Weinstein's Scandal: Contrastive Study on Intensification in American and Spanish Opinion Columns

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Communication Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.1177/01968599221086227

Conchi Hernández-Guerra

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to make a qualitative analysis of the intensifiers used in the Spanish and American opinion columns. The topic chosen has been Weinstein's scandal and the publications during next weeks by different sources. The method followed will be Albelda Marco (2014) in which she divides intensifiers into lexical, semantical and expressions. Euphemisms will also be considered due to the relationship it has in the corpus with intensification. Conclusions try to explain the uneven number of examples in both nations and the reasons.

查看原文本刊更多论文

温斯坦丑闻:美国和西班牙评论栏目的强化对比研究

本文的目的是对西班牙语和美国评论专栏中使用的强化语进行定性分析。选择的主题是韦恩斯坦的丑闻，以及未来几周不同来源的出版物。接下来的方法是Albelda Marco(2014)，她将强化语分为词汇、语义和表达。由于委婉语在语料库中与强化的关系，也将考虑委婉语。结论试图解释两国的例子数量不均及其原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Communication Inquiry COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Communication Inquiry emphasizes interdisciplinary inquiry into communication and mass communication phenomena within cultural and historical perspectives. Such perspectives imply that an understanding of these phenomena cannot arise soley out of a narrowly focused analysis. Rather, the approaches emphasize philosophical, evaluative, empirical, legal, historical, and/or critical inquiry into relationships between mass communication and society across time and culture. The Journal of Communication Inquiry is a forum for such investigations.