AMMSA-21: a revised version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression Scale in English, German, Polish and Spanish (AMMSA-21: una versión revisada de la escala Aceptación de Mitos Modernos sobre la Agresión Sexual en inglés, alemán, polaco y español)

Gerd Bohner, Alexa Weiss, Cindy Schirch, Lea Zöllner, Aldona Lipińska, María-José Sempere, Jesús L. Megías
{"title":"AMMSA-21: a revised version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression Scale in English, German, Polish and Spanish (AMMSA-21: una versión revisada de la escala Aceptación de Mitos Modernos sobre la Agresión Sexual en inglés, alemán, polaco y español)","authors":"Gerd Bohner, Alexa Weiss, Cindy Schirch, Lea Zöllner, Aldona Lipińska, María-José Sempere, Jesús L. Megías","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2022.2083291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>The authors present a revised version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA-21) in four languages (English, German, Polish and Spanish) and examine its reliability and validity (total <i>N</i> = 1,459). AMMSA-21 addresses themes emerging in recent public discourse (e.g., beliefs about false accusations) and contents similar to the original scale (e.g., antagonism towards victims’ demands); with 21 items, it is 30% shorter than the original. Factor analyses suggested that AMMSA-21 may be treated as a unidimensional construct. Across the four language versions, AMMSA-21 showed high internal consistency and criterion validity (positive correlations with hostile and benevolent sexism, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism); its scores were unrelated to socially desirable responding. Also, AMMSA-21 predicted judgements of victim-blaming and rape proclivity in relation to acquaintance-rape scenarios. Mean differences across language versions (Spanish &lt; English = German &lt; Polish) are discussed in terms of cultural influences. In sum, AMMSA-21 represents a reliable, valid and economical measure of contemporary sexual aggression myths.</p>","PeriodicalId":501236,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2022.2083291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The authors present a revised version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA-21) in four languages (English, German, Polish and Spanish) and examine its reliability and validity (total N = 1,459). AMMSA-21 addresses themes emerging in recent public discourse (e.g., beliefs about false accusations) and contents similar to the original scale (e.g., antagonism towards victims’ demands); with 21 items, it is 30% shorter than the original. Factor analyses suggested that AMMSA-21 may be treated as a unidimensional construct. Across the four language versions, AMMSA-21 showed high internal consistency and criterion validity (positive correlations with hostile and benevolent sexism, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism); its scores were unrelated to socially desirable responding. Also, AMMSA-21 predicted judgements of victim-blaming and rape proclivity in relation to acquaintance-rape scenarios. Mean differences across language versions (Spanish < English = German < Polish) are discussed in terms of cultural influences. In sum, AMMSA-21 represents a reliable, valid and economical measure of contemporary sexual aggression myths.

AMMSA-21:英文、德文、波兰文和西班牙文接受关于性侵犯的现代神话量表的修订版(AMMSA-21:英文、德文、波兰文和西班牙文接受关于性侵犯的现代神话量表的修订版)
摘要本文编制了《关于性侵犯的现代神话接受度量表》(AMMSA-21)的英语、德语、波兰语和西班牙语四种语言版本,并对其信度和效度进行了检验。AMMSA-21涉及最近公共话语中出现的主题(例如,对虚假指控的信念)和与原始量表相似的内容(例如,对受害者要求的对抗);21个项目,比原来减少了30%。因子分析表明,AMMSA-21可能被视为一个单维结构。在四个语言版本中,AMMSA-21具有较高的内部一致性和标准效度(与敌意和善意性别歧视、社会支配取向、右翼威权主义呈正相关);它的得分与社会期望反应无关。此外,AMMSA-21还能预测熟人强奸情景下的受害者指责判断和强奸倾向。不同语言版本的平均差异(西班牙语<英语=德语<在文化影响方面进行了讨论。总之,AMMSA-21代表了一个可靠的,有效的和经济的衡量当代性侵犯神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信