Animal abuse recidivism: a narrative review

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Olivia Reid, Emma Alleyne
{"title":"Animal abuse recidivism: a narrative review","authors":"Olivia Reid, Emma Alleyne","doi":"10.1108/jfp-07-2023-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to consolidate and evaluate the available research on animal abuse recidivism.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A narrative review of the animal abuse literature was conducted. Articles were included if they provided data/estimates of the rates of recidivism, findings regarding the static, dynamic and/or protective factors associated with animal abuse recidivism and available risk assessment tools, specifically for use with individuals who have a history of animal abuse.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The literature review highlighted high rates of reoffending amongst those who have harmed animals. Many risk and protective factors associated with animal abuse were common to the wider offending behaviour literature (e.g. antisocial attitudes, relationship issues), but more robust research is needed to highlight any distinct characteristics. Lastly, the review reports two risk assessment tools designed specifically for this offending group.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Clinicians and criminal justice personnel base their sentencing, detention and treatment decisions, at least in part, on the recidivism literature. This review provides a consolidation of the evidence base as an aide memoire for practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>History of animal abuse is a risk factor for future animal harm specifically, and interpersonal violence more broadly. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review that presents the key research evidence on risk/protective factors and relevant risk assessment tools that can inform intervention planning to reduce risk of reoffending towards animals and humans alike when practitioners encounter clients who have a history of harming animals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-07-2023-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to consolidate and evaluate the available research on animal abuse recidivism.

Design/methodology/approach

A narrative review of the animal abuse literature was conducted. Articles were included if they provided data/estimates of the rates of recidivism, findings regarding the static, dynamic and/or protective factors associated with animal abuse recidivism and available risk assessment tools, specifically for use with individuals who have a history of animal abuse.

Findings

The literature review highlighted high rates of reoffending amongst those who have harmed animals. Many risk and protective factors associated with animal abuse were common to the wider offending behaviour literature (e.g. antisocial attitudes, relationship issues), but more robust research is needed to highlight any distinct characteristics. Lastly, the review reports two risk assessment tools designed specifically for this offending group.

Practical implications

Clinicians and criminal justice personnel base their sentencing, detention and treatment decisions, at least in part, on the recidivism literature. This review provides a consolidation of the evidence base as an aide memoire for practitioners.

Originality/value

History of animal abuse is a risk factor for future animal harm specifically, and interpersonal violence more broadly. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review that presents the key research evidence on risk/protective factors and relevant risk assessment tools that can inform intervention planning to reduce risk of reoffending towards animals and humans alike when practitioners encounter clients who have a history of harming animals.

动物虐待累犯:叙述性回顾
目的对虐待动物累犯的现有研究进行整理和评价。设计/方法/方法对虐待动物的文献进行了叙述性回顾。如果文章提供了累犯率的数据/估计,关于与动物虐待累犯相关的静态、动态和/或保护因素的发现,以及可用的风险评估工具,特别是用于有动物虐待史的个人,则将其纳入。研究发现:文献综述强调了那些伤害动物的人再犯的比例很高。与动物虐待相关的许多风险和保护因素在更广泛的犯罪行为文献中是共同的(例如反社会态度,关系问题),但需要更有力的研究来突出任何独特的特征。最后,综述报告了专门为这一犯罪群体设计的两种风险评估工具。临床医生和刑事司法人员的量刑、拘留和治疗决定,至少部分是基于累犯文献。这篇综述提供了证据基础的巩固,作为从业者的辅助备忘录。原创性/价值虐待动物的历史是未来动物伤害的风险因素,更广泛地说,是人际暴力的风险因素。据作者所知,这是第一次文献综述,提出了风险/保护因素和相关风险评估工具的关键研究证据,可以为干预计划提供信息,以降低从业者遇到有伤害动物历史的客户时再次侵犯动物和人类的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信