Kristopher A. Hendershot, Maya N. Elias, Breana L. Taylor, Sarah Wahlster, Claire J. Creutzfeldt
{"title":"An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal-Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty","authors":"Kristopher A. Hendershot, Maya N. Elias, Breana L. Taylor, Sarah Wahlster, Claire J. Creutzfeldt","doi":"10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of review</h3><p>We investigate the complexities and interplay between the concepts of prognostic uncertainty and patient preferences as they relate to the delivery of goal-concordant care to patients with severe acute brain injuries (SABI) in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent findings</h3><p>Patients with SABI in the Neuro-ICU have unique palliative care needs due to sudden, often unexpected changes in personhood and quality of life. A substantial amount of uncertainty is inherent and poses a challenge to both the patient’s prognosis and treatment preferences. The delivery of goal-concordant care can be difficult to achieve.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>The uncertainty inherent to both prognosis and patient preferences challenges the provision of goal-concordant care to patients with SABI. The best case/worst case/most likely case scenario is a communication strategy that can aid clinicians when discussing the patient’s uncertain prognosis. A time-limited trial may provide a framework for families and clinicians to pursue aggressive life-sustaining treatment for a certain amount of time, in which prognosis may become more defined, patient goals may become clearer, and clinicians and families may establish a common ground. Although the delivery of goal-concordant care in the Neuro-ICU may be an unachievable, lofty goal, it is a level of care that we should continue to strive for and discuss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10975,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review
We investigate the complexities and interplay between the concepts of prognostic uncertainty and patient preferences as they relate to the delivery of goal-concordant care to patients with severe acute brain injuries (SABI) in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU).
Recent findings
Patients with SABI in the Neuro-ICU have unique palliative care needs due to sudden, often unexpected changes in personhood and quality of life. A substantial amount of uncertainty is inherent and poses a challenge to both the patient’s prognosis and treatment preferences. The delivery of goal-concordant care can be difficult to achieve.
Summary
The uncertainty inherent to both prognosis and patient preferences challenges the provision of goal-concordant care to patients with SABI. The best case/worst case/most likely case scenario is a communication strategy that can aid clinicians when discussing the patient’s uncertain prognosis. A time-limited trial may provide a framework for families and clinicians to pursue aggressive life-sustaining treatment for a certain amount of time, in which prognosis may become more defined, patient goals may become clearer, and clinicians and families may establish a common ground. Although the delivery of goal-concordant care in the Neuro-ICU may be an unachievable, lofty goal, it is a level of care that we should continue to strive for and discuss.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of neurology. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to the treatment of neurologic conditions.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as epilepsy, headache, neurologic ophthalmology and otology, neuromuscular disorders, psychiatric manifestations of neurologic disease, and sleep disorders. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known neurologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.