority by Peter J. Katz (review)

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Christian Lehmann
{"title":"Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority by Peter J. Katz (review)","authors":"Christian Lehmann","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2023.a913289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority</em> by Peter J. Katz <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christian Lehmann (bio) </li> </ul> Peter J. Katz. <em>Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority</em>. Edinburgh UP, 2022. Pp. vii + 248. $110.00; £85.00. ISBN 978-1-474-47620-1 (hb). <p>The opening participle in Peter Katz's new book, <em>Reading Bodies</em>, is ambiguous. Are the character bodies doing the reading? Are we reading the characters or the characters each other? Is it our own bodies that are reading? Over the course of six chapters and five novelists, Katz continually disrupts our understanding of what it means to read and who does the reading. But Katz is not interested in the meta-literary; rather he attempts to return us to the experience – and stakes – of the reading public in the nineteenth century. He traces a schism between academic writers and readers against popular authors and their general reading public, for whom literacy rates rose to 81% for men and 73% for women by 1871 (93). For the academic writer and reader (e.g. Matthew Arnold and Max Müller), reading is about power and authority; these (almost always) men get to interpret and lay claim to someone else's experience (think about Edward Casaubon's Key to All Mythologies). In contrast are the popular novelists that populate Katz's chapters. \"Reading, these novelists have suggested, can be a place to reject knowledge, and even to reject a kind of false acknowledgement that only seeks authority. When read well – with feeling, for feeling, about feeling – novels can cultivate not authority, but an ethics of care\" (188). This ethics of care is the \"Empathy\" in Katz's subtitle. <strong>[End Page 493]</strong> He claims that these novelists grounded their appeal for empathetic reading in the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century science of Associationism. At its most general, Associationism claims that our sensations are absorbed first and then turned into rational understanding in ever more complicated ways along associative pathways. Katz's specific interest is in Associationism's understanding of language, which considers \"language not as a force that shapes matter discursively, nor as a byproduct of material forces, but rather as part of a biological process in an embodied, social species\" (5). Thus, reading the words on a page changes the way we interact in social space.</p> <p>The first chapter sets the background for Katz's argument as he introduces us to the philosophical debates, the scientific and philosophical practitioners, and the cultural background to his arguments about reading and Associationism. There is a dizzying array of names, but Katz ably guides the reader through the evolving thinking through helpful subsections. Chapter 2 is a sustained close reading of Dickens-as-Boz's 1837 Sketch, \"The Hospital Patient,\" in which Katz argues that Dickens's text teaches us as readers to empathize with the patient as a person and not an abstraction: \"The Sensations one feels about a textual body equate to the sensations one could feel about a living body\" (70). In Chapter 3, Katz takes on <em>Great Expectations</em> with the central argument that Pip sees himself as a constant (only) referent, which leads him to solipsistically misread others' bodies and his own. Katz approaches the novel in its serialized form (citing the weekly parts rather than the published novel) and observes that serialization</p> <blockquote> <p>enables Dickens to plug into this practice of embodied memory […]. Rather than imagine serial as a sequence of reading time punctuated by periods of waiting, Associationism suggests a continuity of sensations and complex identities that contain not simply a past self reading, but the effects of that past self on the present self remembering.</p> (89) </blockquote> <p>In an excellent subsection, \"Serialisation and Speed\" (90–96), Katz explores the relationship between the sensation novel and the frequency, speed, and location of consuming those texts, while drawing on Alfred Austin's 1870 article, \"Our Novels: The Fast School,\" to observe the connections between reading novels and experiencing empire.</p> <p>In the next three chapters, Katz turns away from Dickens to three other authors. In his chapter on <em>The Moonstone</em>, Katz argues that Collins's 1868 novel sits at the center of a debate between mechanical...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.a913289","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority by Peter J. Katz
  • Christian Lehmann (bio)
Peter J. Katz. Reading Bodies in Victorian Fiction: Associationism, Empathy and Literary Authority. Edinburgh UP, 2022. Pp. vii + 248. $110.00; £85.00. ISBN 978-1-474-47620-1 (hb).

The opening participle in Peter Katz's new book, Reading Bodies, is ambiguous. Are the character bodies doing the reading? Are we reading the characters or the characters each other? Is it our own bodies that are reading? Over the course of six chapters and five novelists, Katz continually disrupts our understanding of what it means to read and who does the reading. But Katz is not interested in the meta-literary; rather he attempts to return us to the experience – and stakes – of the reading public in the nineteenth century. He traces a schism between academic writers and readers against popular authors and their general reading public, for whom literacy rates rose to 81% for men and 73% for women by 1871 (93). For the academic writer and reader (e.g. Matthew Arnold and Max Müller), reading is about power and authority; these (almost always) men get to interpret and lay claim to someone else's experience (think about Edward Casaubon's Key to All Mythologies). In contrast are the popular novelists that populate Katz's chapters. "Reading, these novelists have suggested, can be a place to reject knowledge, and even to reject a kind of false acknowledgement that only seeks authority. When read well – with feeling, for feeling, about feeling – novels can cultivate not authority, but an ethics of care" (188). This ethics of care is the "Empathy" in Katz's subtitle. [End Page 493] He claims that these novelists grounded their appeal for empathetic reading in the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century science of Associationism. At its most general, Associationism claims that our sensations are absorbed first and then turned into rational understanding in ever more complicated ways along associative pathways. Katz's specific interest is in Associationism's understanding of language, which considers "language not as a force that shapes matter discursively, nor as a byproduct of material forces, but rather as part of a biological process in an embodied, social species" (5). Thus, reading the words on a page changes the way we interact in social space.

