Eager Equality for Rational Number Arithmetic

Abstract

Eager equality for algebraic expressions over partial algebras distinguishes or separates terms only if both have defined values and they are different. We consider arithmetical algebras with division as a partial operator, called meadows, and focus on algebras of rational numbers. To study eager equality, we use common meadows, which are totalisations of partial meadows by means of absorptive elements. An axiomatisation of common meadows is the basis of an axiomatisation of eager equality as a predicate on a common meadow. Applied to the rational numbers, we prove completeness and decidability of the equational theory of eager equality. To situate eager equality theoretically, we consider two other partial equalities of increasing strictness: Kleene equality, which is equivalent to the native equality of common meadows, and one we call cautious equality. Our methods of analysis for eager equality are quite general, and so we apply them to these two other partial equalities; and, in addition to common meadows, we use three other kinds of algebra designed to totalise division. In summary, we are able to compare 13 forms of equality for the partial meadow of rational numbers. We focus on the decidability of the equational theories of these equalities. We show that for the four total algebras, eager and cautious equality are decidable. We also show that for others the Diophantine Problem over the rationals is one-one computably reducible to their equational theories. The Diophantine Problem for rationals is a longstanding open problem. Thus, eager equality has substantially less complex semantics.