Shevchenko, Pavel V., Murakami, Daisuke, Matsui, Tomoko, Myrvoll, Tor A.
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 type events on the economy and climate under the stochastic DICE model","authors":"Shevchenko, Pavel V., Murakami, Daisuke, Matsui, Tomoko, Myrvoll, Tor A.","doi":"10.1007/s10018-021-00332-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The classical DICE model is a widely accepted integrated assessment model for the joint modeling of economic and climate systems, where all model state variables evolve over time deterministically. We reformulate and solve the DICE model as an optimal control dynamic programming problem with six state variables (related to the carbon concentration, temperature, and economic capital) evolving over time deterministically and affected by two controls (carbon emission mitigation rate and consumption). We then extend the model by adding a discrete stochastic shock variable to model the economy in the stressed and normal regimes as a jump process caused by events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. These shocks reduce the world gross output leading to a reduction in both the world net output and carbon emission. The extended model is solved under several scenarios as an optimal stochastic control problem, assuming that the shock events occur randomly on average once every 100 years and last for 5 years. The results show that, if the world gross output recovers in full after each event, the impact of the COVID-19 events on the temperature and carbon concentration will be immaterial even in the case of a conservative 10% drop in the annual gross output over a 5-year period. The impact becomes noticeable, although still extremely small (long-term temperature drops by <span>\\(0.1^\\circ \\mathrm {C}\\)</span>), in a presence of persistent shocks of a 5% output drop propagating to the subsequent time periods through the recursively reduced productivity. If the deterministic DICE model policy is applied in a presence of stochastic shocks (i.e., when this policy is suboptimal), then the drop in temperature is larger (approximately <span>\\(0.25^\\circ \\mathrm {C}\\)</span>), that is, the lower economic activities owing to shocks imply that more ambitious mitigation targets are now feasible at lower costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46150,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-021-00332-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The classical DICE model is a widely accepted integrated assessment model for the joint modeling of economic and climate systems, where all model state variables evolve over time deterministically. We reformulate and solve the DICE model as an optimal control dynamic programming problem with six state variables (related to the carbon concentration, temperature, and economic capital) evolving over time deterministically and affected by two controls (carbon emission mitigation rate and consumption). We then extend the model by adding a discrete stochastic shock variable to model the economy in the stressed and normal regimes as a jump process caused by events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. These shocks reduce the world gross output leading to a reduction in both the world net output and carbon emission. The extended model is solved under several scenarios as an optimal stochastic control problem, assuming that the shock events occur randomly on average once every 100 years and last for 5 years. The results show that, if the world gross output recovers in full after each event, the impact of the COVID-19 events on the temperature and carbon concentration will be immaterial even in the case of a conservative 10% drop in the annual gross output over a 5-year period. The impact becomes noticeable, although still extremely small (long-term temperature drops by \(0.1^\circ \mathrm {C}\)), in a presence of persistent shocks of a 5% output drop propagating to the subsequent time periods through the recursively reduced productivity. If the deterministic DICE model policy is applied in a presence of stochastic shocks (i.e., when this policy is suboptimal), then the drop in temperature is larger (approximately \(0.25^\circ \mathrm {C}\)), that is, the lower economic activities owing to shocks imply that more ambitious mitigation targets are now feasible at lower costs.
经典的DICE模型是一种被广泛接受的用于经济和气候系统联合建模的综合评估模型,其中所有模式状态变量都随时间确定性地演变。我们将DICE模型重新表述并求解为一个最优控制动态规划问题,该问题具有六个状态变量(与碳浓度、温度和经济资本相关)随时间确定性地演变,并受到两个控制因素(碳排放减缓率和消耗)的影响。然后,我们通过添加离散随机冲击变量来扩展模型,将压力和正常状态下的经济建模为由事件(如COVID-19大流行)引起的跳跃过程。这些冲击减少了世界总产出,导致世界净产出和碳排放双双减少。扩展模型作为最优随机控制问题在几种情况下求解,假设冲击事件平均每100年随机发生一次,持续5年。结果表明,如果每次事件后世界总产出都完全恢复,即使在保守的10情况下,COVID-19事件对温度和碳浓度的影响也将是微不足道的% drop in the annual gross output over a 5-year period. The impact becomes noticeable, although still extremely small (long-term temperature drops by \(0.1^\circ \mathrm {C}\)), in a presence of persistent shocks of a 5% output drop propagating to the subsequent time periods through the recursively reduced productivity. If the deterministic DICE model policy is applied in a presence of stochastic shocks (i.e., when this policy is suboptimal), then the drop in temperature is larger (approximately \(0.25^\circ \mathrm {C}\)), that is, the lower economic activities owing to shocks imply that more ambitious mitigation targets are now feasible at lower costs.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and the official journal of the Asian Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, it provides an international forum for debates among diverse disciplines such as environmental economics, environmental policy studies, and related fields. The main purpose of the journal is twofold: to encourage (1) integration of theoretical studies and policy studies on environmental issues and (2) interdisciplinary works of environmental economics, environmental policy studies, and related fields on environmental issues. The journal also welcomes contributions from any discipline as long as they are consistent with the above stated aims and purposes, and encourages interaction beyond the traditional schools of thought.