Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol

Stacey Watts, Yogesh Apte, Thomas Holland, April Hatt, Alison Craswell, Frances Lin, Alexis Tabah, Robert S Ware, Joshua Byrnes, Christopher Anstey, Gerben Keijzers, Mahesh Ramanan
{"title":"Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol","authors":"Stacey Watts, Yogesh Apte, Thomas Holland, April Hatt, Alison Craswell, Frances Lin, Alexis Tabah, Robert S Ware, Joshua Byrnes, Christopher Anstey, Gerben Keijzers, Mahesh Ramanan","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.21.23298856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> When clinicians need to administer a vasopressor infusion, they are faced with the choice of administration via either peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) or central venous catheter (CVC). Vasopressor infusions have traditionally been administered via central venous catheters (CVC) rather than Peripheral Intra Venous Catheters (PIVC), primarily due to concerns of extravasation and resultant tissue injury. This practice is not guided by contemporary RCT evidence. Observational data suggests safety of vasopressor infusion via PIVC. To address this evidence gap, we have designed the “Vasopressors Infused via Peripheral or Central Access” (VIPCA) randomised controlled trial (RCT).","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.21.23298856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background When clinicians need to administer a vasopressor infusion, they are faced with the choice of administration via either peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) or central venous catheter (CVC). Vasopressor infusions have traditionally been administered via central venous catheters (CVC) rather than Peripheral Intra Venous Catheters (PIVC), primarily due to concerns of extravasation and resultant tissue injury. This practice is not guided by contemporary RCT evidence. Observational data suggests safety of vasopressor infusion via PIVC. To address this evidence gap, we have designed the “Vasopressors Infused via Peripheral or Central Access” (VIPCA) randomised controlled trial (RCT).
一项随机、对照、可行性试验,比较危重成人通过外周导管和中心静脉导管输注血管加压素:一项研究方案
背景:当临床医生需要给药血管加压剂输注时,他们面临着通过外周静脉导管(PIVC)或中心静脉导管(CVC)给药的选择。传统上,血管加压素输注是通过中心静脉导管(CVC)而不是外周静脉内导管(PIVC)进行的,主要是由于担心外渗和由此导致的组织损伤。这种做法不受当代随机对照试验证据的指导。观察数据表明经PIVC输注血管加压素是安全的。为了解决这一证据差距,我们设计了“外周或中央通道输注血管加压剂”(VIPCA)随机对照试验(RCT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信