Finalists by Rae Armantrout (review)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Thomas C. Marshall
{"title":"Finalists by Rae Armantrout (review)","authors":"Thomas C. Marshall","doi":"10.1353/abr.2023.a913428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Finalists</em> by Rae Armantrout <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Thomas C. Marshall (bio) </li> </ul> <em><small>finalists</small></em><br/> Rae Armantrout<br/> Wesleyan University Press<br/> https://www.weslpress.org/9780819580672/finalists/<br/> 176 pages; Print, $16.95 <p><em>Finalists</em> is, as we usually like a book of poetry to be, a treasury of small pleasures. The prevailing trends have taught us to expect little insights and clever wording. This book, however, uses those expectations in order to critique them. They are not just met here, but made part of how the book attacks the usual. Rae Armantrout's works have all along been twists on poetry's ways, incorporating the expected while offering new perspectives on expectations themselves.</p> <p>From \"Compound\" in <em>Crawl Out Your Window 11</em> (1983) to \"Crescendo,\" prominently placed in the October 18, 2021, <em>New Yorker</em>, Armantrout's short lyrics have kept up a throbbing basso continuo of tension within perceptions of the world and our ways of putting them into language or finding them there. Those two poems, embracing forty years of an expanding career that has brought her a Pulitzer and other honors, have in them the momentary perceptions we expect as insight from the best poets along with an undertow of penetrating social critique. Armantrout's analyses are subtle, hidden in an approach that looks at things and ways of putting things—and at the world that encompasses both of those—with the same ever-so-slight snarkiness that Dickinson used in \"Some Keep the Sabbath.\" One might call these poems <strong>[End Page 125]</strong> \"ana-lyrical,\" as they engage both analytical critical thinking and lyrical musicality in their wording. \"Crescendo\" and \"Circles\" are two of the many clear examples of this approach in <em>Finalists</em>.</p> <p>There are many dozens of other fine, enjoyably intelligent poems in the book. They often play one kind of diction against another. \"Hang On\" opens the volume with an \"unlikely eye\" and what it notices: like an empty shopping cart / parked on a ledge / above a freeway.\" The poem moves from this social-symptom image to contemplation of the beauties of a barnacle. \"Ceremonial\" juxtaposes some chemistry of poisons with a critique of communion. \"My Place\" examines emotion as if \"from a call center perspective.\" But the one the <em>New Yorker</em> put right in the middle of their article on Paul McCartney's premiere party for Peter Jackson's <em>Let It Be</em> (2021) film presents the complexity of Armantrout's analysis right where it is born—in \"languaging.\" They show how something gets put into words and what the words have to do with how we see that thing. A little close reading can unfold this process in those two two-part poems for us, and show us how to sense it throughout <em>Finalists</em>.</p> <p>The two parts of \"Crescendo\" are called \"The Light 1\" and \"The Light 2.\" Both parts seem to look at the same striking light on some garden shrubs, part 2 perhaps benefiting from the more detailed portrayal of it in part 1. Part 1 turns from this perceptive portrait of late-afternoon light toward the emotion of missing something or someone. \"I'll miss you,\" it says, \"so much when you're gone\"—a phrase worthy of a Hallmark poem, but then the \"you\" seems to refer to the view of the ornamental pear and mock orange in the light of a moment. \"I'd miss you if I looked away / or if a cloud covered the sun\" suggests the ephemerality of the pleasure subject to the light and its way of changing things. And following that, the poem declares \"I miss this moment / as it goes on happening,\" and so it takes us to a larger philosophical or phenomenological framework of how we \"miss\" in a couple of ways all that is in the moment. That is certainly a whole poem right there, the kind we have been led over the years to expect: image, insight, and further perception—all within the \"unlikely eye\" and mind of the disciplined poet, laid out simply so that there is little doubt we \"get it.\"</p> <p>And then comes \"The Light 2.\" Maybe it's the next page in the poet's notebook, the next take or attempt to not miss...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2023.a913428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Finalists by Rae Armantrout
  • Thomas C. Marshall (bio)
finalists
Rae Armantrout
Wesleyan University Press
https://www.weslpress.org/9780819580672/finalists/
176 pages; Print, $16.95

Finalists is, as we usually like a book of poetry to be, a treasury of small pleasures. The prevailing trends have taught us to expect little insights and clever wording. This book, however, uses those expectations in order to critique them. They are not just met here, but made part of how the book attacks the usual. Rae Armantrout's works have all along been twists on poetry's ways, incorporating the expected while offering new perspectives on expectations themselves.

From "Compound" in Crawl Out Your Window 11 (1983) to "Crescendo," prominently placed in the October 18, 2021, New Yorker, Armantrout's short lyrics have kept up a throbbing basso continuo of tension within perceptions of the world and our ways of putting them into language or finding them there. Those two poems, embracing forty years of an expanding career that has brought her a Pulitzer and other honors, have in them the momentary perceptions we expect as insight from the best poets along with an undertow of penetrating social critique. Armantrout's analyses are subtle, hidden in an approach that looks at things and ways of putting things—and at the world that encompasses both of those—with the same ever-so-slight snarkiness that Dickinson used in "Some Keep the Sabbath." One might call these poems [End Page 125] "ana-lyrical," as they engage both analytical critical thinking and lyrical musicality in their wording. "Crescendo" and "Circles" are two of the many clear examples of this approach in Finalists.

