How click-like and online trust matter across generations of bank customers

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lobel Trong Thuy Tran
{"title":"How click-like and online trust matter across generations of bank customers","authors":"Lobel Trong Thuy Tran","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-07-2023-0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This article aims to explore the impact of interpersonal relationship stimuli and click-like on purchase intention across different generations of bank customers, with a focus on the moderating effect of online trust.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The sample consists of 435 online bank customers from the Facebook community and the data collection was conducted using an online survey method. The model estimation utilized the partial least squares technique, along with multigroup analysis and importance-performance map analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The empirical evidence supports the hypothesized relationships between interpersonal relationship stimuli, click-like and purchase intention, but varies across different generations and is contingent upon online trust. The analysis reveals commonalities in how Generation Z, Millennials and Generation X respond to interpersonal relationship stimuli while exhibiting distinct responses to click-like.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The empirical evidence confirms the hypothesized relationships between interpersonal relationship stimuli, click-like and purchase intention. However, these relationships exhibit variations across different generations and are contingent upon the level of online trust. The analysis highlights shared responses to interpersonal relationship stimuli among Generation Z, Millennials and Generation X, while also revealing distinct reactions to click-like within these generational groups.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research investigates the collective impact of interpersonal relationship stimuli and click-like on purchase intention, taking into account the moderating role of online trust within various generational cohorts in the banking sector.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-07-2023-0399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This article aims to explore the impact of interpersonal relationship stimuli and click-like on purchase intention across different generations of bank customers, with a focus on the moderating effect of online trust.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample consists of 435 online bank customers from the Facebook community and the data collection was conducted using an online survey method. The model estimation utilized the partial least squares technique, along with multigroup analysis and importance-performance map analysis.

Findings

The empirical evidence supports the hypothesized relationships between interpersonal relationship stimuli, click-like and purchase intention, but varies across different generations and is contingent upon online trust. The analysis reveals commonalities in how Generation Z, Millennials and Generation X respond to interpersonal relationship stimuli while exhibiting distinct responses to click-like.

Research limitations/implications

The empirical evidence confirms the hypothesized relationships between interpersonal relationship stimuli, click-like and purchase intention. However, these relationships exhibit variations across different generations and are contingent upon the level of online trust. The analysis highlights shared responses to interpersonal relationship stimuli among Generation Z, Millennials and Generation X, while also revealing distinct reactions to click-like within these generational groups.

Originality/value

This research investigates the collective impact of interpersonal relationship stimuli and click-like on purchase intention, taking into account the moderating role of online trust within various generational cohorts in the banking sector.

点击式和在线信任对几代银行客户来说有多重要
目的本研究旨在探讨人际关系刺激和点击偏好对不同代际银行客户购买意愿的影响,重点研究网络信任的调节作用。设计/方法/方法样本包括来自Facebook社区的435名网上银行客户,数据收集采用在线调查方法进行。模型估计采用偏最小二乘技术,结合多组分析和重要性-性能图分析。研究结果:经验证据支持人际关系刺激、点击和购买意愿之间的假设关系,但在不同的世代之间存在差异,并取决于在线信任。该分析揭示了Z世代、千禧一代和X世代对人际关系刺激的反应的共性,而对点击式的反应却截然不同。研究局限/启示经验证据证实了人际关系刺激、点击喜好和购买意愿之间的假设关系。然而,这些关系在不同的世代之间表现出差异,并取决于在线信任的水平。该分析强调了Z世代、千禧一代和X世代对人际关系刺激的共同反应,同时也揭示了这些世代对点击的不同反应。原创性/价值本研究考察了人际关系刺激和点击对购买意愿的集体影响,同时考虑了银行业不同世代群体的在线信任的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
18.90%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe. Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings. In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信