The first chapter sets the background for Katz's argument as he introduces us to the philosophical debates, the scientific and philosophical practitioners, and the cultural background to his arguments about reading and Associationism. There is a dizzying array of names, but Katz ably guides the reader through the evolving thinking through helpful subsections. Chapter 2 is a sustained close reading of Dickens-as-Boz's 1837 Sketch, "The Hospital Patient," in which Katz argues that Dickens's text teaches us as readers to empathize with the patient as a person and not an abstraction: "The Sensations one feels about a textual body equate to the sensations one could feel about a living body" (70). In Chapter 3, Katz takes on Great Expectations with the central argument that Pip sees himself as a constant (only) referent, which leads him to solipsistically misread others' bodies and his own. Katz approaches the novel in its serialized form (citing the weekly parts rather than the published novel) and observes that serialization

enables Dickens to plug into this practice of embodied memory […]. Rather than imagine serial as a sequence of reading time punctuated by periods of waiting, Associationism suggests a continuity of sensations and complex identities that contain not simply a past self reading, but the effects of that past self on the present self remembering.

(89)

In an excellent subsection, "Serialisation and Speed" (90–96), Katz explores the relationship between the sensation novel and the frequency, speed, and location of consuming those texts, while drawing on Alfred Austin's 1870 article, "Our Novels: The Fast School," to observe the connections between reading novels and experiencing empire.

In the next three chapters, Katz turns away from Dickens to three other authors. In his chapter on The Moonstone, Katz argues that Collins's 1868 novel sits at the center of a debate between mechanical...

维多利亚小说中的阅读体:联想主义、共情与文学权威
这里是内容的简短摘录,而不是摘要:书评:维多利亚小说中的阅读身体:联想主义,移情和文学权威,作者:彼得·j·卡茨维多利亚小说中的阅读体:联想主义、共情与文学权威。爱丁堡UP, 2022年。第vii + 248页。110.00美元;£85.00。ISBN 978-1-474-47620-1 (hb)。彼得·卡茨(Peter Katz)的新书《阅读身体》(Reading Bodies)的开头分词模棱两可。是角色的身体在阅读吗?我们是在读角色还是在读彼此的角色?是我们自己的身体在阅读吗?在六章和五位小说家的书中,卡茨不断地颠覆我们对阅读意味着什么以及谁在阅读的理解。但卡茨对元文学不感兴趣;相反,他试图让我们回到19世纪读者的经历和利害关系。他追溯了学术作家和读者与通俗作家及其普通读者之间的分裂,到1871年,通俗作家的识字率上升到男性81%,女性73%(93)。对于学术作家和读者(如马修·阿诺德和马克斯·米勒)来说,阅读是关于权力和权威的;这些(几乎总是)男人可以解释和声称别人的经历(想想爱德华·卡苏邦的《所有神话的钥匙》)。与之形成对比的是卡茨书中出现的流行小说家。这些小说家认为,阅读可以成为一个拒绝知识的地方,甚至可以拒绝一种只寻求权威的虚假承认。如果读得好——带着感情,为了感情,关于感情——小说可以培养的不是权威,而是一种关怀的伦理”(188)。这种关怀伦理就是卡茨副标题中的“共情”。他声称,这些小说家对移情阅读的诉求是建立在18世纪和19世纪的联想主义科学基础之上的。总的来说,联想主义认为,我们的感觉首先被吸收,然后以更复杂的方式,沿着联想途径转化为理性理解。卡茨特别感兴趣的是联想主义对语言的理解,它认为“语言不是一种话语塑造物质的力量,也不是物质力量的副产品,而是体现在社会物种中的生物过程的一部分”(5)。因此,阅读页面上的文字改变了我们在社会空间中互动的方式。第一章为卡茨的论点设定了背景,他向我们介绍了哲学辩论、科学和哲学实践者,以及他关于阅读和联想主义的论点的文化背景。书中有一大堆令人眼花缭乱的名字,但卡茨通过有用的小节巧妙地引导读者了解不断发展的思维。第二章是对狄更斯-博兹1837年的小品《医院的病人》的持续细读,卡茨在书中认为,狄更斯的文字教导我们作为读者去同情病人,把病人当作一个人,而不是一个抽象概念:“一个人对文本身体的感觉等同于对一个活生生的身体的感觉”(70)。在第三章中,卡茨以“伟大的期望”为中心论点,认为皮普将自己视为一个不变的(唯一的)参照对象,这导致他以唯我论的方式误读了他人和自己的身体。卡茨以连载的形式来研究小说(引用每周的部分而不是出版的小说),并观察到连载使狄更斯能够融入这种具身记忆的实践[…]。联想主义并没有把连续的阅读时间想象成被等待打断的时间序列,而是暗示了一种感觉和复杂身份的连续性,它不仅包含过去的自我阅读,还包含过去的自我对现在的自我记忆的影响。(89)在“连印与速度”(90-96)这一出色的章节中,卡茨探讨了轰动小说与阅读这些文本的频率、速度和地点之间的关系,同时借鉴了阿尔弗雷德·奥斯汀(Alfred Austin) 1870年的文章《我们的小说:快学校》(Our novel: the Fast School)来观察阅读小说与体验帝国之间的联系。在接下来的三章中,卡茨从狄更斯转向了其他三位作家。在《月光石》一章中,卡茨认为,柯林斯1868年的这部小说处于机械……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信