Callum Gray, Lekshmi Kailas, Peter G. Adams, Christopher D. P. Duffy
{"title":"Unravelling the fluorescence kinetics of light-harvesting proteins with simulated measurements","authors":"Callum Gray, Lekshmi Kailas, Peter G. Adams, Christopher D. P. Duffy","doi":"arxiv-2307.14043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The plant light-harvesting pigment-protein complex LHCII is the major antenna\nsub-unit of PSII and is generally (though not universally) accepted to play a\nrole in photoprotective energy dissipation under high light conditions, a\nprocess known Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ). The underlying mechanisms of\nenergy trapping and dissipation within LHCII are still debated. Various\nproposed models differ considerably in their molecular and kinetic detail, but\nare often based on different interpretations of very similar transient\nabsorption measurements of isolated complexes. Here we present a simulated\nmeasurement of the fluorescence decay kinetics of quenched LHCII aggregates to\ndetermine whether this relatively simple measurement can discriminate between\ndifferent potential NPQ mechanisms. We simulate not just the underlying physics\n(excitation, energy migration, quenching and singlet-singlet annihilation) but\nalso the signal detection and typical experimental data analysis. Comparing\nthis to a selection of published fluorescence decay kinetics we find that: (1)\nDifferent proposed quenching mechanisms produce noticeably different\nfluorescence kinetics even at low (annihilation free) excitation density,\nthough the degree of difference is dependent on pulse width. (2) Measured decay\nkinetics are consistent with most LHCII trimers becoming relatively slow\nexcitation quenchers. A small sub-population of very fast quenchers produces\nkinetics which do not resemble any observed measurement. (3) It is necessary to\nconsider at least two distinct quenching mechanisms in order to accurately\nreproduce experimental kinetics, supporting the idea that NPQ is not a simple\nbinary switch switch.","PeriodicalId":501170,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Subcellular Processes","volume":"58 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Subcellular Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2307.14043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The plant light-harvesting pigment-protein complex LHCII is the major antenna
sub-unit of PSII and is generally (though not universally) accepted to play a
role in photoprotective energy dissipation under high light conditions, a
process known Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ). The underlying mechanisms of
energy trapping and dissipation within LHCII are still debated. Various
proposed models differ considerably in their molecular and kinetic detail, but
are often based on different interpretations of very similar transient
absorption measurements of isolated complexes. Here we present a simulated
measurement of the fluorescence decay kinetics of quenched LHCII aggregates to
determine whether this relatively simple measurement can discriminate between
different potential NPQ mechanisms. We simulate not just the underlying physics
(excitation, energy migration, quenching and singlet-singlet annihilation) but
also the signal detection and typical experimental data analysis. Comparing
this to a selection of published fluorescence decay kinetics we find that: (1)
Different proposed quenching mechanisms produce noticeably different
fluorescence kinetics even at low (annihilation free) excitation density,
though the degree of difference is dependent on pulse width. (2) Measured decay
kinetics are consistent with most LHCII trimers becoming relatively slow
excitation quenchers. A small sub-population of very fast quenchers produces
kinetics which do not resemble any observed measurement. (3) It is necessary to
consider at least two distinct quenching mechanisms in order to accurately
reproduce experimental kinetics, supporting the idea that NPQ is not a simple
binary switch switch.