Are Fatwas Dispensable? Examining the Contemporary Relevance and Authority of Fatwas in Australia

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Shaheen Whyte
{"title":"Are Fatwas Dispensable? Examining the Contemporary Relevance and Authority of Fatwas in Australia","authors":"Shaheen Whyte","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwac015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fatwas play a central role in the articulation and contextualization of Islamic law. Despite its lofty status within Islam’s juristic tradition, the authoritative value and function of fatwas in contemporary Muslim societies is undergoing significant change. Whereas historical fatwas generated immense solidarity within Islam’s legal schools and traditional ulama (religious scholars), Muslims today are confronted with an unprecedented supply of fatwas from various religious actors, institutions and digital platforms vying to speak for Islam. Using Australia as a case study, this article investigates the role, demand, and relevance of fatwas in Australia. It draws on empirical fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2019 with Muslim religious actors including imams/sheikhs, educators, academics and members of the Australian Muslim community. The findings show Australian Muslims are largely sceptical about the relevance and credibility behind fatwa-making in Australia. Among the findings, participants demand greater scholarly expertise, legal analysis, and institutional output in the production of fatwas. Participants additionally expressed desire to establish locally based fatwa councils with the ability to produce context-specific fatwas for Australian Muslims.","PeriodicalId":44058,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fatwas play a central role in the articulation and contextualization of Islamic law. Despite its lofty status within Islam’s juristic tradition, the authoritative value and function of fatwas in contemporary Muslim societies is undergoing significant change. Whereas historical fatwas generated immense solidarity within Islam’s legal schools and traditional ulama (religious scholars), Muslims today are confronted with an unprecedented supply of fatwas from various religious actors, institutions and digital platforms vying to speak for Islam. Using Australia as a case study, this article investigates the role, demand, and relevance of fatwas in Australia. It draws on empirical fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2019 with Muslim religious actors including imams/sheikhs, educators, academics and members of the Australian Muslim community. The findings show Australian Muslims are largely sceptical about the relevance and credibility behind fatwa-making in Australia. Among the findings, participants demand greater scholarly expertise, legal analysis, and institutional output in the production of fatwas. Participants additionally expressed desire to establish locally based fatwa councils with the ability to produce context-specific fatwas for Australian Muslims.
伊斯兰教法可有可无吗?审视澳大利亚法特瓦的当代相关性和权威
法特瓦在伊斯兰法律的表述和语境化中发挥着核心作用。尽管在伊斯兰教的法律传统中地位崇高,但在当代穆斯林社会中,法特瓦的权威价值和功能正在发生重大变化。尽管历史上的伊斯兰教法令在伊斯兰法律学校和传统的乌拉玛(宗教学者)之间产生了巨大的团结,但今天的穆斯林面临着来自各种宗教行为者、机构和数字平台的前所未有的伊斯兰教法令。本文以澳大利亚为例,探讨了伊斯兰教令在澳大利亚的作用、需求和相关性。它借鉴了2018年至2019年期间与穆斯林宗教行为者(包括伊玛目/酋长、教育工作者、学者和澳大利亚穆斯林社区成员)进行的实证实地调查。调查结果显示,澳大利亚穆斯林在很大程度上对澳大利亚制定法特瓦背后的相关性和可信度持怀疑态度。在调查结果中,参与者要求更多的学术专业知识,法律分析,以及在制定法特瓦时的制度产出。与会者还表示希望建立以当地为基础的法特瓦委员会,有能力为澳大利亚穆斯林制定具体情况的法特瓦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Recent years have witnessed a resurgence of religion in public life and a concomitant array of legal responses. This has led in turn to the proliferation of research and writing on the interaction of law and religion cutting across many disciplines. The Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (OJLR) will have a range of articles drawn from various sectors of the law and religion field, including: social, legal and political issues involving the relationship between law and religion in society; comparative law perspectives on the relationship between religion and state institutions; developments regarding human and constitutional rights to freedom of religion or belief; considerations of the relationship between religious and secular legal systems; and other salient areas where law and religion interact (e.g., theology, legal and political theory, legal history, philosophy, etc.). The OJLR reflects the widening scope of study concerning law and religion not only by publishing leading pieces of legal scholarship but also by complementing them with the work of historians, theologians and social scientists that is germane to a better understanding of the issues of central concern. We aim to redefine the interdependence of law, humanities, and social sciences within the widening parameters of the study of law and religion, whilst seeking to make the distinctive area of law and religion more comprehensible from both a legal and a religious perspective. We plan to capture systematically and consistently the complex dynamics of law and religion from different legal as well as religious research perspectives worldwide. The OJLR seeks leading contributions from various subdomains in the field and plans to become a world-leading journal that will help shape, build and strengthen the field as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信