Why are individuals unwilling to report corruption? An inquiry into perception-based definitions of corruption and employment-related factors

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Felippe Clemente, Luís de Sousa, Raquel Rego, Patrícia Calca
{"title":"Why are individuals unwilling to report corruption? An inquiry into perception-based definitions of corruption and employment-related factors","authors":"Felippe Clemente,&nbsp;Luís de Sousa,&nbsp;Raquel Rego,&nbsp;Patrícia Calca","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Despite the increasing interest and investment in whistle-blowing regulations, policies, and mechanisms, people are still hesitant to report corruption. The existing literature explaining what deters people from reporting serious wrongdoing predominantly concentrates on either organisational factors or personal motivations. Only a limited number of studies integrate objective and subjective individual-level constraints on whistle-blowing. Using original survey data from Portugal, this article investigates two sets of individual-level factors that explain the reluctance to report corruption: employment-related characteristics (objective constraints) and perception-based definitions of corruption (subjective constraints). A regression analysis of the survey data reveals that individuals working in the private sector are less inclined to report corruption compared to public officials. This finding underscores the significance of job security in influencing people's willingness to report corruption. The results also indicate that individuals with a minimalist definition of corruption, perceiving it solely as a legal offence, are more hesitant to report corruption. This finding supports the notion that whistle-blowing policies should not be limited to reporting blatant legal violations instead of any suspected wrongdoing of corporate or public significance. Our study emphasises the need for whistle-blowing policies to not only establish secure and visible mechanisms for reporting serious wrongdoing within organisations, but also to raise awareness of how social norms and job security can impact individuals’ decisions to report such occurrences. This article contributes to whistle-blowing and governance research by shedding light on how perception-based definitions and judgements of corruption, as well as employment-related factors, can influence individuals’ willingness or unwillingness to report corruption.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Job precariousness and limited understanding of corruption are two key factors that limit individuals’ willingness to report corruption.</li>\n \n <li>Policies and measures aimed at improving work conditions and ethical climate within organisations may be more effective in encouraging whistle-blowing than solely improving formal reporting mechanisms.</li>\n \n <li>Further research is needed to explore individual-level factors for reporting corruption in different types of organisations and sectors, along with more specific information about whistle-blowing policies and mechanisms.</li>\n \n <li>Implementing effective whistle-blowing policies and mechanisms requires not only adopting laws but also creating the institutional conditions and motivating individuals to report corruption, which may require commitment and contextual knowledge from top leadership.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"83 4","pages":"625-646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest and investment in whistle-blowing regulations, policies, and mechanisms, people are still hesitant to report corruption. The existing literature explaining what deters people from reporting serious wrongdoing predominantly concentrates on either organisational factors or personal motivations. Only a limited number of studies integrate objective and subjective individual-level constraints on whistle-blowing. Using original survey data from Portugal, this article investigates two sets of individual-level factors that explain the reluctance to report corruption: employment-related characteristics (objective constraints) and perception-based definitions of corruption (subjective constraints). A regression analysis of the survey data reveals that individuals working in the private sector are less inclined to report corruption compared to public officials. This finding underscores the significance of job security in influencing people's willingness to report corruption. The results also indicate that individuals with a minimalist definition of corruption, perceiving it solely as a legal offence, are more hesitant to report corruption. This finding supports the notion that whistle-blowing policies should not be limited to reporting blatant legal violations instead of any suspected wrongdoing of corporate or public significance. Our study emphasises the need for whistle-blowing policies to not only establish secure and visible mechanisms for reporting serious wrongdoing within organisations, but also to raise awareness of how social norms and job security can impact individuals’ decisions to report such occurrences. This article contributes to whistle-blowing and governance research by shedding light on how perception-based definitions and judgements of corruption, as well as employment-related factors, can influence individuals’ willingness or unwillingness to report corruption.

Points for practitioners

  • Job precariousness and limited understanding of corruption are two key factors that limit individuals’ willingness to report corruption.
  • Policies and measures aimed at improving work conditions and ethical climate within organisations may be more effective in encouraging whistle-blowing than solely improving formal reporting mechanisms.
  • Further research is needed to explore individual-level factors for reporting corruption in different types of organisations and sectors, along with more specific information about whistle-blowing policies and mechanisms.
  • Implementing effective whistle-blowing policies and mechanisms requires not only adopting laws but also creating the institutional conditions and motivating individuals to report corruption, which may require commitment and contextual knowledge from top leadership.
为什么个人不愿意举报腐败?调查基于感知的腐败定义和与就业有关的因素
尽管人们对举报法规、政策和机制的兴趣和投入越来越大,但人们对举报腐败仍然犹豫不决。现有的文献解释了是什么阻止人们报告严重的不法行为,主要集中在组织因素或个人动机上。只有有限数量的研究整合了客观和主观的个人层面对举报的约束。本文使用来自葡萄牙的原始调查数据,调查了两组解释不愿举报腐败的个人层面因素:与就业相关的特征(客观约束)和基于感知的腐败定义(主观约束)。对调查数据的回归分析显示,与公职人员相比,在私营部门工作的个人不太倾向于举报腐败。这一发现强调了工作保障在影响人们举报腐败意愿方面的重要性。研究结果还表明,对腐败的定义极简的人,只把腐败视为一种法律犯罪,在举报腐败方面更犹豫不决。这一发现支持了这样一种观点,即举报政策不应局限于报告公然的违法行为,而不应局限于报告任何对公司或公众有重大意义的可疑不法行为。我们的研究强调,有必要制定举报政策,不仅要建立安全、可见的机制来举报组织内的严重不法行为,还要提高人们对社会规范和工作保障如何影响个人举报此类事件的决定的认识。本文通过揭示基于感知的腐败定义和判断以及与就业相关的因素如何影响个人举报腐败的意愿或不意愿,为举报和治理研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信