Partial de-annuitization of public pensions vs. retirement age differentiation: Which is best to account for longevity differences?

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Vincent Vandenberghe
{"title":"Partial de-annuitization of public pensions vs. retirement age differentiation: Which is best to account for longevity differences?","authors":"Vincent Vandenberghe","doi":"10.1017/s1474747222000257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive research by demographers and economists has shown that longevity differs across socio-economic status (SES), with low-educated or low-income people living, on average, shorter lives than their better-endowed and wealthier peers. Therefore, a pension system with a unique retirement age is a priori problematic. The usual policy recommendation to address this problem is to differentiate the retirement age by SES. This paper explores the relative merits of partial de-annuitization of public pensions as a way of addressing the (imperfectly assessed) inequality of longevity.","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747222000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research by demographers and economists has shown that longevity differs across socio-economic status (SES), with low-educated or low-income people living, on average, shorter lives than their better-endowed and wealthier peers. Therefore, a pension system with a unique retirement age is a priori problematic. The usual policy recommendation to address this problem is to differentiate the retirement age by SES. This paper explores the relative merits of partial de-annuitization of public pensions as a way of addressing the (imperfectly assessed) inequality of longevity.
公共养老金的部分去年化vs.退休年龄差异:哪一个最能解释寿命差异?
人口统计学家和经济学家的广泛研究表明,不同社会经济地位(SES)的人的寿命不同,受教育程度低或收入低的人的平均寿命比条件更好、更富有的同龄人短。因此,单独规定退休年龄的养老金制度存在先天问题。解决这一问题的通常政策建议是按社会经济地位区分退休年龄。本文探讨了公共养老金部分去年化作为解决(不完全评估的)寿命不平等的一种方式的相对优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信