Evolution of the Sarnat exam and association with 2-year outcomes in infants with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a secondary analysis of the HEAL Trial

Ulrike Mietzsch, Sarah E Kolnik, Thomas Ragnar Wood, Niranjana Natarajan, Fernando F Gonzalez, Hannah Glass, Dennis E Mayock, Sonia L Bonifacio, Krisa Van Meurs, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Tai-Wei Wu, Yvonne W Wu, Sandra E Juul
{"title":"Evolution of the Sarnat exam and association with 2-year outcomes in infants with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a secondary analysis of the HEAL Trial","authors":"Ulrike Mietzsch, Sarah E Kolnik, Thomas Ragnar Wood, Niranjana Natarajan, Fernando F Gonzalez, Hannah Glass, Dennis E Mayock, Sonia L Bonifacio, Krisa Van Meurs, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Tai-Wei Wu, Yvonne W Wu, Sandra E Juul","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To study the association between the Sarnat exam (SE) performed before and after therapeutic hypothermia (TH) and outcomes at 2 years in infants with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Design Secondary analysis of the H igh-dose E rythropoietin for A sphyxia and Encepha L opathy Trial. Adjusted ORs (aORs) for death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) based on SE severity category and change in category were constructed, adjusting for sedation at time of exam. Absolute SE Score and its change were compared for association with risk for death or NDI using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing curves. Setting Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre trial including 17 centres across the USA. Patients 479/500 enrolled neonates who had both a qualifying SE (qSE) before TH and a SE after rewarming (rSE). Interventions Standardised SE was used across sites before and after TH. All providers underwent standardised SE training. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was defined as the composite outcome of death or any NDI at 22–36 months. Results Both qSE and rSE were associated with the primary outcome. Notably, an aOR for primary outcome of 6.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 12.6) and 50.3 (95% CI 13.3 to 190) was seen in those with moderate and severe encephalopathy on rSE, respectively. Persistent or worsened severity on rSE was associated with higher odds for primary outcome compared with those who improved, even when qSE was severe. Conclusion Both rSE and change between qSE and rSE were strongly associated with the odds of death/NDI at 22–36 months in infants with moderate or severe HIE. Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available upon request and will be publicly available soon.","PeriodicalId":501153,"journal":{"name":"Fetal & Neonatal","volume":"510 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal & Neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To study the association between the Sarnat exam (SE) performed before and after therapeutic hypothermia (TH) and outcomes at 2 years in infants with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Design Secondary analysis of the H igh-dose E rythropoietin for A sphyxia and Encepha L opathy Trial. Adjusted ORs (aORs) for death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) based on SE severity category and change in category were constructed, adjusting for sedation at time of exam. Absolute SE Score and its change were compared for association with risk for death or NDI using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing curves. Setting Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre trial including 17 centres across the USA. Patients 479/500 enrolled neonates who had both a qualifying SE (qSE) before TH and a SE after rewarming (rSE). Interventions Standardised SE was used across sites before and after TH. All providers underwent standardised SE training. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was defined as the composite outcome of death or any NDI at 22–36 months. Results Both qSE and rSE were associated with the primary outcome. Notably, an aOR for primary outcome of 6.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 12.6) and 50.3 (95% CI 13.3 to 190) was seen in those with moderate and severe encephalopathy on rSE, respectively. Persistent or worsened severity on rSE was associated with higher odds for primary outcome compared with those who improved, even when qSE was severe. Conclusion Both rSE and change between qSE and rSE were strongly associated with the odds of death/NDI at 22–36 months in infants with moderate or severe HIE. Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available upon request and will be publicly available soon.
中度或重度缺氧缺血性脑病婴儿Sarnat检查的演变及其与2年预后的关系:HEAL试验的二次分析
目的探讨中重度缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)患儿在治疗性低温治疗(TH)前后进行Sarnat检查(SE)与2岁预后的关系。设计:高剂量促红细胞生成素用于缺氧和脑病试验的二次分析。基于SE严重程度类别和类别变化构建死亡或神经发育障碍(NDI)的调整ORs (aORs),并对检查时的镇静进行调整。使用局部估计的散点图平滑曲线比较绝对SE评分及其变化与死亡或NDI风险的相关性。随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心试验,包括美国17个中心。479/500的患者纳入了在TH前有合格SE (qSE)和复温后有合格SE (rSE)的新生儿。干预措施在TH前后各部位采用标准化SE。所有的提供者都接受了标准化的SE培训。主要结局指标主要结局定义为22-36个月死亡或任何NDI的综合结局。结果qSE和rSE均与主要结局相关。值得注意的是,在中度和重度脑病患者中,主要结局的aOR分别为6.2 (95% CI 3.1 - 12.6)和50.3 (95% CI 13.3 - 190)。与改善者相比,持续或恶化的rSE严重程度与主要结局的几率更高相关,即使在qSE严重时也是如此。结论中重度HIE患儿22-36月龄时rSE及qSE与rSE的变化与死亡/NDI的几率密切相关。如有合理要求,可提供资料。数据可应要求提供,并将很快公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信