Truths and unfreedoms of regimes of insecurity and the resistance of the commons

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS
Srinath Jagannathan, Patturaja Selvaraj
{"title":"Truths and unfreedoms of regimes of insecurity and the resistance of the commons","authors":"Srinath Jagannathan, Patturaja Selvaraj","doi":"10.1108/cpoib-08-2020-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to explore narratives of insecurity to understand how the casualisation of the employment relationship makes life more fragile and precarious. The authors engage in an inquiry about how multinational enterprises (MNEs) structure precariousness for workers in emerging economies. The authors attempt to understand how workers analyse their experiences of precariousness and what form their resistance takes as a result of their analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors engage with the narratives of eight Indian workers/trade union activists working in different marginal spaces of the Indian economy to uncover a commons where we are the multitude. By commons, the authors imply shared forms of property, which stand against the concept of private property that is central to the social relations of capitalism. The authors are performing the data of workers by interspersing them in an analysis of angst and hope.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Workers understand their experiences of precariousness as emerging from a complex political economy structured by MNEs, which involves multiple fronts of marginalisation. Workers realize that they need to engage in comprehensive forms of resistance to undo the regimes of precariousness. Workers create shared universes of grief to relate to each other’s experiences of precariousness. The unfreedoms experienced by workers lead to a sharing of the social relations of commons where workers can resist by expressing solidarity with each other.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The authors contribute to practice by arguing that workers’ collectives should not accept the naturalisation of precariousness. By staging a dialogue about the injuries of precariousness, they can craft a politics of resistance that begins the process of commoning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Workers’ politics of resistance can significantly democratise the global political economy in important ways by advancing the potential for commons.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors make an original contribution to the study of precariousness in the context of international business by arguing that the experience of precariousness can lead to a commons where workers resist structures of injustice.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46124,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2020-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore narratives of insecurity to understand how the casualisation of the employment relationship makes life more fragile and precarious. The authors engage in an inquiry about how multinational enterprises (MNEs) structure precariousness for workers in emerging economies. The authors attempt to understand how workers analyse their experiences of precariousness and what form their resistance takes as a result of their analysis.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors engage with the narratives of eight Indian workers/trade union activists working in different marginal spaces of the Indian economy to uncover a commons where we are the multitude. By commons, the authors imply shared forms of property, which stand against the concept of private property that is central to the social relations of capitalism. The authors are performing the data of workers by interspersing them in an analysis of angst and hope.

Findings

Workers understand their experiences of precariousness as emerging from a complex political economy structured by MNEs, which involves multiple fronts of marginalisation. Workers realize that they need to engage in comprehensive forms of resistance to undo the regimes of precariousness. Workers create shared universes of grief to relate to each other’s experiences of precariousness. The unfreedoms experienced by workers lead to a sharing of the social relations of commons where workers can resist by expressing solidarity with each other.

Practical implications

The authors contribute to practice by arguing that workers’ collectives should not accept the naturalisation of precariousness. By staging a dialogue about the injuries of precariousness, they can craft a politics of resistance that begins the process of commoning.

Social implications

Workers’ politics of resistance can significantly democratise the global political economy in important ways by advancing the potential for commons.

Originality/value

The authors make an original contribution to the study of precariousness in the context of international business by arguing that the experience of precariousness can lead to a commons where workers resist structures of injustice.

不安全政权的真相和不自由以及平民的反抗
本文旨在探讨不安全感的叙事,以了解雇佣关系的随意化如何使生活更加脆弱和不稳定。作者对跨国企业(MNEs)如何为新兴经济体的工人构建不稳定性进行了调查。作者试图理解工人如何分析他们的不稳定经历,以及他们的分析结果是什么形式的抵抗。设计/方法/方法作者参与了八位在印度经济不同边缘空间工作的印度工人/工会活动家的叙述,以揭示我们是大众的共同之处。作者所说的“公地”指的是共享形式的财产,这与作为资本主义社会关系核心的私有财产概念背道而驰。作者将工人的数据穿插在焦虑和希望的分析中。工人们将他们的不稳定经历理解为来自跨国公司构建的复杂政治经济,其中涉及边缘化的多个方面。工人们意识到,他们需要进行各种形式的全面抵抗,以推翻不稳定的制度。工人们创造了共同的悲伤世界,将彼此的不稳定经历联系起来。工人所经历的不自由导致了共享的社会关系,工人可以通过表达彼此的团结来抵抗。实践意义:作者认为,工人集体不应该接受不稳定性的归化,从而为实践做出了贡献。通过对不稳定的伤害进行对话,他们可以设计出一种抵抗政治,从而开始共同的过程。社会意义工人的抵抗政治可以通过促进公地的潜力,以重要的方式显著地使全球政治经济民主化。原创性/价值两位作者对国际商业背景下的不稳定性研究做出了原创性贡献,他们认为不稳定性的经历可以导致工人抵制不公正结构的公地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In recent years, the business practices and management philosophies of global enterprises have been subject to increasingly close scrutiny by commentators in the fields of journalism and academia. Such scrutiny has been motivated by a growing desire to examine the nature of globalisation, its impact on specific communities and its benefits for society as a whole. Coverage includes, but is not restricted to, issues of: ■Globalization ■Production and consumption ■Economic change ■Societal change ■Politics and power of organizations and governments ■Environmental impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信