On the Effectiveness of Scaffolding Strategies and Task orientation on Receptive and Productive Knowledge of Lexical Collocations

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Azam Naserpour,Abbas Ali Zarei
{"title":"On the Effectiveness of Scaffolding Strategies and Task orientation on Receptive and Productive Knowledge of Lexical Collocations","authors":"Azam Naserpour,Abbas Ali Zarei","doi":"10.26817/16925777.1130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed at investigating the effects of scaffolding strategies using input and output-oriented tasks on Iranian EFL learners' receptive and productive knowledge of lexical collocations. For this purpose, 540 adult intermediate-level EFL learners- both male and female- were selected and divided into six experimental groups; three input-oriented and three output-oriented tasks. Each experimental group received treatment under one of the three scaffolding strategies of direct corrective feedback, cooperative group technique, and visual cues. After the treatment period, a 40-item multiple-choice test and a 40-item fill-in-the-blanks test were administered to assess the participants' receptive and productive collocations knowledge. To analyze the data, two separate two-way ANOVA procedures were used. The results indicated that visual cues were the most effective scaffolding strategy in teaching lexical collocations. Moreover, the cooperative group technique had a significant positive impact on learning collocations compared to direct corrective feedback. The results also showed that the participants in the output-oriented tasks group significantly outperformed those in the input-oriented tasks group. These findings can have practical implications for language learners, teachers, and materials developers, and theoretical implications for researchers.","PeriodicalId":42765,"journal":{"name":"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"107-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating the effects of scaffolding strategies using input and output-oriented tasks on Iranian EFL learners' receptive and productive knowledge of lexical collocations. For this purpose, 540 adult intermediate-level EFL learners- both male and female- were selected and divided into six experimental groups; three input-oriented and three output-oriented tasks. Each experimental group received treatment under one of the three scaffolding strategies of direct corrective feedback, cooperative group technique, and visual cues. After the treatment period, a 40-item multiple-choice test and a 40-item fill-in-the-blanks test were administered to assess the participants' receptive and productive collocations knowledge. To analyze the data, two separate two-way ANOVA procedures were used. The results indicated that visual cues were the most effective scaffolding strategy in teaching lexical collocations. Moreover, the cooperative group technique had a significant positive impact on learning collocations compared to direct corrective feedback. The results also showed that the participants in the output-oriented tasks group significantly outperformed those in the input-oriented tasks group. These findings can have practical implications for language learners, teachers, and materials developers, and theoretical implications for researchers.
论脚手架策略和任务导向对词汇搭配的接受性和生产性知识的影响
本研究旨在探讨输入导向任务和输出导向任务的脚手架策略对伊朗英语学习者词汇搭配的接受性和生产性知识的影响。为此,研究人员选择了540名成年中级英语学习者,包括男性和女性,并将其分为六个实验组;三个面向输入和三个面向输出的任务。每个实验组采用直接纠正反馈、合作小组技术和视觉提示三种支架策略中的一种进行治疗。治疗期结束后,进行40项选择题测试和40项填空测试,以评估参与者的接受性和生产性搭配知识。为了分析数据,使用了两个单独的双向方差分析程序。结果表明,视觉线索是词汇搭配教学中最有效的脚手架策略。此外,与直接纠正反馈相比,合作小组技术对学习搭配有显著的正向影响。结果还显示,输出导向型任务组的参与者表现明显优于输入导向型任务组的参与者。这些发现对语言学习者、教师和材料开发者具有实际意义,对研究人员具有理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal
GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信