{"title":"Invisible Audiences: The Pathos of Vision in Charles Altieri's Late Poetics","authors":"Daniel T. O'Hara","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a913437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Invisible Audiences<span>The Pathos of Vision in Charles Altieri's Late Poetics</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Daniel T. O'Hara (bio) </li> </ul> <p><em>Literature, Education, and Society: Bridging the Gap</em> (2023) is the latest book by Charles Altieri. Altieri is the author of many important books that combine critical theory, modernist poetry, and often modern painting. Of these books, I think his very best are <em>Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning</em> (1981), <em>Painterly Abstraction in Modernist American Poetry: The Contemporaneity of Modernism</em> (1989), and <em>The Particulars of Rapture: An Aesthetics of the Affects</em> (2003). What ties his books together is his overarching thesis that European phenomenology and Anglo-American philosophy, working together, can illuminate the continuing contemporaneity of modernism and what once upon a time was called postmodernism. That is, modernity's most characteristic arts of poetry and painting, from the Renaissance to the present moment, continue to dominate the imagination of the age, whatever name it carries. The subtitle of this new book, \"Bridging the Gap,\" pretty much explains Altieri's approach throughout his career.</p> <p>I admire this approach, and have been pursuing it from the beginning of my own career when I first met Altieri at a \"Defining Modernism\" session of the MLA in the mid-1970s. These session spanned a number of years and were primarily proposed and moderated by William V. Spanos, a founding editor of <em>boundary 2</em>, a journal devoted to distinguishing postmodernism as Spanos understood it from modernism, a big issue at the time, even before Lyotard's work on postmodernism made its way into the American context. On this session's panel, Marjorie Perloff was speaking about William Carlos Williams's \"This Is Just to Say.\" I noticed that Charlie, as those who knew him called him, was scribbling furiously, as Perloff spoke, as he sat next to her on the panel. A few years later, his counter-reading of the poem appeared in print, demonstrating literally the idea of critical conversation. For me, Charlie has always been a leader in the furthering of that conversation. So, too, this new book proposes a poetics that indeed seeks to bridge the gaps, <strong>[End Page 169]</strong> some would now say the abysses, separating the institution of literature and literary study, higher education, and American society, despite the overlaps among them.</p> <p>A hallmark of Altieri's poetics, throughout his career, has been Wallace Stevens's \"Of Modern Poetry\" (1942), and halfway into this short book it shows up again. Before discussing his use of the poem here, his reading of it, I want to highlight a portion of this famous poetry about poetry manifesto for my own purposes. Stevens argues at the heart of the poem that modern poetry, to be such, must construct a new stage, as the old one in the theater of the mind has been displaced, even as the old script of the world must be revised, written anew, on the new stage, within the new theater:</p> <blockquote> <p><span>And, like an insatiable actor, slowly and</span><span>With meditation, speak the words that in the ear,</span><span>In the delicatest ear of the mind, repeat,</span><span>Exactly, that which it wants to hear, at the sound</span><span>Of which, an invisible audience listens,</span><span>Not to the play, but to itself, expressed</span><span>In an emotion as of two people, as of two</span><span>Emotions becoming one. The actor is</span><span>A metaphysician in the dark, twanging</span><span>An instrument, twanging a wiry string that gives</span><span>Sounds passing through sudden rightnesses, wholly</span><span>Containing the mind, below which it cannot descend,</span><span>Beyond which it has not will to rise.</span></p> </blockquote> <p>Stevens says \"metaphysician,\" but if we adopt his lines to Altieri's work here and over his career, we can substitute \"theorist,\" especially if we understand how Altieri hones Heidegger and Wittgenstein quotations to his purposes in this latest poetics, as well as more generally. The intentionality is the same as Stevens's, the becoming one thing of the gaping divisions of the mind: \"It must / Be the finding of a satisfaction, and may / Be of a man skating, a woman dancing, a woman / Combing. The poem of the act of the mind.\" For Altieri, modernism, postmodernism, poetry, literature at large, painting, and all imaginative poetics share this central...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a913437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Invisible AudiencesThe Pathos of Vision in Charles Altieri's Late Poetics
Daniel T. O'Hara (bio)
Literature, Education, and Society: Bridging the Gap (2023) is the latest book by Charles Altieri. Altieri is the author of many important books that combine critical theory, modernist poetry, and often modern painting. Of these books, I think his very best are Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning (1981), Painterly Abstraction in Modernist American Poetry: The Contemporaneity of Modernism (1989), and The Particulars of Rapture: An Aesthetics of the Affects (2003). What ties his books together is his overarching thesis that European phenomenology and Anglo-American philosophy, working together, can illuminate the continuing contemporaneity of modernism and what once upon a time was called postmodernism. That is, modernity's most characteristic arts of poetry and painting, from the Renaissance to the present moment, continue to dominate the imagination of the age, whatever name it carries. The subtitle of this new book, "Bridging the Gap," pretty much explains Altieri's approach throughout his career.
I admire this approach, and have been pursuing it from the beginning of my own career when I first met Altieri at a "Defining Modernism" session of the MLA in the mid-1970s. These session spanned a number of years and were primarily proposed and moderated by William V. Spanos, a founding editor of boundary 2, a journal devoted to distinguishing postmodernism as Spanos understood it from modernism, a big issue at the time, even before Lyotard's work on postmodernism made its way into the American context. On this session's panel, Marjorie Perloff was speaking about William Carlos Williams's "This Is Just to Say." I noticed that Charlie, as those who knew him called him, was scribbling furiously, as Perloff spoke, as he sat next to her on the panel. A few years later, his counter-reading of the poem appeared in print, demonstrating literally the idea of critical conversation. For me, Charlie has always been a leader in the furthering of that conversation. So, too, this new book proposes a poetics that indeed seeks to bridge the gaps, [End Page 169] some would now say the abysses, separating the institution of literature and literary study, higher education, and American society, despite the overlaps among them.
