A tangled web: global review of fishing interactions with rhino rays

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
J. M. Pytka, P. M. Kyne, J. K. Carlson, N. Wosnick, R. W. Jabado
{"title":"A tangled web: global review of fishing interactions with rhino rays","authors":"J. M. Pytka, P. M. Kyne, J. K. Carlson, N. Wosnick, R. W. Jabado","doi":"10.1007/s11160-023-09821-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rhino rays (Order Rhinopristiformes) are one of the most threatened vertebrate groups. Despite overfishing being recognised as the greatest threat to this group, a comprehensive assessment of the fisheries and types of fishing gear that rhino rays interact with is lacking. We reviewed published and grey literature (<i>n</i> = 116 references) to evaluate interactions between rhino rays and fisheries, determine gear types most responsible for their capture, and species for which most interactions occur by region. Interactions (<i>n</i> = 420) were reported from 37 of 88 range states, for 52 of 68 known species. Combined, 59% of the literature reported interactions from trawlers and gillnets. Wedgefishes (Rhinidae) were the most reported family (29%) and bowmouth guitarfish (<i>Rhina ancylostomus</i>) the most reported species (9.5%). Asia accounted for half of interactions (<i>n</i> = 211), with 67% of the literature from unspecified gear (e.g., mixed landings), masking gear-specific interactions. Data quality was variable, with the highest resolution in countries with lower species diversity and where species are least imperiled (e.g., Australia). Discard mortality and physiological effects of capture are poorly known with data available for 25% of species (almost exclusively from Australia and the Americas). While additional data are urgently required to quantify the true extent of rhino ray catch globally, reducing fisheries mortality is a priority and key to address declining populations. Recommendations include prioritizing spatial management in critical habitats (e.g., nursery areas), expansion in the use of proven bycatch reduction devices, encouraging safe release and handling, and addressing drivers of retention and trade.</p>","PeriodicalId":21181,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-023-09821-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rhino rays (Order Rhinopristiformes) are one of the most threatened vertebrate groups. Despite overfishing being recognised as the greatest threat to this group, a comprehensive assessment of the fisheries and types of fishing gear that rhino rays interact with is lacking. We reviewed published and grey literature (n = 116 references) to evaluate interactions between rhino rays and fisheries, determine gear types most responsible for their capture, and species for which most interactions occur by region. Interactions (n = 420) were reported from 37 of 88 range states, for 52 of 68 known species. Combined, 59% of the literature reported interactions from trawlers and gillnets. Wedgefishes (Rhinidae) were the most reported family (29%) and bowmouth guitarfish (Rhina ancylostomus) the most reported species (9.5%). Asia accounted for half of interactions (n = 211), with 67% of the literature from unspecified gear (e.g., mixed landings), masking gear-specific interactions. Data quality was variable, with the highest resolution in countries with lower species diversity and where species are least imperiled (e.g., Australia). Discard mortality and physiological effects of capture are poorly known with data available for 25% of species (almost exclusively from Australia and the Americas). While additional data are urgently required to quantify the true extent of rhino ray catch globally, reducing fisheries mortality is a priority and key to address declining populations. Recommendations include prioritizing spatial management in critical habitats (e.g., nursery areas), expansion in the use of proven bycatch reduction devices, encouraging safe release and handling, and addressing drivers of retention and trade.

Abstract Image

一个纠结的网:全球渔业与犀牛鳐相互作用的回顾
犀牛鳐(犀牛目)是最受威胁的脊椎动物之一。尽管过度捕捞被认为是对这一群体的最大威胁,但对犀牛鳐接触的渔业和渔具类型的全面评估仍然缺乏。我们回顾了已发表的文献和灰色文献(n = 116篇参考文献),以评估犀牛射线与渔业之间的相互作用,确定对犀牛射线捕获最负责的渔具类型,以及按地区发生大多数相互作用的物种。88个州中有37个州报告了相互作用(n = 420), 68个已知物种中有52个。总共有59%的文献报道了拖网渔船和刺网之间的相互作用。报告最多的科是楔鱼(Rhinidae)(29%),报告最多的种是弓嘴吉他鱼(Rhina ancylostomus)(9.5%)。亚洲占一半的相互作用(n = 211), 67%的文献来自未指定的齿轮(例如,混合着陆),掩盖了齿轮特定的相互作用。数据质量是可变的,在物种多样性较低和物种受危害最小的国家(如澳大利亚),分辨率最高。丢弃的死亡率和捕获的生理影响尚不清楚,只有25%的物种(几乎全部来自澳大利亚和美洲)的数据。虽然迫切需要更多的数据来量化全球犀牛射线捕捞的真实程度,但降低渔业死亡率是解决人口下降问题的优先事项和关键。建议包括优先考虑关键栖息地(如苗圃区)的空间管理,扩大使用经过验证的减少副渔获物装置,鼓励安全释放和处理,以及解决留存和贸易的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The subject matter is focused on include evolutionary biology, zoogeography, taxonomy, including biochemical taxonomy and stock identification, genetics and genetic manipulation, physiology, functional morphology, behaviour, ecology, fisheries assessment, development, exploitation and conservation. however, reviews will be published from any field of fish biology where the emphasis is placed on adaptation, function or exploitation in the whole organism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信