Assessing language impoliteness of primary school teachers in Indonesia

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yusri Yusri, R. Mantasiah, Muhammad Anwar
{"title":"Assessing language impoliteness of primary school teachers in Indonesia","authors":"Yusri Yusri, R. Mantasiah, Muhammad Anwar","doi":"10.1108/aeds-08-2023-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study investigated the use of language impoliteness of primary school teachers in communicating with their students during the learning process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The methodology of this study used a mixed-method approach by involving 100 primary school teachers in the fifth and sixth grades. The researcher used the language politeness/impoliteness scale developed by Mantasiah <em>et al.</em> (2019) to measure teachers' language impoliteness. This scale was developed based on Brown and Levinson's theory who divided politeness maxims into six consisting of tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, appreciation maxim, agreement maxim and sympathy maxim. The levels of teachers' language impoliteness were divided into five categories (5 = always, 4 = often, 3 = sometimes, 2 = rarely, 1 = never).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The finding shows that 28% of teachers were in the sometimes category and 33% of teachers were in the rarely category. The results signify that some teachers tend to speak impolitely with the students during the learning process. They considered that it was acceptable as they did not know the negative effects caused by their impolite language. Moreover, teachers were more likely to violate sympathy, tact and agreement maxims than other maxims.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The finding of this study can be applied generally at all levels of education, ranging from primary education to higher education, as a base to develop a program to improve the soft skills of teachers especially the way teachers communicate with their students in the learning process. By understanding language politeness theory, the awareness of teachers in communicating in the learning process can be improved, which can affect positively to the quality of learning process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Numerous studies conducted on communication skills of teachers focused on using communication sciences approach. This study tried to use another approach to portray the communication skills of teachers based on language politeness uttered using linguistics approach. Moreover, previous studies preferred to conduct language politeness and impoliteness of teachers in senior high schools and lecturers in university, and there is still lack of studies focusing on language politeness of primary school teachers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44145,"journal":{"name":"Asian Education and Development Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Education and Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-08-2023-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the use of language impoliteness of primary school teachers in communicating with their students during the learning process.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology of this study used a mixed-method approach by involving 100 primary school teachers in the fifth and sixth grades. The researcher used the language politeness/impoliteness scale developed by Mantasiah et al. (2019) to measure teachers' language impoliteness. This scale was developed based on Brown and Levinson's theory who divided politeness maxims into six consisting of tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, appreciation maxim, agreement maxim and sympathy maxim. The levels of teachers' language impoliteness were divided into five categories (5 = always, 4 = often, 3 = sometimes, 2 = rarely, 1 = never).

Findings

The finding shows that 28% of teachers were in the sometimes category and 33% of teachers were in the rarely category. The results signify that some teachers tend to speak impolitely with the students during the learning process. They considered that it was acceptable as they did not know the negative effects caused by their impolite language. Moreover, teachers were more likely to violate sympathy, tact and agreement maxims than other maxims.

Practical implications

The finding of this study can be applied generally at all levels of education, ranging from primary education to higher education, as a base to develop a program to improve the soft skills of teachers especially the way teachers communicate with their students in the learning process. By understanding language politeness theory, the awareness of teachers in communicating in the learning process can be improved, which can affect positively to the quality of learning process.

Originality/value

Numerous studies conducted on communication skills of teachers focused on using communication sciences approach. This study tried to use another approach to portray the communication skills of teachers based on language politeness uttered using linguistics approach. Moreover, previous studies preferred to conduct language politeness and impoliteness of teachers in senior high schools and lecturers in university, and there is still lack of studies focusing on language politeness of primary school teachers.

印尼小学教师语言不礼貌的评估
目的本研究调查小学教师在学生学习过程中与学生交流时的语言不礼貌行为。设计/方法/方法本研究的方法采用混合方法,涉及100名小学五年级和六年级的教师。研究者使用Mantasiah et al.(2019)开发的语言礼貌/不礼貌量表来测量教师的语言不礼貌。该量表是在Brown和Levinson的理论基础上开发的,Brown和Levinson将礼貌准则分为圆滑准则、慷慨准则、认可准则、欣赏准则、同意准则和同情准则六种。教师的语言不礼貌程度分为5类(5 =经常,4 =经常,3 =有时,2 =很少,1 =从不)。调查结果调查结果显示,28%的教师属于“有时”类别,33%的教师属于“很少”类别。结果表明,在学习过程中,一些教师倾向于对学生说话不礼貌。他们认为这是可以接受的,因为他们不知道他们的不礼貌的语言所造成的负面影响。此外,教师更有可能违反同情、机智和一致准则,而不是其他准则。实践意义本研究结果可广泛应用于从初等教育到高等教育的各级教育,作为制定教师软技能,特别是教师在学习过程中与学生沟通方式的改进方案的基础。通过理解语言礼貌理论,可以提高教师在学习过程中的交际意识,从而对学习过程的质量产生积极的影响。许多关于教师沟通技巧的研究都侧重于运用沟通科学的方法。本研究试图用语言学的方法,从语言礼貌的角度来描述教师的交际技巧。此外,以往的研究更倾向于对高中教师和大学讲师的语言礼貌和不礼貌进行研究,对小学教师语言礼貌的研究还比较缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Education and Development Studies
Asian Education and Development Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Asian Education and Development Studies (AEDS) is a new journal showcasing the latest research on education, development and governance issues in Asian contexts. AEDS fosters cross-boundary research with the aim of enhancing our socio-scientific understanding of Asia. AEDS invites original empirical research, review papers and comparative analyses as well as reports and research notes around education, political science, sociology and development studies. Articles with strong comparative perspectives and regional insights will be especially welcome. In-depth examinations of the role of education in the promotion of social, economic, cultural and political development in Asia are also encouraged. AEDS is the official journal of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association. Key topics for submissions: Educational development in Asia, Globalization and regional responses from Asia, Social development and social policy in Asia, Urbanization and social change in Asia, Politics and changing governance in Asia, Critical development issues and policy implications in Asia, Demographic change and changing social structure in Asia. Key subject areas for research submissions: Education, Political Science, Sociology , Development Studies .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信