Geometric Stabbing via Threshold Rounding and Factor Revealing LPs

IF 0.6 3区 数学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Khaled Elbassioni, Saurabh Ray
{"title":"Geometric Stabbing via Threshold Rounding and Factor Revealing LPs","authors":"Khaled Elbassioni, Saurabh Ray","doi":"10.1007/s00454-023-00608-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kovaleva and Spieksma (SIAM J Discrete Math 20(3):48–768, 2006) considered the problem of stabbing a given set of horizontal line segments with the smallest number of horizontal and vertical lines. The standard LP relaxation for this problem is easily shown to have an integrality gap of at most 2 by treating the horizontal and vertical lines separately. However, Kovaleva and Spieksma observed that threshold rounding can be used to obtain an integrality gap of <span>\\(e/(e-1) \\approx 1.58\\)</span> which is also shown to be tight. This is one of the rare known examples where the obvious upper bound of 2 on the integrality gap of the standard LP relaxation can be improved. Our goal in this paper is to extend their proof to two other problems where the goal is to stab a set <span>\\(\\mathcal {R}\\)</span> of objects with horizontal and vertical lines: in the first problem <span>\\(\\mathcal {R}\\)</span> is a set of horizontal and vertical line segments, and in the second problem <span>\\(\\mathcal {R}\\)</span> is a set of unit sized squares. The proof of Kovaleva and Spieksma essentially shows the existence of an appropriate threshold which yields the improved approximation factor. We begin by showing that a random threshold picked from an appropriate distribution works. This reduces the problem to finding an appropriate distribution for a desired approximation ratio. In the first problem, we show that the required distribution can be found by solving a linear program. In the second problem, while it seems harder to find the optimal distribution, we show that using the uniform distribution an improved approximation factor can still be obtained by solving a number of linear programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50574,"journal":{"name":"Discrete & Computational Geometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discrete & Computational Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-023-00608-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kovaleva and Spieksma (SIAM J Discrete Math 20(3):48–768, 2006) considered the problem of stabbing a given set of horizontal line segments with the smallest number of horizontal and vertical lines. The standard LP relaxation for this problem is easily shown to have an integrality gap of at most 2 by treating the horizontal and vertical lines separately. However, Kovaleva and Spieksma observed that threshold rounding can be used to obtain an integrality gap of \(e/(e-1) \approx 1.58\) which is also shown to be tight. This is one of the rare known examples where the obvious upper bound of 2 on the integrality gap of the standard LP relaxation can be improved. Our goal in this paper is to extend their proof to two other problems where the goal is to stab a set \(\mathcal {R}\) of objects with horizontal and vertical lines: in the first problem \(\mathcal {R}\) is a set of horizontal and vertical line segments, and in the second problem \(\mathcal {R}\) is a set of unit sized squares. The proof of Kovaleva and Spieksma essentially shows the existence of an appropriate threshold which yields the improved approximation factor. We begin by showing that a random threshold picked from an appropriate distribution works. This reduces the problem to finding an appropriate distribution for a desired approximation ratio. In the first problem, we show that the required distribution can be found by solving a linear program. In the second problem, while it seems harder to find the optimal distribution, we show that using the uniform distribution an improved approximation factor can still be obtained by solving a number of linear programs.

Abstract Image

通过阈值舍入和因子揭示lp的几何刺伤
Kovaleva和Spieksma (SIAM J Discrete Math 20(3): 48-768, 2006)考虑了用最小数量的水平线和垂直线刺穿一组给定水平线的问题。通过分别处理水平线和垂直线,很容易证明该问题的标准LP松弛具有至多2的完整性间隙。然而,Kovaleva和Spieksma观察到,可以使用阈值舍入来获得\(e/(e-1) \approx 1.58\)的完整性间隙,该间隙也显示为紧的。这是已知为数不多的可以改进标准LP弛豫的完整性间隙明显上界2的例子之一。我们在本文中的目标是将他们的证明扩展到另外两个问题,其中目标是用水平线和垂直线刺穿一组\(\mathcal {R}\)对象:在第一个问题中\(\mathcal {R}\)是一组水平线和垂直线段,在第二个问题中\(\mathcal {R}\)是一组单位大小的正方形。Kovaleva和Spieksma的证明基本上表明存在一个适当的阈值,该阈值产生改进的近似因子。我们首先展示从适当分布中选择的随机阈值是如何工作的。这将问题简化为为期望的近似比率找到合适的分布。在第一个问题中,我们证明了通过求解线性规划可以找到所需的分布。在第二个问题中,虽然很难找到最优分布,但我们证明了使用均匀分布仍然可以通过求解一些线性规划来获得改进的近似因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discrete & Computational Geometry
Discrete & Computational Geometry 数学-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Discrete & Computational Geometry (DCG) is an international journal of mathematics and computer science, covering a broad range of topics in which geometry plays a fundamental role. It publishes papers on such topics as configurations and arrangements, spatial subdivision, packing, covering, and tiling, geometric complexity, polytopes, point location, geometric probability, geometric range searching, combinatorial and computational topology, probabilistic techniques in computational geometry, geometric graphs, geometry of numbers, and motion planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信