Testing thrasymachus’ hypothesis: the psychological processes behind power justification

IF 1.4 3区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Philosophical Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1080/09515089.2023.2290166

Francesco Rigoli

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on distributive justice has shown that people’s judgments on how to distribute resources justly are shaped by various criteria including equity, need, equality, and prior ownership. Yet, a...

查看原文本刊更多论文

thrasymachus假说的检验:权力正当化背后的心理过程

对分配正义的研究表明，人们对如何公平分配资源的判断受到公平、需要、平等和优先占有等多种标准的影响。然而,一个…

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Philosophical Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

14.30%

发文量

120

期刊介绍： Philosophical Psychology is an international journal devoted to developing and strengthening the links between philosophy and the psychological sciences, both as basic sciences and as employed in applied settings, by publishing original, peer-refereed contributions to this expanding field of study and research. Published articles deal with issues that arise in the cognitive and brain sciences, and in areas of applied psychology.