You Are Wrong Because I Am Right! The Perceived Causes and Ideological Biases of Misinformation Beliefs

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Michael Hameleers,Anna Brosius
{"title":"You Are Wrong Because I Am Right! The Perceived Causes and Ideological Biases of Misinformation Beliefs","authors":"Michael Hameleers,Anna Brosius","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edab028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the context of increasing concerns about false and deceptive information in public opinion, this research note explores which causes and sources news users associate with the dissemination of misinformation. Based on representative survey data collected in the Netherlands (N = 1,994), we found that news users distinguish unintentional causes related to uncertain evidence and lacking expert knowledge from politically or financially motivated falsehoods. People on the left-wing of the political spectrum associate falsehoods more with the radical-right, whereas those on the right-wing tend to associate misinformation with the radical-left. Right-wing participants, however, are most likely to perceive misinformation as driven by a deliberate attempt to hide reality. Our findings point to an ideological bias in information credibility that could foster polarization along epistemic lines.","PeriodicalId":51480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the context of increasing concerns about false and deceptive information in public opinion, this research note explores which causes and sources news users associate with the dissemination of misinformation. Based on representative survey data collected in the Netherlands (N = 1,994), we found that news users distinguish unintentional causes related to uncertain evidence and lacking expert knowledge from politically or financially motivated falsehoods. People on the left-wing of the political spectrum associate falsehoods more with the radical-right, whereas those on the right-wing tend to associate misinformation with the radical-left. Right-wing participants, however, are most likely to perceive misinformation as driven by a deliberate attempt to hide reality. Our findings point to an ideological bias in information credibility that could foster polarization along epistemic lines.
你错了,因为我是对的!错误信息信念的感知原因与意识形态偏见
在公众舆论中对虚假和欺骗性信息日益关注的背景下,本研究报告探讨了新闻用户与虚假信息传播相关的原因和来源。根据在荷兰收集的代表性调查数据(N = 1994),我们发现新闻用户将与不确定证据和缺乏专业知识相关的无意原因与政治或经济动机的谎言区分开来。政治光谱中的左翼人士更多地将谎言与激进右翼联系在一起,而右翼人士则倾向于将错误信息与激进左翼联系在一起。然而,右翼参与者最有可能将错误信息视为蓄意掩盖事实的行为。我们的研究结果指出,信息可信度中的意识形态偏见可能会助长认知线上的两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Opinion Research welcomes manuscripts that describe: - studies of public opinion that contribute to theory development and testing about political, social and current issues, particularly those that involve comparative analysis; - the role of public opinion polls in political decision making, the development of public policies, electoral behavior, and mass communications; - evaluations of and improvements in the methodology of public opinion surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信