A Comparison of the Changes in Gestational Weight, Body Mass Index, and Serum Vitamin D Level in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients Complemented with Vitamin D in Contrast to Those Who Did Not Receive the Supplement: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Sumanta Saha, Sujata Saha
{"title":"A Comparison of the Changes in Gestational Weight, Body Mass Index, and Serum Vitamin D Level in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients Complemented with Vitamin D in Contrast to Those Who Did Not Receive the Supplement: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials","authors":"Sumanta Saha, Sujata Saha","doi":"10.1159/000505269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b><i>Aims:</i></b> To date, it is largely unknown how body mass index (BMI), gestational weight (GW), and stored vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels change in the vitamin D-supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients, irrespective of their pre-pregnancy BMI. Therefore, to study this association, a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is proposed here. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Primarily, different databases (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) will be searched (without any limitation to date or language) for randomised parallel-arm trials comparing GW, BMI and stored vitamin D level in the body among GDM patients who were supplemented and not supplemented with vitamin D, besides their conventional GDM care. The study selection process and the consecutive risk of bias assessment will adhere to the PRISMA 2009 flow chart and the Cochrane collaboration’s guideline, respectively. These interventions’ effect on the respective outcomes will be compared by meta-analysis (along with an assessment of the statistical heterogeneity) when comparable data will be available from at least 4 studies. Subgroup analysis and Egger’s meta-regression will follow if an adequate number of trials are available. Narrative reporting will be considered when a quantitative comparison is not feasible for any of the outcomes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The proposed review aims to compare the BMI, GW, and 25(OH)D levels in the blood between the vitamin D supplemented and not supplemented GDM patients.<br />Int J Diabetes Metab","PeriodicalId":501148,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000505269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To date, it is largely unknown how body mass index (BMI), gestational weight (GW), and stored vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels change in the vitamin D-supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients, irrespective of their pre-pregnancy BMI. Therefore, to study this association, a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is proposed here. Methods: Primarily, different databases (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) will be searched (without any limitation to date or language) for randomised parallel-arm trials comparing GW, BMI and stored vitamin D level in the body among GDM patients who were supplemented and not supplemented with vitamin D, besides their conventional GDM care. The study selection process and the consecutive risk of bias assessment will adhere to the PRISMA 2009 flow chart and the Cochrane collaboration’s guideline, respectively. These interventions’ effect on the respective outcomes will be compared by meta-analysis (along with an assessment of the statistical heterogeneity) when comparable data will be available from at least 4 studies. Subgroup analysis and Egger’s meta-regression will follow if an adequate number of trials are available. Narrative reporting will be considered when a quantitative comparison is not feasible for any of the outcomes. Conclusion: The proposed review aims to compare the BMI, GW, and 25(OH)D levels in the blood between the vitamin D supplemented and not supplemented GDM patients.
Int J Diabetes Metab
补充维生素D与未补充维生素D的妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠体重、体重指数和血清维生素D水平变化的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
目的:迄今为止,对于补充维生素D的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者的身体质量指数(BMI)、妊娠体重(GW)和储存的维生素D (25(OH)D)水平的变化,无论其孕前BMI如何,在很大程度上是未知的。因此,为了研究这种关联,本文提出了一项前瞻性系统评价和荟萃分析方案。方法:首先,将检索不同的数据库(PubMed, Embase和Scopus)(不受日期或语言的限制),以进行随机平行试验,比较补充和未补充维生素D的GDM患者的GW, BMI和体内储存的维生素D水平,除了常规的GDM护理。研究选择过程和连续的偏倚风险评估将分别遵循PRISMA 2009流程图和Cochrane合作指南。当从至少4项研究中获得可比数据时,将通过荟萃分析(以及统计异质性评估)比较这些干预措施对各自结果的影响。如果有足够数量的试验,将进行亚组分析和Egger元回归。当定量比较对任何结果都不可行时,叙述性报告将被考虑。结论:本综述旨在比较补充和未补充维生素D的GDM患者血液中BMI、GW和25(OH)D水平。[J]糖尿病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信