A hallmark of Altieri's poetics, throughout his career, has been Wallace Stevens's "Of Modern Poetry" (1942), and halfway into this short book it shows up again. Before discussing his use of the poem here, his reading of it, I want to highlight a portion of this famous poetry about poetry manifesto for my own purposes. Stevens argues at the heart of the poem that modern poetry, to be such, must construct a new stage, as the old one in the theater of the mind has been displaced, even as the old script of the world must be revised, written anew, on the new stage, within the new theater:
And, like an insatiable actor, slowly andWith meditation, speak the words that in the ear,In the delicatest ear of the mind, repeat,Exactly, that which it wants to hear, at the soundOf which, an invisible audience listens,Not to the play, but to itself, expressedIn an emotion as of two people, as of twoEmotions becoming one. The actor isA metaphysician in the dark, twangingAn instrument, twanging a wiry string that givesSounds passing through sudden rightnesses, whollyContaining the mind, below which it cannot descend,Beyond which it has not will to rise.
Stevens says "metaphysician," but if we adopt his lines to Altieri's work here and over his career, we can substitute "theorist," especially if we understand how Altieri hones Heidegger and Wittgenstein quotations to his purposes in this latest poetics, as well as more generally. The intentionality is the same as Stevens's, the becoming one thing of the gaping divisions of the mind: "It must / Be the finding of a satisfaction, and may / Be of a man skating, a woman dancing, a woman / Combing. The poem of the act of the mind." For Altieri, modernism, postmodernism, poetry, literature at large, painting, and all imaginative poetics share this central...
这里是内容的简短摘录,而不是摘要:看不见的观众查尔斯·阿尔蒂耶里晚期诗学中的视觉悲情丹尼尔·t·奥哈拉(传记)文学,教育和社会:弥合差距(2023)是查尔斯·阿尔蒂耶里的最新著作。阿尔蒂耶里是许多结合了批判理论、现代主义诗歌和现代绘画的重要著作的作者。在这些书中,我认为他最好的是《行为与品质:文学意义理论》(1981)、《现代主义美国诗歌中的绘画抽象:现代主义的当代性》(1989)和《狂喜的细节:情感美学》(2003)。将他的书联系在一起的是他的主要论点,即欧洲现象学和英美哲学,一起工作,可以阐明现代主义和曾经被称为后现代主义的持续当代性。也就是说,从文艺复兴时期到现在,现代最具特色的诗歌和绘画艺术,无论它带着什么名字,都继续主导着这个时代的想象。这本新书的副标题“弥合差距”(Bridging The Gap)很好地解释了阿尔蒂耶里在整个职业生涯中的做法。我很欣赏这种方法,从我自己的职业生涯开始,当我在20世纪70年代中期的MLA“定义现代主义”会议上第一次见到Altieri时,我就一直在追求它。这些会议持续了数年,主要由威廉·v·斯帕诺斯(William V. Spanos)提出并主持,他是《边界2》(boundary 2)的创始编辑,该杂志致力于区分斯帕诺斯所理解的后现代主义与现代主义,这在当时是一个大问题,甚至在利奥塔德的后现代主义作品进入美国之前。在这次的小组讨论中,Marjorie Perloff谈到了William Carlos Williams的《this Is Just to Say》。我注意到查理——那些认识他的人都这么叫他——在佩尔洛夫说话的时候,正在疯狂地乱写乱画。佩尔洛夫坐在她旁边。几年后,他对这首诗的反读出现在印刷品上,从字面上证明了批判性对话的想法。对我来说,查理一直是推动这种对话的领导者。因此,这本新书也提出了一种诗学,它确实试图弥合差距,有些人现在称之为深渊,将文学机构和文学研究,高等教育和美国社会分开,尽管它们之间存在重叠。在阿尔提耶里的整个诗学生涯中,华莱士·史蒂文斯(Wallace Stevens)的《现代诗歌》(of Modern Poetry, 1942)一直是他诗学的一个标志,在这本短小的书中,它又出现了。在讨论他对这首诗的使用,他对它的解读之前,我想强调一下这首著名的关于诗歌宣言的诗的一部分。史蒂文斯在这首诗的核心提出,现代诗歌要想成为这样的诗歌,就必须构建一个新的舞台,因为思想舞台上的旧舞台已经被取代,就像世界的旧剧本必须被修改,在新的舞台上,在新的舞台上,重新书写一样:然后,像一个贪得无厌的演员,慢慢地,沉思着,在耳朵里,在心灵最灵敏的耳朵里,重复着它想要听到的话语,在这种声音中,一个看不见的观众,不是在听剧本,而是在听它自己,表达着一种情感,就像两个人的情感,两种情感合二为一。演员是一个形而上的学者,在黑暗中摇着弦。一种乐器,摇着弦,发出声音,通过突然的权利,完全包含了思想,它不能下降到下面,也没有意愿上升到上面。史蒂文斯说的是“形而上学家”,但如果我们在这里和他的职业生涯中采用他对阿尔铁里的作品的描述,我们可以用“理论家”来代替,特别是如果我们理解阿尔铁里是如何在这本最新的诗学中引用海德格尔和维特根斯坦的语录来达到他的目的,以及更广泛的目的。他的意向性与史蒂文斯的相同,是心灵的巨大分裂的一件事:“它必须/是对一种满足的发现,也可能/是一个滑冰的男人,一个跳舞的女人,一个梳头的女人。”心灵行为的诗。”对阿尔蒂耶里来说,现代主义、后现代主义、诗歌、文学、绘画和所有富有想象力的诗学都有这个中心……