Stone–Geary type preferences and the long-run labor supply

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS
Tamotsu Nakamura
{"title":"Stone–Geary type preferences and the long-run labor supply","authors":"Tamotsu Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s40844-021-00204-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In most advanced economies, working hours have steadily declined, while the per-capita income has steadily increased. Boppart and Krusell (J Polit Econ 128(1):118–157, 2020) propose a new preference class in order to account for these observations. They show that the income effect on labor supply exceeds the substitution effect in the balanced-growth path. However, the longer-term changes, or less-developed economies, reveal backward-bending relationships between income and working hours. To explain this fact, we introduce Stone–Geary type non-homotheticity in preferences into a non-overlapping generations model, and analyze how working hours evolve with income. With the non-homotheticity, the long-run equilibrium labor supply bends backward. Further, the backward-bending curve emerges not only as a transitional phenomenon, but also in the balanced-growth path.</p>","PeriodicalId":44114,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-021-00204-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In most advanced economies, working hours have steadily declined, while the per-capita income has steadily increased. Boppart and Krusell (J Polit Econ 128(1):118–157, 2020) propose a new preference class in order to account for these observations. They show that the income effect on labor supply exceeds the substitution effect in the balanced-growth path. However, the longer-term changes, or less-developed economies, reveal backward-bending relationships between income and working hours. To explain this fact, we introduce Stone–Geary type non-homotheticity in preferences into a non-overlapping generations model, and analyze how working hours evolve with income. With the non-homotheticity, the long-run equilibrium labor supply bends backward. Further, the backward-bending curve emerges not only as a transitional phenomenon, but also in the balanced-growth path.

石艺类型偏好与长期劳动力供给
在大多数发达经济体,工作时间稳步下降,而人均收入稳步增长。Boppart和Krusell (J Polit economics 128(1): 118-157, 2020)提出了一个新的偏好类别来解释这些观察结果。结果表明,在均衡增长路径下,收入对劳动力供给的影响超过了替代效应。然而,较长期的变化,或欠发达经济体,揭示了收入和工作时间之间的反向关系。为了解释这一事实,我们将Stone-Geary类型的偏好非同质性引入到非重叠代模型中,并分析了工作时间随收入的变化情况。在非同质性条件下,长期均衡劳动供给向后弯曲。此外,后弯曲线不仅作为一种过渡现象出现,而且也出现在平衡增长路径中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review (EIER) is issued by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics to provide an international forum for new theoretical and empirical approaches to evolutionary and institutional economics. EIER, free from the view of equilibrium economics and methodological individualism, should face the diversity of human behavior and dynamic transformation of institutions. In EIER, “economics” is used in its broadest sense. It covers areas from the classic research in economic history, economic thought, economic theory, and management science to emerging research fields such as economic sociology, bio-economics, evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, complex systems study, econo-physics, experimental economics, and so on. EIER follows the belief that a truly interdisciplinary discussion is needed to propel the investigation in the dynamic process of socio-economic change where institutions as emergent outcomes of human actions do matter. Although EIER is an official journal of the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, it welcomes non-members'' contributions from all parts of the world. All the contributions are refereed under strict scientific criteria, although EIER does not apply monolithic formalistic measure to them. Evolution goes hand in hand with diversities; this is also the spirit of EIER. Focus areas of the Review (not exhaustive): - Foundations of institutional and evolutionary economics - Criticism of mainstream views in the social sciences - Knowledge and learning in socio-economic life - Development and innovation of technologies - Transformation of industrial organizations and economic systems - Experimental studies in economics - Agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems - Evolution of the governance structure of firms and other organizations - Comparison of dynamically changing institutions of the world - Policy proposals in the transformational process of economic life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信