Karl Voglmeier, Voltaire Velazco, Luca Egli, Julian Gröbner, Alberto Redondas, Wolfgang Steinbrecht
{"title":"The transition to new ozone absorption cross-sections for Dobson and Brewer total ozone measurements","authors":"Karl Voglmeier, Voltaire Velazco, Luca Egli, Julian Gröbner, Alberto Redondas, Wolfgang Steinbrecht","doi":"10.5194/amt-2023-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Comparison of total ozone column (TOC) measurements from ground-based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and from various satellite instruments generally reveals seasonally varying differences of a few percent. A large part of these differences has been attributed to the operationally used Bass & Paur ozone cross-sections and the lack of accounting for varying stratospheric temperatures in the standard total ozone retrieval for Dobson. This paper demonstrates how the use of new ozone absorption cross sections from the University of Bremen (Weber et al., 2016), as recommended by the committee on Absorption Cross-Sections of Ozone, the application of appropriate slit functions, especially for the Dobson instrument (Bernhard et al. 2005), and the use of climatological values for the effective ozone layer temperature (T<sub>eff</sub>), e.g. from TEMIS, essentially eliminate these seasonally varying differences between Dobson and Brewer total ozone data. Applying this approach to the existing global network of Dobson spectrometers will reduce the uncertainty of their total ozone data, from previously 3 to 4 % to better than 2.0 % at most locations.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"176 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Comparison of total ozone column (TOC) measurements from ground-based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and from various satellite instruments generally reveals seasonally varying differences of a few percent. A large part of these differences has been attributed to the operationally used Bass & Paur ozone cross-sections and the lack of accounting for varying stratospheric temperatures in the standard total ozone retrieval for Dobson. This paper demonstrates how the use of new ozone absorption cross sections from the University of Bremen (Weber et al., 2016), as recommended by the committee on Absorption Cross-Sections of Ozone, the application of appropriate slit functions, especially for the Dobson instrument (Bernhard et al. 2005), and the use of climatological values for the effective ozone layer temperature (Teff), e.g. from TEMIS, essentially eliminate these seasonally varying differences between Dobson and Brewer total ozone data. Applying this approach to the existing global network of Dobson spectrometers will reduce the uncertainty of their total ozone data, from previously 3 to 4 % to better than 2.0 % at most locations.
摘要。将地面多布森和布鲁尔分光光度计和各种卫星仪器测量的总臭氧柱(TOC)进行比较,通常会显示出几个百分点的季节性差异。这些差异的很大一部分归因于操作上使用的Bass &在Dobson的标准总臭氧检索中,臭氧横截面和缺乏对平流层温度变化的考虑。本文演示了如何根据臭氧吸收截面委员会的建议,使用不来梅大学的新臭氧吸收截面(Weber et al., 2016),适当的狭缝函数的应用,特别是对于Dobson仪器(Bernhard et al. 2005),以及使用有效臭氧层温度(Teff)的气候学值,例如来自TEMIS,基本上消除了多布森和布鲁尔臭氧总量数据之间的季节性差异。将这种方法应用到现有的全球多布森光谱仪网络中,将减少它们的总臭氧数据的不确定性,从以前的3%到4%降低到大多数地点的2.0%以上。
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere.
The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.