There are many dozens of other fine, enjoyably intelligent poems in the book. They often play one kind of diction against another. "Hang On" opens the volume with an "unlikely eye" and what it notices: like an empty shopping cart / parked on a ledge / above a freeway." The poem moves from this social-symptom image to contemplation of the beauties of a barnacle. "Ceremonial" juxtaposes some chemistry of poisons with a critique of communion. "My Place" examines emotion as if "from a call center perspective." But the one the New Yorker put right in the middle of their article on Paul McCartney's premiere party for Peter Jackson's Let It Be (2021) film presents the complexity of Armantrout's analysis right where it is born—in "languaging." They show how something gets put into words and what the words have to do with how we see that thing. A little close reading can unfold this process in those two two-part poems for us, and show us how to sense it throughout Finalists.

The two parts of "Crescendo" are called "The Light 1" and "The Light 2." Both parts seem to look at the same striking light on some garden shrubs, part 2 perhaps benefiting from the more detailed portrayal of it in part 1. Part 1 turns from this perceptive portrait of late-afternoon light toward the emotion of missing something or someone. "I'll miss you," it says, "so much when you're gone"—a phrase worthy of a Hallmark poem, but then the "you" seems to refer to the view of the ornamental pear and mock orange in the light of a moment. "I'd miss you if I looked away / or if a cloud covered the sun" suggests the ephemerality of the pleasure subject to the light and its way of changing things. And following that, the poem declares "I miss this moment / as it goes on happening," and so it takes us to a larger philosophical or phenomenological framework of how we "miss" in a couple of ways all that is in the moment. That is certainly a whole poem right there, the kind we have been led over the years to expect: image, insight, and further perception—all within the "unlikely eye" and mind of the disciplined poet, laid out simply so that there is little doubt we "get it."

And then comes "The Light 2." Maybe it's the next page in the poet's notebook, the next take or attempt to not miss...

作者:Rae Armantrout
代替摘要,这里是内容的简短摘录:评审:决赛选手由雷·阿曼特劳特托马斯·c·马歇尔(传记)决赛选手雷·阿曼特劳特卫斯理大学出版社https://www.weslpress.org/9780819580672/finalists/ 176页;就像我们通常喜欢的那样,《决赛》是一本充满小快乐的诗集。主流趋势告诉我们,不要指望什么洞见和聪明的措辞。然而,这本书用这些期望来批判它们。这些问题不仅在这里得到了满足,而且成为了这本书攻击常规的一部分。雷·阿曼特劳特的作品一直是对诗歌方式的扭曲,在融入预期的同时,为预期本身提供了新的视角。从1983年《爬出你的窗户11》(Crawl Out Your Window 11)中的“复合”(Compound),到2021年10月18日《纽约客》(New Yorker)上的显著位置上的“渐强”(Crescendo),阿曼特罗的短歌词一直保持着一种跳动的低音持续,表达着对世界的感知以及我们将它们表达为语言或在那里找到它们的方式。这两首诗涵盖了她40年来不断扩大的职业生涯,为她带来了普利策奖和其他荣誉,其中包含了我们所期望的最优秀诗人的洞察力,以及穿透性的社会批判的潜流。阿曼特劳特的分析是微妙的,隐藏在一种看待事物和放置事物的方式——以及包含这两者的世界——的方法中,用狄金森在《有些人守安息日》中所使用的同样非常轻微的讽刺。有人可能会称这些诗为“反抒情”,因为它们在措辞上兼具分析性批判性思维和抒情音乐性。“渐强”和“圆圈”是决赛中使用这种方法的两个明显例子。这本书中还有许多其他优秀的、令人愉快的智慧诗歌。他们经常用一种措辞对抗另一种措辞。“Hang On”以一种“不太可能的眼光”打开了这本书,它注意到:就像一个空的购物车/停在一个窗台上/在高速公路上。这首诗从这个社会症状的形象转移到对藤壶之美的沉思。《仪式》将一些毒药的化学反应与对共融的批判并列。《我的地方》仿佛“从呼叫中心的角度”审视情感。但是,《纽约客》在一篇关于保罗·麦卡特尼为彼得·杰克逊的电影《顺其自然》(Let It Be, 2021)举办的首映式派对的文章中,把这句话放在中间,展示了阿曼特劳特分析的复杂性,这正是它诞生于“语言”的地方。它们展示了事物是如何用语言表达的,以及这些语言与我们看待事物的方式有什么关系。细读一下这两首两部分的诗,就能让我们了解这一过程,并向我们展示如何在决赛中感受到这一过程。“渐强”的两部分分别被称为“光1”和“光2”。两部分似乎都看到了花园灌木上同样引人注目的光线,第二部分可能受益于第一部分中更详细的描述。第一部分从这幅对傍晚光线的敏锐描绘转向思念某物或某人的情感。“我会想念你的,”上面写着,“当你离开的时候,我会非常想念你。”——这句话配得上贺曼公司(Hallmark)的一首诗,但“你”似乎指的是在某一刻的光线下观赏梨花和仿橘子的景色。“如果我把目光移开/或者如果一片云遮住了太阳,我会想念你的”暗示了受光和它改变事物的方式影响的快乐的短暂性。接着,这首诗宣称“我怀念这一刻/因为它正在发生”,所以它把我们带到一个更大的哲学或现象学框架,关于我们如何以各种方式“怀念”这一刻的一切。这当然是一首完整的诗,是我们多年来一直期待的那种:形象、洞察力和进一步的感知——所有这些都在纪律严明的诗人“不太可能的眼睛”和头脑中,简单地安排好了,所以我们毫无疑问会“理解它”。然后是《光明2》。也许这是诗人笔记本上的下一页,下一次尝试或尝试不要错过……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信