{"title":"Vedāntadeśika’s Systematization of Rāmānuja’s Self-surrender (prapatti): A Study Based on the Nikṣeparakṣā","authors":"Manasicha Akepiyapornchai","doi":"10.1007/s11407-022-09312-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the Śrīvaiṣṇava validation of the doctrine of self-surrender to the Supreme God Viṣṇu (<i>prapatti</i>). <i>Prapatti</i> is mentioned by Rāmānuja (traditional dates: circa 1017–1137 CE), the most authoritative teacher (<i>ācārya</i>) of the tradition, as an auxiliary to the path of devotion (<i>bhaktiyoga</i>) that he teaches as a means to <i>mokṣa</i>. After the time of Rāmānuja, <i>prapatti</i> was developed as an alternative means. However, the post-Rāmānuja teachers were committed to arguing that Rāmānuja teaches <i>prapatti</i> as an independent means. The article focuses on Vedāntadeśika (traditional dates: circa 1268–1369 CE), the most influential post-Rāmānuja teacher, and his interpretation of Rāmānuja’s <i>prapatti</i> as a teaching of soteriological <i>prapatti</i> in Vedāntadeśika’s under-researched <i>Nikṣeparakṣā</i>. Vedāntadeśika’s interpretation reflects his harmonization of Rāmānuja’s ambivalent statements regarding <i>prapatti</i> and synthetization of traditional authorities. This study thus contributes to the understanding of Vedāntadeśika’s <i>Nikṣeparakṣā</i> and its development of the doctrine of <i>prapatti</i> and to his critical role in systematizing this doctrine.</p>","PeriodicalId":53989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hindu Studies","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hindu Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-022-09312-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article examines the Śrīvaiṣṇava validation of the doctrine of self-surrender to the Supreme God Viṣṇu (prapatti). Prapatti is mentioned by Rāmānuja (traditional dates: circa 1017–1137 CE), the most authoritative teacher (ācārya) of the tradition, as an auxiliary to the path of devotion (bhaktiyoga) that he teaches as a means to mokṣa. After the time of Rāmānuja, prapatti was developed as an alternative means. However, the post-Rāmānuja teachers were committed to arguing that Rāmānuja teaches prapatti as an independent means. The article focuses on Vedāntadeśika (traditional dates: circa 1268–1369 CE), the most influential post-Rāmānuja teacher, and his interpretation of Rāmānuja’s prapatti as a teaching of soteriological prapatti in Vedāntadeśika’s under-researched Nikṣeparakṣā. Vedāntadeśika’s interpretation reflects his harmonization of Rāmānuja’s ambivalent statements regarding prapatti and synthetization of traditional authorities. This study thus contributes to the understanding of Vedāntadeśika’s Nikṣeparakṣā and its development of the doctrine of prapatti and to his critical role in systematizing this doctrine.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1997, the International Journal of Hindu Studies is committed to publishing excellent scholarship on well-established topics in Hindu Studies, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating alternative perspectives as well as exchange of information on a wide range of issues. The Journal supports critical inquiry, hermeneutical interpretive proposals, and historical investigation into all aspects of Hindu traditions. While committed to publishing articles that will advance scholarship in any discipline relevant to Hindu Studies, the Journal is especially interested in areas of research that have cross-disciplinary relevance or new implications for this emerging field of scholarly interest. Submissions of a comparative or theoretical nature in every discipline in the humanities and social sciences will receive serious and respectful consideration. Each submission to the Journal will receive double-blind review.