Mechanisms of the Effect of Individual Education on Pro-European Dispositions

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Juan J. Fernández, Céline Teney, Juan Díez Medrano
{"title":"Mechanisms of the Effect of Individual Education on Pro-European Dispositions","authors":"Juan J. Fernández,&nbsp;Céline Teney,&nbsp;Juan Díez Medrano","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A burgeoning empirical literature on attitudes towards Europe shows that highly educated individuals are more likely to hold pro-European dispositions than non-highly educated individuals. The literature provides structural and cultural accounts for this relationship. The structural account highlights that formal education contributes to earning higher incomes and attaining an upper-class occupation, which are conducive to pro-European dispositions. The cultural account instead highlights that formal education instils universalist and non-traditionalist values in individuals, which are conducive to pro-European dispositions. This is the first article to assess the relative predictive power of these two approaches. Using structural equation models, Rounds 8–10 of the European Social Survey and three indicators of pro-European dispositions, this article examines whether socio-economic location measured by income and upper-class occupation or commitment to human values measured by universalism and traditionalism mediates this association. All in all, the structural approach receives stronger support than the cultural one.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"62 5","pages":"1119-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13560","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A burgeoning empirical literature on attitudes towards Europe shows that highly educated individuals are more likely to hold pro-European dispositions than non-highly educated individuals. The literature provides structural and cultural accounts for this relationship. The structural account highlights that formal education contributes to earning higher incomes and attaining an upper-class occupation, which are conducive to pro-European dispositions. The cultural account instead highlights that formal education instils universalist and non-traditionalist values in individuals, which are conducive to pro-European dispositions. This is the first article to assess the relative predictive power of these two approaches. Using structural equation models, Rounds 8–10 of the European Social Survey and three indicators of pro-European dispositions, this article examines whether socio-economic location measured by income and upper-class occupation or commitment to human values measured by universalism and traditionalism mediates this association. All in all, the structural approach receives stronger support than the cultural one.

Abstract Image

个体教育对亲欧倾向的影响机制
关于对欧洲态度的实证文献显示,受过高等教育的人比没有受过高等教育的人更有可能持有亲欧倾向。文献为这种关系提供了结构和文化上的解释。结构性解释强调正规教育有助于获得更高的收入和获得上层阶级的职业,这有利于亲欧洲的倾向。相反,文化解释强调正规教育向个人灌输普遍主义和非传统主义价值观,这有利于亲欧洲的倾向。这是第一篇评估这两种方法的相对预测能力的文章。本文利用结构方程模型、欧洲社会调查的第8-10轮和亲欧倾向的三个指标,考察了以收入和上层阶级职业衡量的社会经济位置,或以普遍主义和传统主义衡量的对人类价值的承诺,是否介导了这种联系。总而言之,结构方法比文化方法得到更大的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信