Juxtaposition, encounter and drift: transformative social innovation through culture and the arts

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Aviv Kruglanski
{"title":"Juxtaposition, encounter and drift: transformative social innovation through culture and the arts","authors":"Aviv Kruglanski","doi":"10.1108/sej-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to tentatively explore the benefits of placing art’s knowledge-building tradition, with its capacity to disrupt and reframe, at the centre of how we look at alternative organizing and alternative economic spaces, positioning lived experience, its uncertainties intact, at the heart of researching and practicing social enterprise (SE).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper explores indeterminacy through two case-study narratives, one of an academic arts-based research project and the other of a unique organization it encountered.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The paper describes the way juxtaposition, encounter and drift value indeterminacy as central to generative processes, challenging the control central to management and its research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The paper proposes that adopting an arts-based approach that challenges control can create a research instrument sensitive to similar tendencies in case studies, thus highlighting what is different and alternative about them. This responds to concerns about the diminishing centrality of SE’s democratizing ethic expressed in its scholarship, about creativity in its research and about its socially transformative potential.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The practice, by SEs of an approach welcoming chance, encounter, meandering paths and place-making with porous boundaries, proliferates transformative possibilities and is linked to democratization and participation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Though dangerously challenging to accepted notions of academic rigour, this paper proposes an unusual thought experiment tied in with lived experiences, in themselves experimental in practice.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"82 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to tentatively explore the benefits of placing art’s knowledge-building tradition, with its capacity to disrupt and reframe, at the centre of how we look at alternative organizing and alternative economic spaces, positioning lived experience, its uncertainties intact, at the heart of researching and practicing social enterprise (SE).

Design/methodology/approach

The paper explores indeterminacy through two case-study narratives, one of an academic arts-based research project and the other of a unique organization it encountered.

Findings

The paper describes the way juxtaposition, encounter and drift value indeterminacy as central to generative processes, challenging the control central to management and its research.

Research limitations/implications

The paper proposes that adopting an arts-based approach that challenges control can create a research instrument sensitive to similar tendencies in case studies, thus highlighting what is different and alternative about them. This responds to concerns about the diminishing centrality of SE’s democratizing ethic expressed in its scholarship, about creativity in its research and about its socially transformative potential.

Practical implications

The practice, by SEs of an approach welcoming chance, encounter, meandering paths and place-making with porous boundaries, proliferates transformative possibilities and is linked to democratization and participation.

Originality/value

Though dangerously challenging to accepted notions of academic rigour, this paper proposes an unusual thought experiment tied in with lived experiences, in themselves experimental in practice.

并置,相遇和漂移:通过文化和艺术变革的社会创新
本文旨在初步探讨将艺术的知识构建传统及其破坏和重构的能力置于我们如何看待替代组织和替代经济空间的中心的好处,将生活经验定位,其不确定性完好无损,置于研究和实践社会企业(SE)的核心。设计/方法/方法本文通过两个案例研究叙述来探讨不确定性,一个是基于学术艺术的研究项目,另一个是它遇到的一个独特组织。本文描述了并置、偶遇和漂移值不确定性作为生成过程的核心,挑战了管理及其研究的核心控制。研究局限性/意义本文提出,采用挑战控制的基于艺术的方法可以创建一种对案例研究中类似趋势敏感的研究工具,从而突出它们的不同之处和可替代之处。这回应了人们对东南大学在其学术研究中所表达的民主化伦理的中心地位日益下降的担忧,对其研究中的创造力以及对其社会变革潜力的担忧。实践意义通过SEs的方法,欢迎机会、相遇、蜿蜒的路径和具有多孔边界的场所制作,这种做法增加了变革的可能性,并与民主化和参与联系在一起。原创性/价值虽然对公认的学术严谨性观念提出了危险的挑战,但本文提出了一个与生活经验联系在一起的不同寻常的思想实验,其本身就是实践中的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信