Managing multi-sided platforms in an emerging country: challenges, critical success factors and contrasts with traditional companies

IF 7.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega, Tiago F.A.C. Sigahi, Izabela Simon Rampasso, Vinicius Luiz Ferraz Minatogawa, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes, Lucas Veiga Ávila, Rosley Anholon
{"title":"Managing multi-sided platforms in an emerging country: challenges, critical success factors and contrasts with traditional companies","authors":"Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega, Tiago F.A.C. Sigahi, Izabela Simon Rampasso, Vinicius Luiz Ferraz Minatogawa, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes, Lucas Veiga Ávila, Rosley Anholon","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-11-2022-0387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to analyze the main challenges and critical success factors (CSFs) in managing multi-sided platforms (MSP) in Brazil, as well as to understand the differences between this management model and traditional companies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced professionals in the field, focusing on challenges, CSFs and difficulties in managing MSP businesses. The data were analyzed using a mixed-method approach, involving content analysis for qualitative data and grey relational analysis and sensitivity analysis for quantitative data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The experts identified eight CSFs, seven key differences between traditional businesses and MSPs, and five technology-related challenges in managing MSPs. They assessed the main difficulties reported in the literature and ranked them, with the most critical challenges being competition with companies adopting MSP models in the same sector (product/service niche) and the necessity for ongoing process adjustments to accommodate scalability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study enhances understanding of CSF, disparities between traditional and MSPs and technology-related challenges in this management model. The results can assist managers in emerging nations in enhancing the performance of MSP operations and can be a resource for researchers studying various contexts and creating company guidelines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"223 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-11-2022-0387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to analyze the main challenges and critical success factors (CSFs) in managing multi-sided platforms (MSP) in Brazil, as well as to understand the differences between this management model and traditional companies.

Design/methodology/approach

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced professionals in the field, focusing on challenges, CSFs and difficulties in managing MSP businesses. The data were analyzed using a mixed-method approach, involving content analysis for qualitative data and grey relational analysis and sensitivity analysis for quantitative data.

Findings

The experts identified eight CSFs, seven key differences between traditional businesses and MSPs, and five technology-related challenges in managing MSPs. They assessed the main difficulties reported in the literature and ranked them, with the most critical challenges being competition with companies adopting MSP models in the same sector (product/service niche) and the necessity for ongoing process adjustments to accommodate scalability.

Originality/value

This study enhances understanding of CSF, disparities between traditional and MSPs and technology-related challenges in this management model. The results can assist managers in emerging nations in enhancing the performance of MSP operations and can be a resource for researchers studying various contexts and creating company guidelines.

在新兴国家管理多边平台:挑战、关键成功因素和与传统公司的对比
本文旨在分析巴西管理多边平台(MSP)的主要挑战和关键成功因素(CSFs),以及了解这种管理模式与传统公司之间的差异。设计/方法/方法与该领域经验丰富的专业人士进行半结构化访谈,重点讨论管理MSP业务的挑战、CSFs和困难。采用混合分析方法对数据进行分析,包括定性数据的内容分析和定量数据的灰色关联分析和敏感性分析。专家们确定了8个云服务中心,传统企业和托管服务提供商之间的7个关键区别,以及管理托管服务提供商的5个与技术相关的挑战。他们评估了文献中报告的主要困难,并对其进行了排名,其中最关键的挑战是与同一行业(产品/服务利基)采用MSP模型的公司的竞争,以及不断调整流程以适应可扩展性的必要性。原创性/价值本研究增强了对CSF、传统和msp之间的差异以及该管理模式中与技术相关的挑战的理解。研究结果可以帮助新兴国家的管理人员提高MSP业务的绩效,也可以成为研究各种情况和制定公司指导方针的研究人员的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Engineering-Control and Systems Engineering
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (JMTM) aspires to be the premier destination for impactful manufacturing-related research. JMTM provides comprehensive international coverage of topics pertaining to the management of manufacturing technology, focusing on bridging theoretical advancements with practical applications to enhance manufacturing practices. JMTM seeks articles grounded in empirical evidence, such as surveys, case studies, and action research, to ensure relevance and applicability. All submissions should include a thorough literature review to contextualize the study within the field and clearly demonstrate how the research contributes significantly and originally by comparing and contrasting its findings with existing knowledge. Articles should directly address management of manufacturing technology and offer insights with broad applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信